1/90
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Evidence people care about inequality
Dictator Game
Public Goods Game
MRI (2010)
Possible reasons
signalling to others we are prosocial
reciprocity preference
fear that inequality leads to bad social consequences
Probably evolutionary process → human survival
Inequality
Occurs when there’s a difference between groups of individuals on one or more dimensions (height, income, food)
inequality ≠ inequity
inequity when inequality is deemend inequitable (unfair, unjust)
inequity → inequality
inequality is necessary, but not sufficient for inequity
ex. grades in class
relative view
inequality is about proportional differences between incomes
T10/B50
Implications: global inequality decreased in the world since 1980’s because income ratios between rich and poor have fallen, even though everyone got richer
absolute view
inequality is about absolute income gaps
T10-B50
Implications: global inequality has increased over the past 40 years, because the absolute income gap has grown
3 measures of inequality
Income share ratios
Income gap
Gini coefficient derived from the Lorenz Curve
Lorenz Curve
plots the share of total income held by the poorest percent of the population
the lower the curve, the more unequal distribution
45* = perfect equality
Limited/incomplete view from focusing only on income inequality
people find inequalities from circumstances UNFAIR, and from ambition FAIR
Income is only one dimension of inequality
Wealth
wealth > income
Health
Education
Life chances
Opportunities
Access to public goods and services
GDP =
market value of the output of final goods and services in the economy in a given period
GDP as informative
high GPD = high production, correlation with other measures of wellbeing
GDP as incomplete
inequality + natural resources + free time + household activities
Malthusian theory
low living standards → technology improves → avg. output per farmer improves → population rises → less land per farmer → avg. output per farmer falls → larger population but living standards come back to the original level
Malthus stance
improvements in technology will not raise living standards in long term
Economic system
way of organizing the production and distribution of goods and services in an entire economy
Capitalism
PRIVATE PROPERTY | MARKETS | FIRMS
Private property
you can… enjoy however you choose, exclude others, dispose by selling or gifting
Markets
way of connecting the people for exchanging/transferring of goods and services
Firms
way of organizing production one or more people owning a set of capital goods that are used in production. Firms pay wages, they sell their goods in an intention of making a profit
Capitalism accelerates technological progress
competition, adoption, development
Capitalism accelerates specialization
allows production on large scale, more productivity
Capitalism accelerates flexibility
firms can be born, expand, die
Capitalism & industrial revolution
Capitalism emerged at the same time, or just before the industrial revolution
Rational individual
Has to make a tradeoff between free time and consumption. Makes decisions under scarcity and to maximalise their utility.
individuals make choices to maximize their utility given constraints such as income, time, and prices. This is a simplifying assumption that allows us to build models and analyze behavior under scarcity
Budget constraint
all combinations of goods and services that can be acquired using the entire budget
Indifference curves
all combinations of goods and services that provide a given utility to the individual
Optimal choice
combination of free time and consumption which gives the highest utility within the feasible set (all combinations of goods and services that can be acquired using the all or part of the budget)
Income effect
MORE FREE TIME CHOSEN change in income → expansion of feasible set you are richer, you can consume more
Substitution effect
LESS FREE TIME CHOSEN change in price → change in opportunity cost you consume more, you have less free time as OC is higher
Decrease in working hours in 20th cenury
share of income by the rich → increase
lavish consumption of the rich → higher bar of standard for anyone else
people higher value on the goods their wages can buy to fit in
conspicuous consumption
working more to afford more expensive goods
Empirical test: avg. annual working hours vs. % share of money of the top 1%
Conspicious consumption
Social status, Velben effect, working more as you the rich is getting richer and you want to be like rich so you are more likely to pay more for services and goods
Gender pay gap
unpaid work
constraints from unpaid work
allocation of better paid man work to men
culture expectations
Social dilemmas
actions taken by individuals in the pursuit of their own benefis leave everyone worse off comparing to if everybody would cooperate
Private solutions to social dilemmas
Altruism → social preference in which individual’s utility is increased by benefits to others. Inequality aversion meaning preference for fairness.
