CPW 2023 LE Academy Exam 1

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 6 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/102

Last updated 2:09 AM on 1/30/23
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

103 Terms

1
New cards
What are the 3 major components of the Criminal Justice System
Law Enforcement \\ Judicial system \\ Corrections
2
New cards
Who in the court system is supposed to be the impartial moderator?
Judge
3
New cards
What are considered to be serious crimes that could be punished by more than one year in prison?
Felony
4
New cards
______ cases are brought by the government defending a specific law
Criminal
5
New cards
Which of the amendments of the constitution protects individuals from unwarranted searches.
4th amendment
6
New cards
Which of the following sources of law are law established by government?
Statutory
7
New cards
______ are violations punishable by fine, not jail sentence
Petty Offence or Infraction
8
New cards
True or False - Effective leadership includes being a good follower
True
9
New cards
True or False - The manager focuses on systems and structure, leader focuses on people
True
10
New cards
Define "Stress"
A general response of the body to any unusual demand made upon it
11
New cards
Which of the following are NOT reactions included in the flight or fight response
Decreased heart rate
12
New cards
What is a particular demand or stressor of police trainees?

* Shift work
* Probation period
* All of the above
All of the above
13
New cards
Which of the following are long term behavioral reactions that indicate ineffective coping?
Sleep disorder
14
New cards
Modest level of stress are needed for
All of the above
15
New cards
Which of the following is not a type of stress management?
Competitive exercise
16
New cards
Verbal Communication skills attempt to prevent you from
* getting complained upon
* giving the greatest speech you’ll ever regret
* getting into physical confrontations
17
New cards
What human voice characteristic is most often responsible for police complaints?
Tone
18
New cards
What is a more effective way of saying 'calm down' to someone?
It's going to be alright, what's the matter
19
New cards
Which is not one of the 8 steps to tactical communications?
Verbal smackdown
20
New cards
True or False - You can treat people with respect, even if you do not respect them.
True
21
New cards
True or False - It is better to be aggressive rather than assertive
False
22
New cards
As ego goes up, __________ goes down
officer safety
23
New cards
What allows us to maintain a tactical edge in verbal communication
Tactical empathy
24
New cards
What are you to do the 5 times words fail?
Act
25
New cards
In the 3 laws of field contacts, what does QEE stand for?
Quickly, Efficiently, Effectively
26
New cards
What does the R in the SAFER acronym stand for?
Revise Priorities
27
New cards
The 2 most important functions of a LE officer in a civil dispute is to
Standby and make sure no laws are broken
28
New cards
Police officers who become involved in armed confrontations tend to
Revert to habits during training
29
New cards
A protective sweep is only for
officer safety
30
New cards
A person with reasonable expectation of privacy...
has authority to contest a search
31
New cards
A photo lineup...
does not require the presence of an attorney
32
New cards
Plain view seizures...
require lawful presence
33
New cards
Inventory searches...
Must follow department policy to be legal
34
New cards
Search and Seizure is covered by...
the 4th amendment
35
New cards
Consent to search...
does not require Miranda warnings
36
New cards
Closed (but not locked) containers in motor vehicles
are treated as part of the vehicle for search purposes
37
New cards
3rd degree burglary...
requires breaking into a safe/locked box/locker/etc with intent to steal.
38
New cards
Concealment of goods is...
prima facie evidence of theft
39
New cards
True or False - After giving a 3 day written notice, the police must assist the landlord in an eviction
False - Court order is required to have sheriff's office assist.
40
New cards
After the landlord files a complaint with a court, the tenant has how many days to respond?
8 days
41
New cards
In order for a landlord to seize abandoned property, he must...
send a certified letter to the tenant. The landlord must not have heard from the tenant for 30 days.
42
New cards
Danger during domestics tend to be higher when
only one officer responds, with two parties present (such as husband and wife)
43
New cards
4 characteristics of the human voice
tone, pitch, pace, modulation
44
New cards
Why do we ask for any reason or any justified reason for the contact
to get an admission of guilt
45
New cards
3 deadly arenas
* on the street
* in court
* in the media
46
New cards
What does the F in SAFER stand for
Flight
47
New cards
____ _____ is a great resource when communicating with someone speaking a different language
Language line
48
New cards
T/F: In resolving disputes, the Colorado supreme court will take evidence and bear testimony from the witness
False (supreme courts deal with appeal)
49
New cards
Which are responsibilities of the prosecutor?

a) charging suspects with a crime at any time the police wish

b) doing whatever is necessary

c) setting justice not merely connections

d) connecting evidence

e) providing evidence to the defense
c) setting justice not merely connections

e) providing evidence to the defense
50
New cards
T/F: Peace officers may make an arrest when he has reasonable suspicion to believe that a crime has been committed by he person being arrest and the officer has a warrant for the person’s arrest.
False (probable cause or a warrant is needed for an arrest)
51
New cards
T/F: All defendants charged with a felony are entitled to a preliminary hearing.
False
52
New cards
T/F: Jury verdicts must be unanimous, otherwise a mistrial is desired and the case may be tried again.
True
53
New cards
Which is true?

