1/102
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
KQ1
Base of Catholic Church moved from Constantinople → increased tension b/w east and west
800
KQ1
The Great Schism
Papal authority left weak
Strained relationship b/w E + W
1054
KQ1
Battle of Manzikert
Byzantines defeated by Turks
Devastating for BE:
Displaced people went to Asia minor → increased strain on resource
Civil war
Had to increase taxes → financial crisis
1071
KQ1
Turks take over most of Anatolia → BE power restricted to Constantinople
Post Manzikert
KQ1
Seljuk Turks captured Jerusalem from the Fatimids
1073
KQ1
Papal authority left weak after investiture contest Pope Gregory VII excommunicated Emperor Henry IV
1076
KQ1
Cluniac revival - DIPLOMATIC CONTEXT FOR APPEAL OF 1ST CRUSADE
Reform movement started by GVII
Helped centralise authority + increase international prestige, power, + control in W Eu for papacy that was reduced by secular rulers + IC
Allowed for unified/well led/successful crusade
Started late 11th century
KQ1
Invasion from Normans further weakened BE
Early 1080s
KQ1
Relic Diplomacy (eg: to Henry IV of Germany + Robert of flanders)
increased relationship w/ west
1080s
KQ1
Alexios sent a delegation to Urban to ask for help against the Turks
1090
KQ1
Death of Sultan Malik Shah – led to divisions + civil war for succession
1092
KQ1
(NOT DATE)
What was Urban’s appeal for the crusade like?
Approach + tactics (+ example) (3):
Reasons for success (2):
Who was targeted (1)?
Approach + tactics:
Active approach (eg: letters + speeches + his Bishops preached crusade in their diocese)
Propaganda about treatment of Christians → us vs them
EG: Claremont (Nov 1095) → called for Crusade: ‘Whosoever for devotion alone …’ → remission of sins, emotive lang
Reasons for success:
Papal authority increased, unity b/w E + W Eu (bcs common enemy in Muslims)
Papal infallibility → important bcs increased support for Crusade bcs religious soc
Targeted:
Members of aristocracy (bcs military skills + temporal support)
KQ1
(NOT DATE)
What was the reaction to the appeal + what important figures joined? (3)
V eager → either material or spiritual gains → evidence call was staged to increase large scale support
Bishop of Le Puy joined → INCREASED SPIRITUAL CRED
Le Puy = high status so ensured other high profile Christians would join
Good Diplomat
Raymond of Toulouse pledged backing (temporal support)
Show serious commitment (handed over many possessions to monatry of St Gilles
Seen as heroic
KQ1
Council of Piacenza -
Urban’s attempt to reassert control over Christianity due to IC
Alexios sent envoys from Constantinople appealing for military help vs Muslims
March 1095
KQ1
Council of Clermont
Aims
Expand papal power
Wanted to win support of lords/knights + finally establish papal superiority after IC + GS
Hoped to stabilise western society from infighting
Appeal
Toured France in the months preparing for his message
Planned Sermon
Employed someone with a voice of authority, Bishop Adhemar of Puy became the leader of the first crusade
'God wills it'
Cross sewn onto clothes
Dramatized level of threat and exaggerated persecution of Christians in the East
REMISSION OF SINS
November 1095
KQ1
(NOT DATE)
What were the motivations of the Crusaders? (4)
RELIGIOUS: v religious soc, terrified of hell SO remission of sins
POLITICAL: Pope wanted to increase political power + some would see benefit of being his ally
TERRITORIAL: Some knights/princes had no land SO wanted to establish own power/kingdom (FOR ORDINARY CRUSADERS) oppurtunity to acquire loot + plunder
POVERTY: got less in inheritance bcs more children surviving, 1096: poor harvest in Fr, SO life in new land = escape from poverty
KQ1
First Crusade
1096-99
KQ1
People's Crusade - started
Led by Peter the Hermit
30,000 people (incl women + children) → poorly armed, inexperienced
From E France, S Germany, Rhineland
April 1096 (4 mnths before official Crusade was meant to leave)
KQ1
People's Crusade - during
Slaughtered many Jews in N France + Rhineland (bcs blamed ancestors for crucifixion) (date)
Issues:
Lacked supplies
1000s killed by king of Hungary for raiding his land,
Lacked military skills + dicipline
Alexios’ response: not happy bcs lacked military skills + dicipline SO left them in Asia Minor to wait for main crusade (esp bcs BE resources = strained)
B/w May - June 1096
KQ1
People’s Crusade - End
Turks crushed their attempted invasion into Nicea → only Survivers aggreed to convert/became slaves
Turks Massacred remaining People’s Crusade
Oct 1096
KQ1
Prince's Crusade set off for Holy Land
1096
KQ1
Journey across Anatolia
V demanding (bcs rocky mountains, hot in day + v cold at night, many horses died - so some had to walk, lack of food/water)
By end, ½ survived
Survived bcs: Tatikios navigated → not direct, but allowed for maintenance of supplied, safe passage through Christian areas+ strategic towns to be captured to keep rear of Crusaders safe
1097
KQ1 - Journey across Anatolia
Siege of Nicea
Crusaders marched unopposed toward Nicaea (date)
(date) Kilij Aslan approached with army, he was so outnumbered he had to retreat
After holding out for weeks Nicaea was taken (date)
Although Franks were disappointed b/c Alexios banned looting, they were happy as he gave them all cash instead
Gave city back to Alexios whom then returned to Constantinople as he was worried of internal divisions, he left his most loyal general, Tatikios in his place, who joined the council of leading princes
To crusaders, this looked like divine approval, aided motivation as they thought God was on their side.
