1/77
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Communication vs language vs speech
Communication: process of exchanging information and ideas, needs, and desires between two or more individuals
collaborative
Multiple modalities (spoked, signed, written)
Occurs within a specific cultural context
Linguistic and para-linguistic components
Language: process that involves a code, system and arbitrary signals. It also involves:
phonetics (sounds)
Phonology (sound structure)
Morphology (words)
Syntax (sentences)
Semantics (meaning)
Pragmatics (use)
Speech: verbal communication through articulation
properties of human language that are found in other animal communication systems or are successfully taught to other species
Have fewer forms to express limited content for limited uses combined in limited ways
Difference between form, content, and use
Form: sound units and sequences + words and word beginnings and endings
phonology
Morphology
Syntax
Content: word order and their relationships
semantics
Use: language in context
pragmatics
competence vs performance
competence: inner, unconscious knowledge of the rules of language
Performance: expression of the rules in everyday speech
Descriptive vs prescriptive grammar
prescriptive: specify how language and its grammar rules should be used
Descriptive: describe how people use language in daily life including standard and nonstandard varieties
Different types of methods used in acquisition research
Spontaneous conversational sampling or natural observation ‘
Diary studies
Checklists
Language sample
Structured testing or experimental manipulation
Habituation
Conditioned head turn
Preferential looking
Neuroimaging
Diary
pros: rich qualitative and longitudinal data
Cons: memory limitations, unintentional bias, only production, time & effort consuming, validity and reliability not clear
Checklists
Usually with screening tools and criterion-referenced assessments
Pros: normed data, low cost, time efficient, uses comprehension and production, early age
Cons: bias and limited number of pre-determined items
Language sample analysis
Pros: more naturalistic and ecologically valid
Cons: time consuming and labor intensive
Habituation
Commonly use in testing phoneme distinction in infants
pro: no reliance on overt response (good for young infants)
Con: can’t fully indicate what the autonomous response actually means
Conditioned head turn
pros: multiple trials, linking stimulus and response
Cons: cannot be reliably used under 6 months of age and additional task demands
Preferential looking
pros: naturalistic response, cross-modal
Cons: limited information (know where, not why), difficulty with younger infants, observer bias
Neuroimaging
pros: reveal biological mechanisms that underlie cognitive capacities
Cons: expensive and infants are hard to make sit still
Behaviorism
language acquisition could be explained by operant conditioning
Increase a behavior by pairing performance of the target behavior with a positive reward
Empiricist theory
Reinforcement and imitation drive language learning
Positive reinforcement through:
Positive affect
Comprehension
nativism
language cannot be learned through just conditioning
Speed of acquistion is too rapid (lexical explosion)
No other species have evolved to have complex communication system
Errors children make (like past tense) cannot be explained by either imitation or reinforcement
Generativism
all humans have an innate capacity for language (universal grammar or language acquisition device)
Set of grammatical knowledge common to all the language of the world
Constructivism/cognitivism
language acquistion emerges through cognitive skills (like object permanence)
