1/87
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
visual field
the extent of object space visible while the eye steadily fixates a target; the projection into object space of all parts of the retina responsive to the stimulus being used & not obstructed by facial anatomy
~120deg
what is the binocular VF?
~65deg
what is the extent of the absolute nasal field?
~75deg
what is the extent of the absolute superior field?
~75deg
what is the extent of the absolute inferior field?
~100deg
what is the extent of the absolute temporal field?
~60deg
what is the extent of the relative nasal field?
~60deg
what is the extent of the relative superior field?
~75deg
what is the extent of the relative inferior field?
~100deg
what is the extent of the relative temporal field?
hill of vision
3D model of VF sensitivity, X & Y axes are location & Z axis is sensitivity at that location
kinetic
type of field test where the target comes from the side (approaches HOV from the side), moving target, same illumination & size
static
type of field test where the target is fixed size & intensity of brightness varies, approaches HOV from above
51dB
what is the dimmest stimulus on a field test?
0dB
what is the brightest stimulus on a field test?
28-38dB
what is the foveal threshold?
40dB
__ is typically the least intense stimulus visible by humans
unilateral monocular VF defects
1 eye is affected
bilateral monocular VF defects
both eyes affected but from different lesions
same disease, e.g. glaucoma
different diseases
binocular VF defects
same lesion affecting both eyes
generalized depression
all locations w/in VF show reduced sensitivity (ex: cataract, advanced glaucoma)
depression
an area of decreased sensitivity not necessarily surrounded by normal field (don’t know what the field beyond it looks like)
scotoma
distinct area surrounded by normal field
OS
which eye is shown on the field if the blindspot is on the left side?
OD
which eye is shown on the field if the blindspot is on the right side?
Bjerrum’s area
coincides w/ anatomy of RNFL
extends from blind spot
does not cross nasal horizontal midline of VF
may be isolated scotoma w/in Bjerrum’s area
describe monocular VF defects: arcuate scotoma & nasal step
superior
inferior notching at the nerve will result in a ______ arcuate defect
altitudinal
2 quadrants of the field affected
temporal
nasal & temporal ganglion cell axons from the macula enter the _____ portion of the ONH
cecocentral or paracentral scotoma
what sort of defect will an issue w/ the nasal & temporal RGCs from the macula cause?
nasal
peripheral nasal ganglion cell axons enter the _____ portion of the optic disc
wedge shaped temporal scotoma extending from blind spot
what sort of defect will an issue with the peripheral nasal ganglion cell axons cause?
macula
peripheral nasal ganglion cell axons
ganglion cell axons temporal to disc
what 3 parts is the RNFL divided into?
superior & inferior
ganglion cell axons temporal to the optic disc (except macular fibes) enter _________ poles
F
T/F: fibers temporal to optic disc cross the horizontal raphe of temporal retina
arcuate defect, paracentral scotoma w/in Bjerrum’s area, nasal step of Ronne
what sort of defect can an issue with the arcuate bundle & peripheral temporal retinal fibers cause?
horizontal, vertical
NFL defects respect the nasal ______ VF meridian but not the _____ meridian
numeric
actual values in dB on the VF printout
grayscale
good plot for pt demonstration on the VF printout
total deviation
difference in dB b/t the pt’s results & age-corrected normal on the VF printout
pattern deviation
difference from expected based on pt’s own calculated HOV on the VF printout
highlights significant localized loss & ignored generalized field loss
probability that a given point is deviant from the average normal values
1/20 points will be below the p<5% level
location of points should be random, not clustered
describe a normal pattern deviation
less than 5% of the normal age-corrected population will test the same or lower sensitivity as the patient for that particular point (95% will test higher sensitivity than the patient)
explain what p<5% means
peripheral points on the TD are eliminated, except the 1 nasal along the horizontal points
adjust the 7th most sensitive point to 0 deviation
explain how the pattern deviation plot is made
mean deviation
elevation/depression of overall VF compared to normal age-matched reference
affected by generalized depression & localized defect if large &/or deep
average sensitivity above normal
what does a positive MD mean?
average sensitivity below normal
what does a negative MD mean?
pattern standard deviation
degree the shape of the patient’s measured HOV departs from the normal age-matched reference
detects localized defects
generalized defects have no effect
low
____ PSD: smooth HOV
high
____ PSD: irregular HOV
T
T/F: advanced glaucoma can cause generalized depression in addition to arcuate defects
glaucoma hemifield test (GHT)
full or SITA threshold 30-2 & 24-2
pattern deviation plot
compares 5 upper & lower hemifield in NFL to detect asymmetry
probability of abnormality in pattern deviation plot
not necessarily due to glaucoma
abnormally high sensitivity
general reduction of sensitivity
outside normal limits
borderline
within normal limits
what are the 5 possible outcomes of GHT?