Early May 1097
Mid-May 1097
June 1097
KQ1 - Journey across Anatolia
Battle of Dorylaeum:
Kilij Aslan’s forces = grown since Nicaea + launched attack
Crusaders won bcs of good tactics of Bohemund/God on side → increased confidence
July 1097
KQ1 - Journey across Anatolia
Tancred and Baldwin both set off separately with the same objective- to take land
Baldwin - for Alexios to further his lands
Tancred - for himself
Autumn 1097
KQ1
Capture of Edessa
Baldwin of Bolougne + Tancred led sub-groups capturing places (like Edessa) to clear large areas of enemies so maintain supplies + clear path to Antioch for main army
Baldwin invited to be ruler of Edessa → married local princess
Edessa = strategically improtant bcs fertile SO could provide food/other resource to states in less fertile
March 1098
KQ1
Siege of Antioch - CRUSADER STRENGTHS - SIEGE WAREFARE
City was well prepared. Had massive walls → used siege warfare → crusaders held position for months
The heat, disease and starvation killed thousands. Alexios sent supplies but it was never enough.
NEEDED it to gain Jerusalem bcs if not would leave rear of army exposed
Leadership = unstable + disputed
Bohemond had led attacks on Muslim forces (less allies for Antioch) :)
October 1097-June 1098
KQ1
Siege of Antioch
Bishop Adhemar said that reason for lack of success = sin
Ordered fast, prayer, + chastity
Princes swore publicly they would never desert, a fleet from Genoa arrived w/ reinforcements from England + Denmark
Morale lifted and religious conviction intensified
Jan 1098
KQ1
Siege of Antioch
Tatikios (Alexios's representative) and his byzantine troops went to get aid from Alexios
They never returned and in the same month, despite being outnumbered, the crusaders fought off a Muslim relief army that had been sent by Aleppo
The crusader's morale and skill was growing + Muslim morale was falling
Built siege towers (idk when)
Feb 1098
KQ1
Siege of Antioch (NOT DATE)
How did the crusaders get into Antioch + then what happened?
How?
Bohemund convinced Firuz (captain of one of Antioch’s garrison) to let them in
What?
Defeated the Muslims quickly
KQ1
Siege of Antioch
Kerbogha's (ruler of Mosul) forces were approaching
Crusaders faced the possibility of being trapped and destroyed outside the city if they could not break into the city and shelter inside its walls, many crusaders deserted.
May 1098
KQ1
Siege of Antioch
Peter Bartholomew found a fragment of the 'holy lance'
Lacked morale bcs only ~1/2 force left bcs many desertions
Lance = boosted morale for rest of expedition + from that point there were regular visions from God
14 June 1098
KQ1
Siege of Antioch
Prince's council, the fall of Antioch
Bohemund argued Alexios had failed to fulfil his duties SO they could break oath
He said he knew how to take Antioch but he wanted to keep the city for himself.
Stephen of Blois and his troops deserted.
Bohemund had made contact with a Christian who was inside the walls of the city, he dropped a rope down the walls and a small group of knights climbed over and opened the main gate.
The crusaders poured into the city crying 'God wills it' and massacred the Muslims.
Kerbogha's army arrived that night. The crusaders were safe but trapped inside the city.