In learning languages, children are learning to pair words with concepts they have already acquired —> using schemas
Social interactionism
social interaction is central to learning
Social contexts provide scaffolding for learning
Zone of proximal development: distance between child’s actual development level and their level of potential development
tʃ
[ch]
EX: chair, nature, teach
dʒ
[ j ]
EX: gin, joy, edge
θ
[th]
EX: thing, teeth
ð
[th]
EX: this, that, father
ʃ
[sh]
EX: sure, leash, emotion, she
ʒ
[zh]
Ex: vision, measure, leisure
/i/
high, front, unrounded
EX: beet
I
front, high, unrounded
EX: sIt
/e/
Front, mid, unrounded
EX: bait
/ɛ/
front, mid, unrounded
ex: bet
ɜ
Central, mid, unrounded
BIrd
æ
Front, open, unrounded
ʌ
Back, mid, unrounded
Run
ɔ
Back, open-mid, rounded
Law, caught
ʊ
Back, high, rounded
Put, wood
u
Back, high rounded
Soon, through
ə
Central, mid, unrounded
About
a
Front, low, unrounded
Hat
Common phonological processes
substitution
Assimilation
Word shape patterns
Substitution
fronting (front sound for back sound)
Stopping (stop for fricative)
Gliding (glide for liquid)
Assimilation
place assimilation: incorrect placement
Consonant harmony: incorrect use of CVC pattern in words
Initial voicing: voiceless is replaced with a voiced
Final devoicing: voiced is replaced with a voiceless
Word shape patterns
Final consonant deletion: from CVC to CV (last consonant)
Cluster simplification: removal of a consonant
Reduplication: CVCV (dada, Kiki)
Weak syllable deletion: unstressed syllables are deleted
Stage 1 (0-2 months)
Reflexive stage (reflexive/vegetative sounds) → fussing, crying, burping, swallowing (automatic)
quasi-resonant nuclei
Vowel like sounds with consonantal elements
Vibration of vocal folds
In response to interaction with caregivers
Stage 2 (2-4 months)
cooing and laughter
Primarily vowel sounds - 8 weeks
Turn-taking - about 12 weeks
Laughter - about 16 weeks
Stage 3 (4-6 months)
vocal play
extreme of loud and soft, high and low
Bilabial trills
Non-speech grunts growls
Adding consonants
Stops, nasals, and glides
Some syllables
Stage 4 (6 months and up)
babbling:
Reduplicated babbling - about 9 months
CV sequences (dadada)
Primarily vowels, stops, nasals and glides
Nonreduplicated babbling - about 12 months
Pabida
Baby jargon: long strings of unintelligible sounds with adult-like prosody and intonation
first words (around 12 months)
single syllables with CV structures or reduplicated syllable s
Draws from a small inventory of sounds from the babbling stage
Many common phonological processes
which phonological process is active during the first words stage?
phonological templates: a generalized sequence of phone categories that create a template (CV, CVC)
after learning several words, children discover words follow phonotactic rules and develop a template that functions across their system
[baba, dada, mama, Wawa] = CaCa
Processes involved in speech perception
Segmentation
Discrimination
Categorization
Comprehension (all lead to this)
Segmentation
segment single unit from continuous speech
Starts at around 6 months of age
discrimination
knowing that two sounds are different
Perceptual tuning/narrowing (ability to perceive sounds in one’s linguistic environment while reducing in ability to perceive difference in sounds not present in the linguistic environment)
By 6-8 months, infants get better at discriminating sounds in their own linguistic environment and worse at foreign sounds
Categorization
Labeling a sound
its difficult to map different phonemes and waveforms because different individuals have different rates of speech = variability in speech
Perception of distinct categories when their is gradual change in a variable along a continuum
How is the head turn paradigm used to study infants’ speech perception?
