A typological comparison of NP vs DP languages

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 3 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/15

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 9:09 AM on 1/7/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

16 Terms

1
New cards

DP Languages

Languages that have a Determiner (D) head projecting over a noun, usually indicated by the presence of articles. Examples: English, Swedish, Bulgarian, Romanian.

2
New cards

NP Languages

Languages where nouns appear “bare” without overt articles, and where there may not be a DP layer. Examples: Japanese, Korean, Slavic languages like Serbo-Croatian.

3
New cards

Article as D Head

In DP languages, the definite or indefinite article functions as the head of the DP, taking an NP complement.

  • English: The dogthe = D, dog = NP

4
New cards

Head Movement in DP Languages

Some languages, like Scandinavian and Romanian, attach the definite article as a suffix to the noun through head movement, forming a complex N+D head.

Examples:

  • Swedish: Mann-en (“man-the”)

  • Romanian: băiat-ul (“boy-the”)

  • Bulgarian: kola-ta (“car-the”)

5
New cards

Left-Branch Extraction (LBE)

A property of some NP languages where adjectives or modifiers can move out of the NP. DP languages block LBE.

Examples:

  • Serbo-Croatian (NP): Skupa je vidio [ti kola]. (“Expensive saw car”)

  • English (DP, ungrammatical): The/a expensive she sees car.

6
New cards

Adjunct Extraction (AE)

Extraction of adjuncts (like PPs) from within NP. Allowed in NP languages, blocked in DP languages.
Examples:

  • Serbo-Croatian (NP): Iz kojeg gradai je Ivan sreo [djevojke ti]? (“From which city did Ivan see girls?”)

  • English (DP, ungrammatical): From which city did Ivan see [girls ti]?

7
New cards

Negative Raising

Movement of negation from an embedded clause to the matrix clause; seen in DP languages, absent in NP languages.
Examples:

  • English (DP): John didn’t believe [that Mary would leave]

  • Serbo-Croatian (NP): Ivan ne vjeruje da bog postoji. (“Ivan doesn’t believe that God exists”) – negation does not move

8
New cards

Multiple Wh-Fronting

In NP languages, all interrogative words can be fronted to the clause-initial position, often in flexible order.
Examples:

  • Serbo-Croatian (NP): Ko koga vidi?/ Koga ko vidi? (“Who sees whom?”)

  • Bulgarian (DP): Koj kogo vižda? / ungrammatical Kogo koj vižda?

9
New cards

Bare Nouns in DP Languages

DP languages sometimes allow “bare” nouns in generic/mass contexts; the D may be silent.
Examples:

  • English: Lions roam the Serengeti

  • English: He loves to drink coffee

10
New cards

Languages with Mixed Properties

Some languages exhibit both NP and DP properties, e.g., optional bare nouns or articles.
Examples:

  • Hungarian bare NP: János könyvet olvas. (“John is reading a book/some books”)

  • Hungarian DP: Mari meghívta a barátokat a bulira. (“Mari invited her (the) friends to the party”)

  • Finnish bare NP: Kauniita minä katsoin lintuja. (“I was watching the beautiful birds”)

11
New cards

Demonstratives vs. Articles

Demonstratives can evolve into definite articles during grammaticalization.
Example:

  • Finnish: sen (demonstrative “that”) → eventual definite article in grammaticalization

12
New cards

Head + Modifier Agreement Blocking in DP Languages

Adjectives and modifiers cannot be extracted from DP due to the presence of D.
Example:

  • English: The red carRed she sees car

  • Swedish: Röda jag har sett den bilen

13
New cards

NP Language Flexibility in Word Order

NP languages with rich case morphology often allow more flexible word order of nominal constituents.
Example:

  • Serbo-Croatian: Skupa je vidio kola (“Expensive saw car”) – adjective can move outside NP

14
New cards

Finnish Mixed Behavior

Finnish lacks articles (NP) but shows DP-like behavior in negative raising; allows adjunct extraction but not LBE.
Examples:

  • Negative raising: Pekka ei uskonut että Sanni lähtee vasta huomenna. (“Pekka didn’t believe that Sanni would leave until tomorrow”)

  • LBE ungrammatical: Kauniita minä katsoin lintuja

15
New cards

Conclusions

  • Clear-cut classification of languages as NP or DP is not always possible.

  • Some languages conform neatly to DP or NP categories; others, like Hungarian and Finnish, exhibit mixed properties.

  • Implication for theory: Syntacticians must consider cross-linguistic variation and the possibility of languages that do not fit neatly into binary typologies.

  • The debate remains active and open, with continued relevance for Universal Grammar and nominal structure theory.

16
New cards

Key Takeaways

Feature/Test

DP Languages

NP Languages

Notes

Articles

Present (overt D)

Absent

Some NP languages have silent D?

Left-Branch Extraction

Blocked

Allowed

NP modifiers can move out of NP

Adjunct Extraction

Blocked

Allowed

PP or adjuncts can leave NP

Negative Raising

Allowed

Blocked

Negation may raise in matrix clause

Multiple Wh-Fronting

Restricted

Allowed

Order flexibility varies