June 1098
KQ1
Siege of Antioch
Crusaders launched an counter attack
Tight knit formation marched out under expert leadership of Bohemund and bishop Adhemar, carrying the holy lance
Some claimed to have seen a host of saints on white horses
Kerbogah = caught off guard + troops fled
BOHEMUND OF TARANTO BECOMES RULER OF ANTIOCH
28 June 1098
KQ1
Bishop of Le Puy died
August 1098
KQ1
Siege of Mar’arat al Numan → CRUSADER STRENGTHS → PSYCHOLOGICAL WAREFARE
Rumours of cannibalism → scared surrounding
Other territories fled/let them through (eg: Sultan Ibn Mungidh supplied them w/ provisions, horses, + guides)
Got to Jerusalem quicker
late 1098
KQ1
Jerusalem - arrived (DATE)
Speed of their advance surprised Fatimids BUT
They were exposed bcs left cities like Acre unconquured
Had small army divided on each side of J (DIVISION - barely communicated, led by Godfrey + Raymod)
Low supplies for siege tower (+ blocked from port to get it)
Low water + Fatimids poisoned wells
Issues w/ who would rule J broke out
June 1099
KQ1
Jerusalem capture by crusaders
Prompted by visions of god - crusaders fasted + confessed sins
Crusaders still inspired/determined
Saw Saints + Adhemar fighting with them (RELIGIOUS FERVOUR)
2 siege towers built: Fatimids had to split forced to defend, then Godfrey suggested dismantling/rebuilding one to a less defended area + led assault → rained down on Fatimids + gained access
July 1099
KQ1
(NOT DATE)
What were the reasons for the success of the first crusade?
Crusader strengths
Muslim weaknesses
Diplomatic context
KQ1
(NOT DATE)
What were the Crusaders strengths in the first crusade? (5)
Psychological warfare
Siege warfare
Religious fervour
Cavalry
Leadership
KQ1 - Crusaders strengths in the first crusade
Psychological warfare:
Ma-arat an-Numan (DATE)
Rumours of cannibalism → scared surrounding
Other territories fled/let them through (eg: Sultan Ibn Mungidh supplied them w/ provisions, horses, + guides)
Got to Jerusalem quicker
Ma-arat an-Numan: Late 1098
KQ1 - Crusaders strengths in the first crusade
Siege warfare:
Siege towers (eg: Antioch (DATE) → surrounded for months till Firuz let them in)
Antioch: Oct 1097 - June 1098
KQ1 - Crusaders strengths in the first crusade
Religious fervour:
Holy Lance (DATE) (increased moral, emboldened crusaders → felt invincible bcs god’s support)
‘Whosoever …’ (penance → v motivated bcs of goal)
Holy Lance: June 1098
KQ1 - Crusaders strengths in the first crusade
Cavalry:
Effective in battle (eg: Ascalon (DATE) - calvary tactics decisively defeated fatimids
Ascalon: 1099
KQ1 - Crusaders strengths in the first crusade
Leadership:
Bohemond:
V experiences soldier, knowledge of Muslim tactics Dorylaeum (DATE) = increased confidence of crusaders
Antioch (DATE)= convinced Firuz to let them in
Damascus (DATE) = decisive victory
Godfrey of Bouillon:
Kept focus, dismantled/rebuilt siege towers at Jerusalem to get over walls (DATE)
Bishop of Le Puy:
Religious support/diplomat
Dorylaeum: July 1097
Antioch: Oct 1097 - June 1098
Damascus: 1098
Jerusalem: July 1099
KQ1 - Muslim weakness in the first crusade
Sultan of Rum died at Antioch before crusade (DATE) → 5 yrs of fighting → when ended = v weak → too weak to attack → OPPURTUNITY
Antioch = division, so increased weakness (FACT NOT DATE)
Shia/Sunni split: Jerusalem b/w them almost constantly for years before (WHAT DID THIS CAUSE?)
Kerboga’s army deserted him at Antioch (DATE)
Post defeat at Dorylaeum (DATE) → less support for Sultan of Rum → neighbouring territory let Crusaders through
Sultan of Rum died at Antioch: 1086
Antioch Division: Aleppo/Damascus armies refused to work together
Jerusalem b/w Shia/Sunni almost constantly = Leadership was weak, unestablished, + vulnerable
Antioch: June 1098
Dorylaeum: 1098
KQ1 - Muslim weakness in the first crusade
(FACT NOT DATE)
What were the Muslim battle tactics?
What were the issue with these?
Muslim battle tactics:
Mounted Bowmen
Artillery
Bombardment/intimidation (eg: shouting/howling)
Issue:
Not used to Crusader’s thick chainmail/cloth SO unequipped to deal w/ it
KQ1 - Crusader leadership in the first crusade
(FACT NOT DATE)
What was Bohemond’s leadership?
V experiences soldier, knowledge of Muslim tactics Dorylaeum ( July 1097) = increased confidence of crusaders
Antioch (Oct 1097 - June 1098)= convinced Firuz to let them in
Damascus (1098) = decisive victory
KQ1 - Crusader leadership in the first crusade
(FACT NOT DATE)
What was Tancred’s leadership?