The paradigm allows researchers to study if infants understand certain words
EX: Jusczyk and Aslin
infant is given a passage of a dog during the familiarization
Is given 2 words dog or cup correlated with two lights on either side of the room
Babies head turns are measured = higher head turns towards dog (familiar stimulus) than cup (unfamiliar stimulus) → 7.5 months better
Properties of infant-directed speech
Exaggerated prosody
higher pitch voice
Wider pitch range
Longer pauses
Shorter phrases
Slower tempo
Free morpheme
Can stand alone as individual words
Bound morpheme
cannot not stand alone and need another morpheme to attach to
Simple morpheme
made up of one morpheme
Complex morpheme
made up of two or more morphemes
Cues children rely on to identify words
Trochaic stress pattern (pattern in which first syllable is stressed)
Transitional probabilities (how likely a symbol will appear when given a preceding symbol)
Phonotactic constraints (using sounds in a given language to determine how words and syllables are combined)
Underextension
Incorrect assumption where individual is not extending a word to the correct object
EX: a child not labeling penguins as a type of bird
Overextension
incorrect assumption which in an individual is extend a word for an incorrect object
EX: calling an airplane a bird
Milestones in typical lexical development
Recognize own name → ~4 months
First signs of word comprehension → 6~8 months
Production of first word → 10~15 months
Produce 50 words → 18 months
Constraints that guide object names
Mutual exclusivity (a bias to line up object categories and linguistic labels in a one-to-one correspondence)
Whole object bias (new word refers to entire object rather a subset of it)
Taxonomic principle (a novel word that refers to one thing can also refer to things of a similar kind)
Syntactic bootstrapping
Using syntactic properties of words to identify and narrow down those aspects of meaning that words are likely to convey
Can be used to figure out if word is:
intransitive or transitive
It’s part of speech
Inflectional affix
Added to assign a particular grammatical property to the word
Do not change the essential meaning or grammatical category of the word
In the English language, there can only be one per word
Types
Plural [-s]
Possessive [-‘s]
Present tense [-s]
Past tense [-ed]
Past participle [-en]
Present participle [-ing]
Adjective comparative [-er]
Adjective superlative [-est]
Derivational affix
play more of semantic role
Often change the meaning and also the grammatical category of the word
There can be multiple per word
Semantic relations between words at 2 word stage
Agent + action
Action + object
Agent + object
Action + location
Entity + location
Possessor + possession
Entity + attribute
Demonstrative + entity
Milestones in typical syntactic development
One-word stage
Two-word stage combinations
Telegraphic speech
Computing mean length of utterance
Find the averages of multiple utterances
Count the morphemes per word and add them up
Count the amount of words in the utterances
Average them out
Only include morphemes used productively
allgone or goodnight = 1 morpheme
Walked or singing = 2 morphemes
Brown’s study on the order of acquisition of function morphemes
Found that order in which function morphemes are acquired is very similar across children
EX: production of progressives occurs first than plurals
Wug test
test used to study how children learn morphemes and develop their syntax
Overgeneralization of rules and U-shaped development
Children’s syntax development has a u-shape where:
Have no generalizations (adult like) when first learning a word
But start making overgeneralizations (more errors) as they learn about grammatical rules and start using them incorrectly
As they learn exceptions to these rules and correctly generalize, their grammar is adult-like again
Syntax of negation acquisition
Single word (no, don’t, no-more)
External negative: negative marker outside before the sentence (no go movies, no mommy do it)
Internal negative without auxiliaries: negative before main verb and after first noun phrase with auxiliaries (I no like it, I no want book)
Correct internal negation with auxiliaries (Sarah can not have one, you did not caught me) - can still make mistakes in word order
Types of questions
Intonation only (You’re serious?)
Tag questions (You’re serious, aren’t you?)
Yes-no (Are you serious?)
Wh- questions (What did you say?)
Stages of question acquisition
Intonation only
yes/no = marked by intonation only
Wh-questions = incorrect structure (what that is?)
Add auxiliaries
yes/no (Will it fit?)
Wh-questions (What a doctor can do?) = incorrect structure
Subject-aux inversion in wh-questions
wh-questions: (what can a doctor do?)
Errors of omission and commission
omission = missing function morphemes (daddy go)
Commission = incorrect modification or addition (him eat, brang, goed)
How children interpret passive voice sentences
children focus on the word order, instead of the broad meaning of the sentence leading to confusion to the main subject vs object of the sentence
Identifying types of relative clauses
Subject relative clause (clause is missing the subject)
Object relative clause (clause is missing the object)
Object relative clause is more difficulty than subject for children
Experimental methods used to test syntax comprehension
Language sample analysis (hard to see actual productions tho)
Elicitation experiments (preferential looking, habituation, etc)
Poverty of stimulus and negative evidence
Poverty of the stimulus → children are not exposed to rich enough data to acquire all the rules of their language
Negative evidence → children are only exposed to positive evidence (but not the negative or what is not possible in a language)
parents mostly focus on explicit corrections or don’t directly correct ungrammatical utterances
Regardless of these two factors, children learn grammar because basic knowledge about how human language works is innate