Repeated interactions → individuals cooperating now to incentivise other’s behaviour tomorrow. Repeated prisoners dilemma = 50% more cooperation probability from players
Social norms → shared understanding of a community about how people should behave. Trust and reciprocity > social exclusion, disapproval. Eleanor Ostern → rules and social norms impacting sustainable use and maintenance of common property resources
Governmental solutions to social dilemmas
Government policies
regulation → eg. fishing quotas, pollution limits
legal constraints and standards → prohibiting harmful actions
punishment and enforcement → fines and penalties, discouraging free-riding
International agreements
eg. climate change
individual governmental actions are not enough
reaching outcomes better than the non-cooperative nash equilibriums
difficulty in realisation
Pareto criterion
test or rule for judging changes: a change is a Pareto improvement if it makes someone better off and no one worse off, thus increasing social welfare.
Pareto efficiency
no one can be made better off without making someone else worse off; it's the outcome or condition achieved when all Pareto improvements are exhausted.
an allocation that is not pareto dominated by any other allocation
there is no allocation in which at least one party is better off without making nobody worse off
accounting profit
only includes direct payments in the total cost
economic profit
includes direct payments, and the opportunity cost
economic profit > accounting profit
Numerical example of economic vs. accounting profit
giving up the job for a startup = 100k lost each year
if you don’t choose to invest = 5k each year lost
economies of scale
when the avg. cost decreases with the quantity produced
causes: technological improvements, cost advantages
firm with market power
they have a downward sloping demand
the ability to set a high price without loosing all customers to competitors
causes of market power
perception of a unique, special product by the customers
firms using marketing/advertising
technological advancements
economies of scale as it is cheaper to produce the product anyway
downward-sloping demand curve
to sell more units (one more unit), the company needs to lower the price of all units sold
elasticity of demand
measure of responsiveness of customers to a price change
demand = elastic → MR positive, increases when output increases
>1
demand = inelastic MR negative, decreases when output decreases
<1
consumer surplus
Willingness to pay - Price they actually pay
producer surplus
Price they get per each unit sold - Marginal Cost of each unit
it ignores the Fixed Costs
when FC are high, the Producer Surplus might be high, while the Profit is low
total surplus
total welfare
Maximalization of gains from trade
efficient allocation
total surplus maximized
all transactions for which WTP>MC
caveats
not take into account the fairness, monetary gains don’t mean the same for everyone
why firm with market power chooses to produce less than the quantity that maximizes gains from trade?
profit maximization doesn’t mean maximization of gains from trade
(max. gains from trade = WTP> MC)
firms want to maximize their own profit, not the total economic welfare
a firm chooses the quantity at the intersection between MR and MC
Deadweight loss
loss of total surplus because of the choice that a firm with market power is making
monopoly: loss of total surplus caused by producing less than the efficient quantity. It represents the mutually beneficial trades that do not occur because the monopolist restricts the output to keep prices above the MC
oligopolistic markets
decision of one firm impacts the other firms
small number of firms in a market
public policies towards firms with market power
competition policy
as firms with market powers are not pareto efficient and have DWL
EU at EU and national level encourages efficiency
competition authorities
the government being the monopoly
Economic theory = competitive markets are (pareto) efficient
when there is pareto efficiency (S&D cross)
gains from trade are maximized
gains from trade are measured by the surplus obtained by buyers and sellers
pareto efficiency → resources are optimally allocated
conditions for the efficiency
many buyers and sellers
buyers and sellers have no market power
market is at equilibrium
trade in the market has no external effects
even if efficient, not necessarily fair
in non-competetive markets, there is DWL because they stop production at a point where P>MC
decrease in demand causes
decrease in consumer income
negative change in consumer perception of benefits of the product
a decrease of price of a substitute good
shift to the left on the demand = price go lower
increase in supply causes
cheaper inputs
better technology
rise in the price
shift to the left of the supply
tax effect
consumers
demand to the left
producers
supply to the left
total surplus
total surplus falls, welfare is lower
there is DWL
prevent buyers and sellers to make mutually beneficial trade
effects are the same on price
enchance the wellbeing of the population
subsidy effect
consumers
demand goes right
pay more money
producers
supply goes left
recieve more money but costs more to produce due to demand going up
total welfare
increase of number of transactions → welfare losses
quantity increases beyond the efficient level.