Bohemond’s nephew
Strong warrior
KQ1 - Crusader leadership in the first crusade
(FACT NOT DATE)
What was Bishop of Le Puy’s leadership?
Religious support/diplomat
KQ1 - Crusader leadership in the first crusade
(FACT NOT DATE)
What was Robert of Normandy’s leadership?
Brought other men (eg: Robert of Flanders)
KQ1 - Crusader leadership in the first crusade
(FACT NOT DATE)
What was Raymond of Toulouse’s leadership?
1st Noble to join
Hoped to be acknowledged as main leader bcs of this
KQ1 - Crusader leadership in the first crusade
(FACT NOT DATE)
What was Baldwin of Boulogne's leadership?
Godfrey’s younger brother
Joined when in Constantinople
1st king of Jerusalem
KQ1 - Crusader leadership in the first crusade
(FACT NOT DATE)
What were the divisions in leadership?
Normans vs Non-Normans
Bohemond vs Raymond
Tancred vs Baldwin: Autumn 1097 → separately set off to gain land (T for self, B for Alexios), when met in Mamistra they broke into fight (Baldwin W)
BUT for most part = united by common aim → SUCCESS OF CRUSADE
KQ2 - Establishment + development of Outremer (including Jerusalem + Antioch)
Overview:
A king was chosen to rule
More land/territory was captured (DATE), which were formed three provinces, counties of: Antioch, Edessa + Tripoli
Counties = organised in same way as European feudal states (land allocated to lesser nobles who gave rulers armed support when needed)
Legal/political structures = like those in W Europe, w/ king as feudal overlord
B/w 1100-30
KQ2 - Establishment + development of Outremer (including Jerusalem + Antioch)
(FACT NOT DATE)
Why was the survival of Outremer uncertain, and what would it depend on?
Uncertain bcs:
Most crusaders returned home → left only a few thousand to establish/hold the States
Survival would depend on:
Muslim disunity
Alliances + western aid
Military Orders
Castles
KQ2 - Establishment + development of Outremer (including Jerusalem + Antioch)
(FACT NOT DATE)
What challenges did Outremer face?
(4)
Aid from the west declined
Relations w/ Byzantium deteriorated (to the point it was actively seeking Muslim aid vs Outremer)
Development of jihad
Internal instability (especially succession issues)
KQ2 Establishment + development of Outremer (including Jerusalem + Antioch)
Edessa establishment:
First State founded – captured from Byzantine ruler (DATE)
1st ruled by Baldwin I (of Boulogne) → became Count of Edessa
Was strategically placed in Armenia → possession of Edessa = helpful in keeping Antioch secure
Was fertile in comparison to the regions in the south SO a crucial source of food
Captured from Byzantine ruler: 1098
KQ2 Establishment + development of Outremer (including Jerusalem + Antioch)
(FACT NOT DATE)
Edessa development:
How did Baldwin initially help w/ development? (2)
In theory, Edessa should have been returned to Byzantium bcs of the oath w/ Alexios BUT Baldwin kept control bcs he possessed it
Within short period of time, Baldwin acquired a lot of treasure, married a local princess, + adopted many Arab habits (integrated)
KQ2 Establishment + development of Outremer (including Jerusalem + Antioch)
(FACT NOT DATE)
Edessa development:
What was Baldwin’s treatment of his inhabitants? (2)
How did dedicated crusaders react to some of his decisions? (1)
Treatment of inhabitants:
Included local inhabitants in his gov (but control = maintained by the Franks) in hopes integration of diff groups would increase stability
Muslims = granted religious toleration, but, bcs unreliable allies, Baldwin didn’t trust them w/ much power
Dedicated Crusade reaction:
Didn’t like this → thought Muslims shouldn’t be given freedom of worship + felt Baldwin was going against aims of Crusade
KQ2 Establishment + development of Outremer (including Jerusalem + Antioch)
(FACT NOT DATE)
Edessa development:
Who were the first 3 leaders of Edessa?
What did Joscelin I do in development of Edessa?
Who were the first few leaders of Edessa?
Baldwin became King of Jerusalem (1100) → Baldwin Le Bourcq (his cousin), became Count of Edessa
Baldwin Le Bourqu became Baldwin II of Jerusalem (1118) → Joscelin I became Count
What did Joscelin I do in development of Edessa?
Managed to extend his rule towards Aleppo
KQ2 Establishment + development of Outremer (including Jerusalem + Antioch)
(FACT NOT DATE)
What were the issues in Edessa?
