McCulloch v Maryland

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 2 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/3

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Unit 1

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

4 Terms

1
New cards

Background

A federal bank was built in Baltimore, Maryland. Maryland passed a law where the federal court had to pay taxes

2
New cards

Arguments:

  1. Maryland argued that the establishment of a national bank was unconstitutional. Article 1 Section 8, contained did not say that Congress had the power to create a bank

  2. McCulloch’s lawyers argued that the bank was constitutional. Article 1 section 8 contained the necessary and proper clause

3
New cards

Decision

Chief justice John Marshall argued that the bank was constitutional on the authority of the national and proper clause

4
New cards

What did this case establish?

  1. The supremacy of national laws against state laws

  2. The Constitution grants Congress implied powers (powers not directly said in the Constitution)