effects are the same on quantity sold
assuming there are no + or - externalities
negative externalities
when the impact on the bystanders is adverse
negative production externalities
noise, inadequate safety measures, deforestation
the marginal cost of production doesn’t take into the account the other costs because its not the products that get affected
negative consumption externalities
heating/travelling → Co2, plastic bags → waste
markets failure
when firms don’t maximize gains from trade
market failure in presence of negative externalities
cost of producing the good for the society + direct production cost
the optimum = social cost with the demand
(new disturbed “equilibrium”)
the equilibrium = supply with the demand
solutions to market failure in presence of negative externalities
private, coesian barganing
government interventions (regulation, taxation)
positive externalities
when the impact on the bystanders is beneficial
positive production externalities
beekeeper’s bees pollinating nearby, Research & Design
positive consumption externalities examples
vaccination, education, security systems
market failure in presence of positive externalities
the social benefit is higher than the private profit
consumers don’t take into account these other benefits
the optimum = social benefits with the supply
(new disturbed “equilibrium”)
the equilibrium = supply with the demand
solutions to market failure in presence of positive externalities
subsidies → it would not create DWL
patents → firms enjoying monopoly → more profit
GDP
The monetary value of all final goods produced by an economy in a given time period
GDP measurements
Output → value added
Income → wages, profits
Expenditure → changes in inventories, gov. expenditures, intl. trade
GDP = C + I + II + G + (X-M)
C → by household on consumer goods and services
I → gov. investment in: bachinery, buildings, housing
II → firms on changes in inventories
G → gov. on goods and services
X → exports
M → imports
GDP does not include
leisure time, quality of social and physical environment, inequality, depletion of resources, household or volunteer work
Purchasing Power Parity
to compare various countries → expression in the same currency
using PPP exchange rate
PPP exchange rate
rate at which the currency of one country would have to be converted into that of another to purchase the same amount of goods and services in each country
nominal GDP
good’s prices sold in year T are multiplied by quantities sold in year T
princes and quantities in the same year
current prices
real GDP
estimate the nominal GDP
pick a base year
analysis of GDP growth across years across countries
adjusts for inflation thus the base-year
nominal GDP
actual amount of money in a given currency received by worker as a payment for work
Consumer Price Index
metric tracking the total price of shopping basket containing goods&services commonly purchased by goods
Recession
significant decline in economic activity that is spread across the economy and that lasts for more than a few months
Central Bank
manages the money supply and interests rates
Monetary Policies
how a country’s bank manages the money supply and interest rates to influence the economy
Expansionary monetary policies
have a positive effect on GDP
Tend to decrease unemployment and/or increase wages through a higher demand for labour
Policies used during economic downs or recessions
decrease in interest rates
Expansionary monetary policy example from the European Central Bank
Interest rate historically low during COVID-19
easier for people and companies to borrow money supporting spending and investment
Additionally:
Bought bonds from private banks → more funds for banks to lend to businesses and households
Bought bonds from the companies → additional source of profit
Make it easier for the banks to borrow from the ECB
Fiscal policies
How government uses spending and taxation to influence the economy
Expansionary fiscal policies
increasing government spending or decreasing taxes
Example of expansionary fiscal policy
Fiscal stimulus packages like COVID-19
increased investments in R&D, innovation, infrastructure, digitalisation, climate
+ public expenditure + investment + consumption = job creation
Additionally:
job training and upskilling
job search assistance
subsidized employment
unemployment benefits
Inflation
general increase of prices in an economy
Contractionary monetary policies
have a negative impact on the GDP
tend to increase unemployment and/or lower wages
Decrease in demand for labour
Tend to slow down the inflation
Example of contractionary monetary policies by European Central Bank
Before 09’/09’ economic crisis → strong economic growth in Europe, prices were rising
ECB increased interest rates several times between 2005-2008