abnormally high sensitivity
GHT result: overall sensitivity is higher than normal
at levels <0.5% of norms
high +MD
high FP
supersedes all other messages
generally reduction of sensitivity
GHT result: overall sensitivity depressed to a degree that occurs in less than 0.5% of normal population
does not satisfy criteria for outside normal limits
may appear concurrently w/ borderline message
outside normal limits
GHT result: comparison of upper & lower zone gives a difference greater than that found in 99% of normal population or 2 corresponding zones both depressed greater than that found in 99.5% of normal individuals
borderline
GHT result: any upper zone differs from corresponding lower zone & exceeds that found in 97% of normal individuals
within normal limits
GHT result: none of the other 4 criteria are met
new defect
deepening of pre-existing defect
enlargement of pre-existing defect
increased generalized depression
what are the basic guidelines for documenting progressive VF loss?
new defect in previously normal area that is typical location for glaucoma
cluster of 3 or more points decline in 5dB or greater
single point declines 10dB or more
describe a new VF defect
cluster of points decline 10dB or more
describe “deepening of pre-existing defect”
2 points w/in central 15deg or 3 points outside of 15deg decline 10dB or greater
describe “enlargement of pre-existing defect”
decline in MD &/or greater than 3dB at all points not explained by media opacity or pupil size
describe “increased generalized depression”
overall extent of VF damage, proximity of VF damage to fixation point
what 2 criteria is the classification of glaucomatous VF defects based on?
mild defect
# total points: below 5% level
% of points on PD plot: <35
HVF 30-2: <19 points
HVF 24-2: <13 points
mild defect
# total points: below 1% level
% of points on PD plot: <15%
HVF 30-2: <11 points
HVF 24-2: <8 points
moderate defect
# total points: below 5% level
% of points on PD plot: 25-50%
HVF 30-2: 19-37
HVF 24-2: 13-26
moderate defect
# total points: below 1% level
% of points on PD plot: 15-30%
HVF 30-2: 11-23 points
HVF 24-2: 8-16 points
severe defect
# total points: below 5% level
% of points on PD plot: >50%
HVF 30-2: >37 points
HVF 24-2: >26 points
severe defect
# total points: below 1% level
% of points on PD plot: >30%
HVF 30-2: >23 points
HVF 24-2: >16 points
MD < -5dB
no points w/ sensitivity <20dB in central 5deg
<25% of points below 5% level or <15% of points below 1% level
what are the criteria for a mild defect?
mild defect
damage neither extensive nor near fixation
moderate defect
damage may be significant but no profound central damage & no significant central damage in both hemifields
MD -5 to -10dB
only 1 hemifield w/ points 10-20dB in central 5deg
25-50% below 5% level or 15-30% below 1% level
what are the criteria for a moderate defect?
MD > -10dB
any point <10dB or points <20dB in both hemifields in central 5deg
>50% of points below 5% level or >30% of points below 1% level
what are the criteria for a severe defect?
mild or early stage glaucoma
what stage of glaucoma is present if there is no VF defect?
moderate stage glaucoma
what stage of glaucoma is present if there are glaucomatous VF abnormalities in 1 hemifield & not w/in 5deg of fixation?
severe stage glaucoma
what stage of glaucoma is present if there are glaucomatous VF defects in both hemifields, &/or loss w/in 5deg of fixation in at least 1 hemifield?
variability in pt test taking
multiple exams required to detect change
many schools of through on how much change confirms change
estimating rate of progression is challenging
what are some issues facing VF progression analysis?
minimum of 3 tests required (2 baseline & 1 f/u)
each f/u compared to average thresholds of 2 baseline exams
additional f/u compared both to baseline & to 2 most recent f/us
what are the criteria for identifying VF progression?
possible progression
GPA: 3 or more points show deterioration in at least 2 consecutive tests
likely progression
GPA: 3 or more points show deterioration in at least 3 consecutive tests
possible progression
likely progression
no progression detected
what are the 3 results for GPA?
visual field index
GPA summary report
summary of measurement of pt’s VF status, expressed as % of normal age-adjusted VF
weights central vision & removes effect of generalized cataract
VFI rate of progression analysis
GPA summary report
trend analysis of pt’s overall VF history
current VF summary
GPA summary report
report of current VF including VFI, glaucoma change probability map, & GPA alert
VFI plot
GPA summary report
linear regression analysis of VFI values & 3 to 5 yr projection
minimum of 5 exams over 3 or more years is required
slope may be positive due to statistical uncertainty or learning effect
VFI bar
GPA summary report
graphical depiction of pt’s remaining useful vision at the current VFI value along w/ a 3 to 5 yr projection of the VFI regression line if the current trend continues