1/24
21 - 27
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Describe what happens during brain development
between 12 - 24 months
myelinasation continues, especially in cortex and between cortex & brain stem
myelinisation is responsible for increase in brain size and weight
at 20 months
cortex reaches its maximum thickness
at 24 months
axons reach adult length and density
distribution and relative size of brain structures are adult-like 70% of adult weight
beyond 24 months
brain development slows
Describe the process of learning how to walk
6 – 12 months: crawling & shuffling on buttocks
By 12 months: can pull self-upright; take first steps
By 18 months: most children can walk independently
Walking is not a maturational process
Describe the process of developing fine motor skills
Major advancements in control of fine motor skills are made in early childhood
Voluntary reaching starts at 3 months old but is smooth and effortless by 11 months
12 month old: able to use pincer grasp; major step-change advance
24 month old: child able to feed self
30 month old: child able to dress/undress self
Describe the development of language
From 12 months
Child produces first words
Not necessarily real words, e.g. ‘oof’ = animal
From 18 months
‘telegraphic speech’ appears, e.g. ‘mommy sit’
Rapid increase in vocabulary: 20 word vocabulary increase to 200 words at 21 months
Between 24 – 27 months
Child produces 3 & 4 word utterances
Error reveal use of grammatical rules, e.g. ‘I runned fast’: overregularisation of ‘ed’
Around 3 years
Rapid increase in use of grammatical rules (e.g. negative)
Pronunciation improves greatly
What is Skinners (1950) behaviourist theory
proposed language is learnt via operant conditioning
Children imitate adult utterances; adults selectively reinforce them
Reinforce sounds into words
Reinforce words in correct context, e.g. parent smiles when child says ‘doggie’ only when dog is present
Propose we learn to use whole sentences through imitation and reinforcement
Arguments in favour of Skinners behaviourist theory
adults do reinforce children’s speech
“say ‘please’ and I will give you a cookie”
explains why children learn local language and dialect
Limitations of Skinners behaviourist theory
overregulatisation of grammatical rules, adults don’t use such words - suggests that children develop grammatical rules
e.g. ‘my teacher holded the baby rabbits’
What was Chomsky (1950) nativist theory
proposed humans have innate language-learning system
Argued grammar is too complex to be learnt by cognitive immature child, so perhaps humans have innate knowledge of grammar
Suggest humans have a “Language Acquisition Device” (LAD)
LAD contains universal rules of grammar found in all languages
Innate knowledge enables child to interpret the specific grammar of native language
Argument in favour of Chomsky nativist theory
universal properties of language learning suggest innate mechanism:
language occurs in all cultures
children in all cultures go through the same stages of language development
language share universal properties (e.g. nouns, verbs)
Limitations of Chomsky nativist theory
focuses on grammar and ignores social interaction
What was Bruner (1983) social interaction theory
argues that preverbal social interactions form the basis for learning language
E.g. joint focus of attention, gesturing, interpretation of gurgles as meaningful; pre-verbal form of simple conversation
Arguments in favour of Bruner (1983) social interaction theory
Children raised in isolation have linguistic deficits
Adult-child speech facilitates learning
Shorter, simpler and repetitive utterances
Slower speech, longer pauses, more stress
Higher and more varied pitch
Same features in many cultures
Limitations of Bruner (1983) social interaction theory
not clear how it could account for, e.g. over regularisation errors
What does it mean to form categories and why is it important
forming categories is essential to make sense of the world and interact with it effectively
Describe the growth of categorisation
at 12 months
children ground objects based on perceptual similarity, e.g. ‘A’ is different from ‘2’
at 2 years old
can group perceptually different objects into hierarchical categories, e.g. can group objects into ‘kitchen utensils’ even if the objects are perceptually different
categories can include anything, e.g. kitchen utensils, animal, plants, etc
after age 2
rapidly learn new ‘basic level’ categories
categories are subdivided with age; ‘furniture’-‘chairs’-‘dining chairs’
organisation helps thinking about the world in a meaningful way, e.g. ‘dog’ is linked to: ‘has 4 legs’, ‘is an animal’
Describe Lewis & Brooks-Gunn (1979) study - recognition of the self
9 – 24 months old placed in front of a mirror
Mother puts red dye on child’s nose
< 15 months: reach to red nose in mirror; as in not related to themselves
> 15 months: more likely to touch own nose with increasing age
Suggests increasing awareness of the self
By age 2: prefer to look at picture of self, not other children, i.e. self-concept is well formed
Self-concept provides a reference for
interpreting social world
A child’s ability to display emotion
< 1 year
Ability to display ‘basic emotion’, i.e. those that can be inferred directly from facial expressions
E.g. happiness, sadness, anger, fear, disgust, surprise
1.5 – 2 years
Ability to display more complex ‘self-conscious’ emotions, e.g. pride, shame. Embarrassment. Guilt
Requires self-awareness (occurs 18 months – 2 years)
3 years
Children become able to use ‘emotional masks’, i.e. can display an emotion that they don’t feel
Easier to act happy than sad or angry
Become better at concealing negative emotions (e.g. become able to hide anger in presence of an adult)
Emotional deception is due to social pressures (e.g. encourage positive emotional displays to promote good relationships)
What is pro-social behaviour
behaviour that benefits others without expected benefit in return
How is pro-social behaviour shown in children
before 1 - 2 years: seek comfort for self in response to another’s distress
after 1 - 2 years: more likely to comfort others
Between 6 - 12 month old children develop cognitive & motor skills enabling
physical aggression
Hartup (1974) identified 2 kinds of aggression
hostile: aggressive behaviour where harm is the main motivation
instrumental: behaviour that is aggressive in form, but motivated by a goal other than harm (e.g. to get a toy)
Amount and type of aggression changes over early childhood - Holmberry (1980) found
1 year olds: 50% of all actions directed towards other children were coercive
3.5 year olds: falls to 17%
Describe the development of play
Before 1 year:
Infants start playing with objects (picking up, banging together, etc)
Play becomes more sophisticated as motor skills develop, but remains physical
Between 1 – 2 years:
Pretend play emerges around 12 months: temporarily substitutes different properties for the object being played with
Pretend play develops gradually: initially depends on real objects, e .g. drinking from a cup. Become able to use less realistic substitutes, e.g. banana = phone
Initially, symbolic play is directed towards self, e.g. pretending to eat using a spoon
Later is directed towards other objects, e.g. child pretends to feed a doll
Around age 2 years:
Child becomes detached in symbolic play, e.g. child makes a doll feed itself
Around age 2.5 years onwards:
‘Sociodramatic play’ emerges: pretend play with other children
Children share the same ‘scheme’ and act out roles
Sequence of play development mirrors increasing social, cognitive & verbal sophistication
Burns & Brainerd (1979); Connolly & Doyle (1984) - Is play important for development?
Children who spend more time in sociodramatic play:
Better cognitive & emotional development than peers
Seen as more socially competent by teachers