1/36
Unit
Name  | Mastery  | Learn  | Test  | Matching  | Spaced  | 
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Blocking
The blocking stimulus has a previously established relationship with the US before compound conditioning
Overshadowing
one stimuli produces a higher response than the other because it is stronger (salience/relevance/intense)
Which variable about the US-CS relationship that affects conditioning is considered the most important and predictive?
correlation
systematic desensitization
a behavioral technique that involves gradually exposing someone to an anxiety-producing object, thought, or experience whilst simultaneously performing relaxation techniques to reduce anxiety
higher order conditioning
Psychological learning process where a neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus by pairing it with a previously existing conditioning stimulus
sensory preconditioning
initially pair two neutral stimuli (S1 and S2) together. Once S1 is paired with an unconditioned stimuli to be a CS that elicits a conditioned response, S2 becomes a CS for the same CR
Acquisition
The initial establishing and strengthening of the CS
Extinction
process where CS is presented in the absence of the US. CR to weaken and eventually disappears
Spontaneous Recovery
after a rest period, without learning any new trials, a previously extinguished CR reappears. Usually shorter and weaker than CR
Generalization and Discrimination
Whether you generalize or discriminate between stimuli usually depends on the similarity of the learned CS
UR — Unconditioned Response
unlearned, automatically occurring response to the unconditioned stimuli
CS - Conditioned Stimulus
An originally neutral stimulus that, after association with a US, triggers a CR
CR - Conditioned Response
Learned response to previously neutral CS
Aversion Therapy
pair a painful US with CS to produce a learned aversive response (CR) to CS alone
Factors affecting rate of extinction
1) Number of trials during the acquisition phase 
2) reinforcement schedule
Types of exposure therapy
Flooding and Systematic desensitization
variables about the stimuli that affect the conditioning process
intensity of stimulus (strength + salience)
familiarity/previous experience
biological relevance between the CS and the US
presence of extraneous stimuli (overshadowing, blocking, etc.)
characteristics of the CS and US that affect conditioning
CS-US Order
CS-US Interval
CS-US Correlation
# of CS-US pairings
Inhibitory conditioning
occurs when a CS reliably predicts the absence of the US meaning the UR will not occur
Conditioned Emotional Response (CER)
When CR is an emotional response
Aversive Conditioning
when the arrival of the US is a negative event (ex: shock conditioning)
Appetitive conditioning
When the arrival of the US is a positive event (ex: food)
classical excitatory conditioning
CS elicits a CR that is similar or identical to the UR
Classical Inhibitory conditioning
CS elicits a CR that is different or opposite to the UR
Positive contingency
Classical excitatory conditioning
presence of one stimuli doesn’t occur without the other
CS and US are correlated in a way that one predicts the other
CS consistently followed by US
Negative contingency
inhibitory conditioning
presence of one stimuli does not occur with the other
CS and US are in some way correlated with each other such that one predicts the absence of the other
CS constantly followed by absence of US
classical conditioning occurs when…
one stimuli reliably precedes and serves a signal for another stimuli
methods used to study classical conditioning
human: eyeblink response, skin conductance
animal: eyeblink, conditioned emotional response (fear)
Forward conditioning
Delay: overlapping stimuli (most effective)
Trace: gap between presentation of CS and US
Delay conditioning
forward conditioning, A tone sounds (CS) before (overlapping) the food is presented (overlapping)
Simultaneous CS-US Order
onset of CS and US at the same time - least effective
Backward CS-US Order
US onset followed by the CS - not very effective
CS-US Interval
Optimal Interstimulus interval is 200 ms - 2 sec.
Exception of taste aversion
optimal number of CS-US trials
generally, the more trials the better, until you reach an asymptotic point of learning
number of trials relation to learning
the more trials that occur during acquisition, the stronger the learning will be
Pavlov’s Contiguity Theory
tried to explain classical conditioning in terms of neural activity in the brain
necessary conditions: CS and US that produce neural activity
sufficient conditions: neural activity from both should overlap in time