H2 Lewis- Single-species populations IV: Metapopulations and other spatially-structured populations

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
call with kaiCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/3

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 3:50 PM on 1/30/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

4 Terms

1
New cards

how does metapopulation dynamics inform conservation efforts?

knowt flashcard image
2
New cards

what is the lewis metapopulation model?

  • in fragmented ecosystems, the population of a species is controlled by the rate at which it colonises new patches and the rate of local extinction in patches

  • high colonisation + low extinction = a greater proportion (p) of patches occupied

  • colonisation rates change in a quadratic model, whereas extinction rates change in a linear model

this is still a semi-theoretical model, as it must be relatively rare, but still possible, for individuals to move between patches (without really affecting the population size, unless establishing a new population), and they must still be extinction-prone

  • otherwise it is just a mainland-island model, as one patch can still support a large, stable popualtion

<ul><li><p>in fragmented ecosystems, the population of a species is controlled by the rate at which it colonises new patches and the rate of local extinction in patches</p></li><li><p>high colonisation + low extinction = a greater proportion (p) of patches occupied</p></li></ul><ul><li><p><strong>colonisation rates change in a quadratic model, whereas extinction rates change in a linear model</strong></p></li></ul><p>this is still a semi-theoretical model, as it must be relatively <strong>rare</strong>, but still <strong>possible</strong>, for individuals to <strong>move </strong>between patches (without really affecting the population size, unless establishing a new population), and they must still be <strong>extinction-prone</strong></p><ul><li><p>otherwise it is just a mainland-island model, as one patch can still support a large, stable popualtion</p></li></ul><p></p>
3
New cards

why are fragmented populations more extinction-prone?

  • the fragmentation of habitats (anthropogenic or natural) leaves small patches of habitats with incomplete resources

  • these patches have much smaller carrying capacities and small existing populations, making species extinction-prone, because they are more susceptible to:

    • environmental stochasticity

    • demographic stochasticity

    • genetic effects (drift)

    • allee effects

4
New cards

what are the different kinds of fragmented populations? include examples

  • metapopulation- a population continually colonises patches and goes locally extinct, at relatively equal rates eg. the glanville fritillary butterfly lives in meadow fragments in an archipelago in finland

  • panmictic population- like a metapopulation, but the extinction rate is much lower than the colonisation rate, so patches are rarely not occupied eg. holly leafminer are very able to move between holly bushes

  • mainland-island- peripheral patches are periodically colonised by individuals from the large, stable mainland population, and can go extinct eg. edith’s checkerspot butterfly which needs serpentine grassland

  • source-sink- the sink is only occupied because the population is being continually topped up by immigration from the source population exporting individuals eg. sea rocket (source = beach, sink = dunes)