Chapter 14- Competition

0.0(0)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/62

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

63 Terms

1
New cards

Interspecific Interaction

Interactions between different species

2
New cards

Competiton

-/- interaction between 2 species

3
New cards

Schoener’s 6 Mechanisms of Competition

  1. Consumption

  2. Preemptive

  3. Overgrowth

  4. Chemical (allelopathy)

  5. Territorial

  6. Encounter

4
New cards

Consumptive mechanism of competition

  • One organism inhibits another by consuming a shared nutrient resource

  • Two mice species competing for food

5
New cards

Preemptive mechanism of competition

  • One organism occupies space, preventing another from having it

  • Two species of barnacle competing for space on rock

6
New cards

Overgrowth mechanism of competition

  • One organism growths directly over another

  • One species of tree grows over another to access light, shading the smaller tree

7
New cards

Chemical (allelopathy) mechanism of competition

  • Chemical warfare between competitors

  • Common among Mediterranean and desert plants

8
New cards

Territorial mechanism of competition

  • Aggressive behavioral exclusion of an organism from another’s defended territory

  • Wolves defending territories

9
New cards

Encounter mechanism of competition

  • Non-territorial encounters reducing growth

10
New cards

Resources

  • Substances or factors that are consumed by an organism to survive and support population growth with increasing availability

  • When reduced the result is reduced population growth

  • Food, light, water, nutrients, space

11
New cards

Resources Examples

Food, light, water, nutrients, space

12
New cards

What are conditions?

  • May affect growth and reproduction, but they are not consumed by organisms,

  • Are not resources for which species compete

  • Ex: Temperature, pH, salinity

13
New cards

Conditions Example

  • Ex: Temperature, pH, salinity

14
New cards

What is the outcome of competition determined by?

  • Determined by competition for the limiting resource

15
New cards

Exploitation Competition

Occurs because individuals reduce the supply of shared resources as they use it

16
New cards

Interference Competition

One species directly interferes with the ability of its competitors to use a limiting resource

17
New cards

Liebig’s Law of the Minimum

  • Limitations on growth not determined by total resources available, but rather availability of scarcest resource

  • i.e, resource that is the limiting factor

<ul><li><p>Limitations on growth not determined by total resources available, but rather availability of scarcest resource </p></li><li><p>i.e, resource that is the limiting factor</p></li></ul><p></p>
18
New cards

Alleopathy

One species releases toxins harmful to others

19
New cards

Each population increases until…

The supply of some limiting resource becomes depleted

Note: Living things need nutrient resources in relatively fixed ratios to survive and grow

<p>The supply of some limiting resource becomes depleted</p><p>Note: Living things need nutrient resources in relatively fixed ratios to survive and grow</p>
20
New cards

The importance of the concept of the fundamental and realized niche

It is central to understanding the intensity of competition

21
New cards

Fundamental Niche

  • Niche in the absence of competition

  • Represents the resources a species could utilize (theoretically) in the absence of all species interactions (including competition)

<ul><li><p>Niche in the absence of competition </p></li><li><p>Represents the resources a species could utilize (theoretically) in the absence of all species interactions (including competition)</p></li></ul><p></p>
22
New cards

Realized Niche

  • Niche with competiton

  • Represents the resources actually utilized by the species after the effects of all species interactions (including competition)

<ul><li><p>Niche with competiton</p></li><li><p>Represents the resources actually utilized by the species after the effects of all species interactions (including competition)</p></li></ul><p></p>
23
New cards

What does the superior competitor have the largest effect against its competitor?

  • Abundance and distribution of its competitor

  • Fundamental niche= Niche in absence of competition

  • Realized Niche= Niche with competition

<ul><li><p>Abundance and distribution of its competitor</p></li><li><p>Fundamental niche= Niche in absence of competition</p></li><li><p>Realized Niche= Niche with competition</p></li></ul><p></p>
24
New cards
<p>What is this photo an example of?</p>

What is this photo an example of?

  • Asymmetric competition in the rocky intertidal zone

25
New cards
<p><span>Asymmetric competition </span></p>

Asymmetric competition

  • occurs when the effects of competing species on each other are not equal

  • This is almost always the case in nature

26
New cards
<p>When does intensity of competition increase?</p>

When does intensity of competition increase?

  • With degree of niche overlap and scarcity of associated resources

27
New cards
<p>What does greater niche overlap mean?</p>

What does greater niche overlap mean?