(2)
Suffered extensively from Muslim raids + internal rivalries SO no longer the rich city like when first taken
Powerful earthquake in 1114 made situation worse
KQ2 Establishment + development of Outremer (including Jerusalem + Antioch)
Establishment of Antioch:
Taken (DATE)
Was under Bohemund, but struggled to maintain position vs local Armenian + Byzantine warlords → captured by the Danishmends (Turkish tribe) when trying to take the city of Melitene
Was imprisoned b/w (DATE) (his nephew, Tancred ruled as regent)
Bohemond defeated at Harran (DATE) → left the east in (DATE) → Tancred became Prince
Taken: 1098
Bohemond imprisoned: 1100-3
Bohemond defeated at Harran: 1104
Bohemond left the east: 1105
KQ2 Establishment + development of Outremer (including Jerusalem + Antioch)
(FACT NOT DATE)
What was the development of Antioch?
(4)
Tancred + his successor (Roger of Salerno, ruler 1113-19) expanded territory
Tancred's administration = similar to former Byzantine rulers BUT relied on Norman officials, who he trusted
When attacked by local Muslim rulers, he avoided pitched battles, SO preserved limited manpower
Constructed network of allies on his borders, allowing the State to survive
KQ2 Establishment + development of Outremer (including Jerusalem + Antioch)
Establishment of Tripoli
Raymond of Toulouse made no gains in Antioch/Jerusalem bcs of his rivals SO established Tripoli w/ support of others w/ minimal gains
Captured Tortosa in (DATE) → advanced on Tripoli (main port for Damascus SO useful/strategic)
Founded by Raymond (DATE)
Captured Tortosa: 1102
Tripoli founded: 1103
KQ2 Establishment + development of Outremer (including Jerusalem + Antioch)
Development of Tripoli
R of Toulouse built castle on Mount Pilgrim BUT died in (DATE), before Tripoli was fully captured + left disputed succession behind him
(DATE): Tripoli fully taken despite unsuccessful siege by Muslim military leader Toghteki
R of T died: 1105
Tripoli FULLY taken: 1109
KQ2 Establishment + development of Outremer (including Jerusalem + Antioch)
(FACT NOT DATE)
What was an issue w/ Tripoli?
Divided into separate semi-independent lordships → SO haphazard political structure
KQ2 Establishment + development of Outremer (including Jerusalem + Antioch)
(FACT NOT DATE)
What was the establishment of Jerusalem?
(5)
Led by Godfrey of Bouillon
Daimbert of Pisa wanted to succeed him, + Godfrey agreed bcs needed military support
BUT when Godfrey died (1100) heir = unclear
Daimbert wasn’t in Jerusalem at time, so Godfrey's supporters sent an urgent message to Baldwin of Edessa, Godfrey's brother, to take over
Was possibility of civil war, but Daimbert lacked support SO Christmas 1100 Baldwin = king of Jerusalem
KQ2
Baldwin I becomes King of Jerusalem
1100
KQ2 -
Godfrey uses Pisan fleets in Palestine to intimidate near Muslim territory (eg: Acre)
Early 1100
Genoese help Baldwin at Arsuf
1101
Capture of Acre w/ Genoese (port)
1104
Count Baldwin II was in captivity, Tancred tried to claim he had the right to have Edessa and called on Muslim allies for help
1104
Tancred acted as regent in Edessa after Baldwin was captured in1104
until 1105
Capture of Tripoli w/ Genoese (port)
1109
Baldwin I of Jerusalem died childless despite two marriages, and factions at court backed different candidates to succeed him.
Baldwin II of Le Bourcq became king but when he was later captured, questions were asked about whether he should be replaced.
1116
Battle of Ager Sanguinis
1119
Founding of the Templars
1119
Tyre captured w/ Venetians
1124
Zengi occupied Aleppo
1128
Fall of Edessa to Zengi
1144
Eugenius III issued the Quantum Praedecessores
1145
Preaching tour of Bernard of Clairvaux
1146
Death of Zengi
1146
Second Crusade
1147-49
German crusade against the Wends
1147
Siege of Lisbon
1147
Failure to capture Damascus
1148
Battle of Inab
1149
Capture of Ascalon by Crusaders
1153
Almaric starts attacks on Egypt
1163
Death of Nur ad-Din
1174
Saladin in control of Damascus
1174
Battle of Hattin
1187
Third Crusade
1189-92
Siege of Jerusalem by King Guy
1189
Death of Frederick Barbarossa
1190
Departure of Philip II and Richard I
1190
Battle of Arsuf
1191
Crusaders captured Acre
1191