There have been studies that found similar results as the study above, but the results were not directly replicated. This could (partly) be the result of difficulties with the method that was used:
* **Statistical difficulties**: the initial study contained small samples (100-200), which means low power and therefore the possibility of unstable effects. Any finding is then always surrounded by a lot of error.
* **Flexibility in analyses**: you can play around with definitions of depression and life events, cutoff scores and more. This makes for differences between studies.
\
__Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS)__ \n = a relatively new, and currently dominant, approach to genetics in which more than 1000 gene data is collected and examined for their overall contribution to certain psychiatric disorders. An important principle arose from this research: there is a relationship between the frequency and the effect of genes on psychiatric disorders → @@genetic variation that occurs a lot, has a small effect.@@
\
**Main conclusion**
It is still unclear how genetic mechanisms work exactly, but there is an increase in explained variance. Overall there are, on each chromosome, at least some genes that contribute something to mood and anxiety disorders (polygenetic effect). There is not just 1 gene for depression and also not just 1 gene that interacts with the environment (as in the study about serotonin). Many genes interact with each other and the environment, and they contribute to many disorders.