  • The greater the intensity of competition

28
New cards
<p>Resource Abundance</p>

Resource Abundance

  • The lower the abundance of the resources for which the species compete, the greater the intensity of competition

29
New cards

Amensalism

  • Term used to describe the most extreme form of asymmetric competition

  • i.e where one species is affected negatively, and the other is not affected at all

30
New cards

What type of interaction is amensalism (±/0)

-/0

<p>-/0</p>
31
New cards
<p>G.F Gause Experiment #1</p>

G.F Gause Experiment #1

  • Protists P. caudatum and P. bursaria were grown both in isolation and together in a liquid medium of bacteria and yeast (2 possible
    sources of food).

  • Species demonstrated competitive coexistence, each reducing the abundance of the other, but both persisting.

  • This occurred because P. caudatum consumed only bacteria (and
    was the superior competitor for bacteria), while P. bursaria was able
    to consume both bacteria and yeast.

32
New cards
<p>G.F Gause Experiment #2</p>

G.F Gause Experiment #2

  • Protists P. caudatum and P. auralia were grown both in isolation and together in a liquid medium of bacteria and yeast (same 2 possible sources of food).

  • P. caudatum experienced competitive exclusion (its abundance
    declined to ‘0’) as a result of competing with P. auralia.

  • This occurred because P. caudatum and P. auralia both consumed
    only bacteria, and P. auralia was the superior competitor for bacteria

33
New cards
<p>What did Gause propose as the result of his two experiments?</p>

What did Gause propose as the result of his two experiments?

  • The competitive exclusion principle

  • Original version: Two species cannot coexist when limited by the same resource

  • New modified version:

  • Competitors that use a limiting resource in the same way cannot coexist.

34
New cards

Original version of Competitive Exclusion Principle

  • Two species cannot coexist when limited by the same resource

35
New cards

New Modified version of Competitive Exclusion Principles

  • Competitors that use a limiting resource in the same way cannot coexist

36
New cards

How can species coexist consuming the same limiting resources?

  • Through resource partitioning

  • Also known as niche partitioning

37
New cards

Schoener findings in Anolis lizards

  • found that Anolis lizards of different species had the same food sources (the same limiting resources) but coexisted by specializing on feeding from different places in the plant canopy and in the sun or in the shade

38
New cards
<p>When do two species engage in resource partitioning?</p>

When do two species engage in resource partitioning?

  • When they utilize the same limiting resource in different ways

39
New cards

Overtime evolutionary time what can competition between closely related species drive

  • Character displacement

40
New cards

Character displacement

  • An evolutionary process where two similar species, when coexisting in the same environment, diverge in certain traits (like morphology, behavior, or physiology) to reduce competition for resources, resulting in greater differences between them compared to when they are found in separate environments. 

41
New cards
<p>More Niche Overlap</p>

More Niche Overlap

  • When species first come together in the same place

42
New cards
<p>Less Niche Overlap</p>

Less Niche Overlap

  • As a result of natural selection over evolutionary time, the two species increasingly specialize on food of differing size, reducing competition

43
New cards
<p>Character Displacement Example</p>

Character Displacement Example

  • Patterns consistent with the operation of character displacement have been observed among Darwin’s finches over the Galapagos Islands

  • Differences in beak depth correlate with specialization on specific sources of food

44
New cards

Lotka-Volterra Model For Competition Formula

Species 1: dN1 /dt = r 1 N1 (K1 – N1 – αN2 )/K1

Species 2: dN2 /dt = r 2 N2 (K2 – N2 – βN1 )/K2

45
New cards

What does α mean in Lotka- Volterra Model for competition represent

The effect an individual of species 2 has on the population growth of species 1

46
New cards

What does β mean in Lotka- Volterra Model for competition represent

The effect an individual of species 1 has on the population growth of species 2

47
New cards

If α > 1.0, then sp. 2 …

individuals carry greater weight than sp. 1 individuals.

48
New cards

If α = 1.0, then sp. 2…

individuals carry the same weight as sp. 1 individuals.

49
New cards

If α < 1.0, then sp. 2 individuals…

carry less weight than sp. 1 individuals. Same relationships with β

50
New cards

What does a Higher competition coefficient (β, α) mean?

A higher competition coefficient indicates that the species has a greater negative effect on the growth rate of its competitor.

51
New cards

What does a Higher carrying capacity (K) mean?

  • A higher carrying capacity indicates that the species uses available resources more efficiently.

