1/58
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
TRUSTEES/PRS LIABILITY
Personal representatives have same duties and liabilities as trustees and can use same protection mechanisms
REFUSAL TO ACT
Individual can refuse to take role of trustee/PR to avoid personal liability
OUSTER CLAUSE
Removes a trustee duty entirely but cannot remove all duties or trust becomes invalid; used sparingly
EXEMPTION CLAUSE
Limits/excludes trustee personal liability but duty still exists; cannot exclude liability for fraud
TRUSTEE INSURANCE
Insurance covering trustee liability for negligence (not fraud); premiums usually paid from trust fund
LEGAL ADVICE
Trustees may rely on advice but remain liable if advice is wrong
COURT DIRECTIONS
Trustees apply to court for guidance; if followed → full protection from liability
S48 AJA 1985 APPLICATION
Trustees obtain written legal opinion and court approval to rely on it; cheaper than full court directions
SURRENDER OF DISCRETION
Trustees ask court to make decision where deadlock/conflict; only for specific issue
BENEFICIARY CONSENT
Trustees protected if all beneficiaries give fully informed consent
FULLY INFORMED CONSENT
Requires all beneficiaries to be known, adult, of sound mind, and given full information
PARTIAL CONSENT
Only protects against claims from consenting beneficiaries
MISSING BENEFICIARIES RISK
Trustees liable if they distribute incorrectly and missing beneficiaries later claim
BENJAMIN ORDER
Court allows distribution based on assumption (e.g. missing beneficiary presumed dead); protects trustees
REQUIREMENT FOR BENJAMIN ORDER
Trustees must make full enquiries and show no reasonable prospect of finding beneficiary
EFFECT OF BENJAMIN ORDER
Trustees protected but beneficiary can claim against recipients
BENJAMIN ORDER
Court order allowing distribution based on assumption (usually that missing beneficiary is dead)
WHEN TO USE BENJAMIN ORDER
Where a beneficiary is known to exist but cannot be located (missing beneficiary)
BENJAMIN REQUIREMENT
Trustees must show full enquiries made and no reasonable prospect of finding beneficiary
BENJAMIN EFFECT
Trustees protected even if assumption is wrong
BENJAMIN LIMIT
Beneficiary can still claim against recipients
S27 TA 1925 NOTICE
Advertisement giving unknown beneficiaries 2 months to come forward before distribution
WHERE TO ADVERTISE
London Gazette + local newspaper + any relevant publication
EFFECT OF S27 NOTICE
Protects trustees from personal liability to unknown beneficiaries after notice period
RIGHTS OF LATE BENEFICIARIES
Cannot claim against trustees personally; may claim against recipients of property
S27 TA 1925 NOTICE
Used where trustees/PRs are unsure if all beneficiaries have been identified (unknown beneficiaries)
WHEN TO USE S27 NOTICE
Where class is conceptually certain but trustees are unsure who all beneficiaries are (e.g. “all nieces and nephews”)
S27 EFFECT
Advertise and wait 2 months → can distribute safely to known beneficiaries
S27 LIMIT
Does NOT protect against known but missing beneficiaries
S27 RESULT
Protects trustees personally but beneficiaries can claim against recipients
UNDISTRIBUTED PROPERTY
Late beneficiary can still claim any undistributed assets
RETAINED FUND
Trustees hold back part of estate to satisfy future claims by missing/unknown beneficiaries
RISK OF RETAINED FUND
Difficult to calculate shares; may lead to incorrect distribution liability
RETAINED FUND
Trustees keep part of estate to satisfy future claims
WHEN TO USE RETAINED FUND
Where beneficiaries identified but cannot all be located OR uncertainty remains
RETAINED FUND DISADVANTAGE
Ongoing admin duties and difficult to calculate correct shares
PAYMENT INTO COURT
S63 TA 1925 allows trustees to pay funds into court where beneficiaries cannot be found
EFFECT OF PAYMENT INTO COURT
Court takes control and trustees effectively discharged; last resort option
PAYMENT INTO COURT
S63 TA 1925 allows trustees to pay money into court
WHEN TO USE PAYMENT INTO COURT
Where genuine doubt as to beneficiary whereabouts and trustees want to be discharged
PAYMENT INTO COURT EFFECT
Court takes control; trustees effectively retire
PAYMENT INTO COURT LIMIT
Last resort only
MISSING BENEFICIARY INSURANCE
Trustees insure against future claims; trustees still liable but insurer pays
INDEMNITY FROM BENEFICIARIES
Recipients agree to reimburse trustees if later claims arise; risky if beneficiaries cannot pay
AFTER BREACH OF TRUST
Trustees assess liability and available protections
EXEMPTION CLAUSE CHECK
Check trust instrument for liability protection
DEFENCES
Consent, acquiescence, limitation, court directions, statutory relief
STATUTORY RELIEF
S61 TA 1925 may relieve trustee if acted honestly and reasonably
INSURANCE/INDEMNITY
Check for cover or right to recover from beneficiaries
CLAIMS AGAINST THIRD PARTIES
Trustees may sue advisers for negligent advice
CONTRIBUTION CLAIM
Trustee can seek contribution from co-trustees or third parties under Civil Liability Contribution Act 1978
MISSING BENEFICIARY INSURANCE
Insurance against future claims
WHEN TO USE INSURANCE
Where trustees want to distribute quickly but still have risk of missing/unknown beneficiaries
INSURANCE EFFECT
Trustees remain liable but insurer pays
INSURANCE BENEFIT
Cheaper than Benjamin order
INDEMNITY FROM BENEFICIARIES
Recipients agree to reimburse trustees if claims arise
WHEN TO USE INDEMNITY
Where trustees want full distribution without delay
INDEMNITY RISK
Only useful if beneficiaries can actually pay