1/24
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
some microscopic phenomena explained by wave optics
interference
diffraction
polarisation
wavefront
it is the locus of all particles of a medium, which are vibrating in the same phase
a line perpendicular to a wavefront is called a ray
spherical wavefront
when the source of light is a point source
its a sphere with the centre as source
(draw the diagram)
cylindrical wavefront
when the source of light is linear (straight line/ slit etc.)
it is cylindrical in shape
all points equidistant from the source lie on the cylinder
(draw the diagram)
plane wavefront
when the point/ linear source of light is at a very large distance
a small portion of the spherical/ cylindrical wavefront appears to be a plane
(draw the diagram)
huygen’s principle
each point on the wavefront (primary wavefront) is the source of a secondary disturbance (secondary wavelets), and these wavelets spread out in all directions with the speed of the wave
the energy of the wave travels perpendicular to the wavefront
a surface touching these secondary wavelets tangentially in the forward direction at any instant of time gives a new wavefront (secondary wavelength)
(draw the diagram)
why is there no backward secondary wavefront?
this is because the amplitude of the secondary wavefront is maximum in the forward direction and zero in the backward direction
derivation of laws of reflection using huygen’s principle
derive it
(first & second laws)
derivation of snell’s law using huygen’s principle
derive this
also prove that the frequency doesnt change after refraction
behaviour of prism towards plane wavefront
the speed of light waves is less in glass
hence, the lower portion of the incident wavefront (which travels through the greatest thickness of the prism) will get delayed
this results in a tilt in the emerging wavefront
(draw diagram)
behaviour of lens towards plane wavefront
the speed of light is less in lens
hence, the central portion of the incident wavefront travels through the thickest part and is delayed the most (convex lens)
this results in a depression at the centre of the refracted wavefront
thus, the wavefront becomes spherical and converges at the focus
(draw the diagram)
behaviour of spherical mirror towards plane wavefront
the central part of the incident wavefront travels the largest distance before reflection (concave mirror)
hence, the reflected wavefront gets delayed at the centre
this results in the reflected wavefront becoming spherical, which converges at the focus
coherent sources
they are sources of light which emit light waves of same wavelength, frequency and are in same phase or have constant phase difference
incoherent sources
they are sources of light which do not emit light waves with constant phase difference
interference term
when 2 independent sources of light emit monochromatic waves of intensities I1 & I2, and phase difference \phi meet at a point, then
resultant I = I1 + I2 + 2\sqrt{I1I2} \cos\phi
interference term when \cos\phi remains constant with time
in this case,
maximum value: when \cos\phi is 1
I = (\sqrt{I1} + \sqrt{I2} )²
minimum value: when \cos\phi is -1
I = (\sqrt{I1} - \sqrt{I2} )²
hence, it is clear that we need 2 sources with same frequency & constant phase difference
so, we need 2 coherent sources
inference term when \cos\phi various with time
assuming it varies with both positive and negative value, then the avg. value of \cos\phi over a full cycle is 0
hence, resultant I = I1 + I2
the 2 sources in this case are incoherent sources
conditions for obtaining 2 coherent sources of light
they should be obtained from a single source from some device, such as
the source and its virtual image (lloyd’s mirror)
2 virtual images of the same source (fresnel’s biprism)
two real images of the same source (young’s double slit)
the 2 sources should give monochromatic light
the path difference between light waves from both sources should be small
fringe
bright/ dark band on the screen formed due to the constructive/ destructive interference of light from the two slits
young’s double split experiment
supposing S1 and S2 are 2 slits distances d apart, with a screen distance D away. a source of light S with wavelength \lambda is passed through
constructive interference (bright fringes)
distance of nth bright fringe from midpoint O on the screen,
y = nD\lambda / d
destructive interference (dark fringes)
distance of nth dark fringe from midpoint O on the screen,
y = (2n - 1)D\lambda / 2d
where n = nth bright/ dark fringe
(draw diagram)
fringe width
it is the separation between any 2 consecutive bright & dark fringes
\beta = D\lambda / d
intensity of fringes
for bright fringe
\phi = 2n\pi
\cos\phi = 1
hence, I = I1 + I2 + 2\sqrt{I1I2}
I = 4Io (since in YDSE, I1 = I2 = Io)
for dark fringe
\phi = (2n - 1)\pi
\cos\phi = -1
hence, I = I1 + I2 - 2\sqrt{I1I2} = 0 (I1 = I2 = Io)
in general, the intensity at any point is
I = 4Iocos²(\phi /2)
what happens to the fringe width when its immersed in a medium with R.I \mu ?
it decreases \mu times
this is because the wavelength decreases
distribution of intensity
all bright interference fringes have intensity 4Io
all dark fringes have intensity 0
(draw diagram)
conditions for sustained interference
in order to get a well defined interference pattern, intensity of constructive should be maximum and destructive should be 0. the following conditions must be satisfied
the 2 sources of light should be coherent
the 2 interfering ways must have same plane of polarisation
the 2 sources must be very close to each other and the pattern must be observed at a larger distance
the sources must be monochromatic
otherwise, the fringes of diff. colors would overlap
the 2 waves must have same amplitude for better contrast btw. bright and dark