  • Four possible outcomes to L-V competition are based on the relative K and α/β of the two species.

52
New cards

Species 1 Zero- Growth Isocline formula

N1 = K1 – αN2

53
New cards

Species 2 Zero- Growth Isocline formula


N2 = K2 – βN1

54
New cards

Components of Zero Growth Isocline Graph Species 1

X- intercept: K1 (Math: N1=K1-α(0): N1=K1)

Y-intercept: K1/α (Math: 0=K1-αN2: N2=K1/α)

Population size of species 1 increases below zero growth isocline line

55
New cards

Components of Zero Growth Isocline Graph Species 2

X- intercept: K2/β (Math: 0=K2-βN1: N1=K2/β)

Y-intercept: K2 (Math: N2=K2-0: N2=K2)

Population size of species 2 increases below zero growth isocline line

56
New cards
<p>What does model tell us about competative coexistence</p>

What does model tell us about competative coexistence

  • The largest population size that Species 2 can maintain is K2 (its carrying capacity). This is much lower than the population size required to exclude species 1 (K1 /α).

  • Species 1 is also a weak competitor (β <1.0). It isn’t able to exclude species 2 for the same reason.

  • The Species 2 population size required to exclude Species 1 is very high (K1 /α). This is because Species 2 is a weak competitor (α <1.0).

  • Takeaway: Competing species coexist when they do not compete strongly with each other. In the natural world, this occurs when species use limiting resources in different ways.

  • Scenario:
    K1 = K2
    α = β = 0.4

57
New cards
<p><span style="color: #000000">Outcome 1: Species 1 excludes species 2.</span><span style="color: #000000"><br></span><span style="color: #000000">(Species 1 wins.)</span></p>

Outcome 1: Species 1 excludes species 2.
(Species 1 wins.)

  • This occurs when the isocline for species 1 lies entirely above the isocline for species 2.

  • Mathematically, this occurs when both βK1 > K2 and αK2 < K1 .

58
New cards
<p><span style="color: #000000">Outcome 2: Species 2 excludes species 1.</span><span style="color: #000000"><br></span><span style="color: #000000">(Species 2 wins.)</span></p>

Outcome 2: Species 2 excludes species 1.
(Species 2 wins.)

  • This occurs when the isocline forspecies 2 lies entirely above the isocline for species 1.

  • Mathematically, this occurs whenboth βK1 < K2 and αK 2 > K1 .

59
New cards
<p><span style="color: #000000">Outcome 3: Winner depends on initial conditions.</span></p>

Outcome 3: Winner depends on initial conditions.

This occurs when the isoclines
cross and:
• On N1 axis, the intercept for
species 1 isocline is greater
than the intercept for species 2
isocline.
• On N2 axis, the intercept for
species 2 isocline is greater
than the intercept for species 1
isocline.
• Mathematically, this occurs when
both βK 1 > K2 and αK 2 > K1 .

60
New cards
<p><span style="color: #000000">Outcome 4: Species 1 and 2 coexist</span></p>

Outcome 4: Species 1 and 2 coexist

This occurs when the isoclines
cross and:
• On N1 axis, the intercept for
species 1 isocline is less than
the intercept for species 2
isocline.
• On N2 axis, the intercept for the
species 2 isocline is less than
the intercept for the species 1
isocline.
• Mathematically, this occurs when
both βK 1 < K2 and αK 2 < K1 .

61
New cards

The outcome of competition can be influenced by predation and herbivory

  • Predators sometimes suppress dominant competitors, preventing competitive exclusion of inferior competitor species

  • Sea stars preferentially consume Balanus (the superior competitor) but not Chthamalus (the inferior competitor, in Connells 1961 experiment

62
New cards

A.G Tansley experiment demonstrated…

  • competition between closely related species.

  • Galium saxatile: normally found on
    acid, peaty soils.

  • Galium sylvestre: normally found on
    limestone hills and pastures.

  • Experiment:
    The two species were grown alone
    and together on in each of the two
    different soil types

63
New cards
<p><span style="color: #000000">Tansley’s results:</span></p>

Tansley’s results:

  • Grown alone, each species performed
    better on its preferred soil, but could
    also grow on other soil.

  • Grown together, each species overgrew
    and shaded the other species on their
    preferred soil type.

  • Conclusion: Each species was at a
    disadvantage in competition when not
    grown on their preferred soil type.

  • Takeaway: Outcome of competition
    between species can depend on
    environment.