a) A preliminary hearing must be held within 45 days from the date of demand by the defendant.

b) A defendant is not entitled to a preliminary hearing if she/he has been indicted by a jury.

c) The burden of proof place on the preliminary hearing is “clear and convincing” evidence.

d) A defendant is entitled to a preliminary hearing if she/he has been charged with a misdemeanor offense.
b) A defendant is not entitled to a preliminary hearing if she/he has been indicted by a jury
54
New cards
If the defendant enters a plea of “not guilty” he/she must be brought to trial within ___ months unless the right has been waived by the defendant.
6
55
New cards
Theory that says when you go somewhere you leave something there and end up taking something with you when you leave.
Locard’s or exchange principle
56
New cards
____ defined as taking someone into custody based on probable cause or with a warrant
Arrest
57
New cards
Defined as the first appearance before a judge where defendant is advised of rights and presented with charges. Also, when defendant first enters a plea of guilty, not guilty, or no contest.
Arraignment
58
New cards
Defined as presenting evidence to a judge to see if there is sufficient evidence to bring the case to a trial, however, this step is not guranteed.
Preliminary hearing
59
New cards
Defined as when the grand jury states whether there is sufficient evidence to proceed to trial.
Indictment
60
New cards
Defined as the presentation of evidence to a jury to determine innocence or guilt of defendant.
Trial
61
New cards
Defined as the point at which the final outcome of a trial is determined as conviction or acquittal.
Disposition
62
New cards
Defined as the money required to be released from custody.
Bail
63
New cards
Defined as the agreement that once out of custody you will return to court.
Bond
64
New cards
What does “nolo contendere” mean?
No contest
65
New cards
Defined as the state of mind required for commission of a crime.
Mens rea
66
New cards
Defined as the physical action committed in a crime.
Actus rea
67
New cards
2 prongs of custodial interrogation

1. person must be in custody
2. person is being questioned in regards to a crime
68
New cards
3 reasons for plea bargain
* lack of evidence
* equity (fairness)
* Judicial economy (back up of cases)
69
New cards
Case regarding selective incorporation due to a lack of a search warrant which set a precedent for the exclusionary rule
Mapp v Ohio (1961)
70
New cards
Case regarding the conduction of a short term search with reasonable suspicion.
Terry v Ohio (1968)
71
New cards
Case regarding searching an area within a reasonable expectation of privacy requires a warrant.
Katz v US (1967)
72
New cards
Case regarding the inevitable discovery of evidence to stand in court despite lack of proper/legal protocol.
Nix v Williams (1984)
73
New cards
What does CREW stand for and when is it used?
Consent

Recognized Exceptions

Warrant

\
3 times when a search can be conducted
74
New cards
T/F: There must be probable cause to demand identification.
False - You can demand identification with only reasonable suspicion (must be able to articulate)
75
New cards
5 levels of culpable mental state

1. intentionally
2. knowingly
3. recklessly
4. criminal negligence
5. strict liability
76
New cards
Defined as aiding, abetting, advising, or encouraging another person in the planning or committing or a crime.
Complicity (not a crime, but a theory under which you prove a crime)
77
New cards
When are you exempt from being complicit in a crime?
When you give timely warning to law enforcement or intended victim
78
New cards
What is inchoate?
An unfinished crime (attempt, solicit, conspiracy)
79
New cards
Case regarding the inherent mobility of an automobile allowing the warrantless search of automobiles.
Carroll v US (1925)
80
New cards
When can you search the passenger compartment AND trunk of an automobile without a warrant?
Automobile exception (inherent mobility)
81
New cards
When can you search ONLY the passenger compartment of an automobile WITHOUT a warrant?
Search incident to arrest

Protective sweep for weapons
82
New cards
Case regarding the ability for officer’s to search for weapons within reaching distance prior to arrest.
Arizona v Gant (2009)
83
New cards
When can you lawfully search a person?

1. incident to arrest
2. prior to transportation


1. with probable cause (except exigency)
84
New cards
3 exceptions to search warrant requirements

1. plain view
2. exigent circumstances
3. consent (verify ownership)
85
New cards
3 exceptions of admissibility of illegally obtained evidence

1. good faith mistake
2. independent source
3. inevitable discovery
86
New cards
Case that established the public safety exception to Miranda rights.
New York v Quarles (1984)
87
New cards
3 methods of suspect identification

1. photo line up
2. live line up
3. show up
88
New cards
Downs v US (1974)
Case where a plane hijacking went wrong due to negligence in FBI intervention. Required law enforcement to have a plan of apprehension, NOT a plan of attack.
89
New cards
Graham v Connor (1989)
Case where police used excessive force and required there to be an objective reasonableness standard when using force in the case of a diabetic individual rushing in and out of gas stations in search of juice. Established that the “reasonableness” of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, rather than with the 20/20 vision of hindsight. Overturned previous use of force standard that it must not shock the conscience.
90
New cards
Gant v Arizona (2009)
Case where once secured in the back of a police vehicle, the personal vehicle of the suspect was searched and drugs were found and he was charged. This set a precedent for searching the passenger compartment of a vehicle only in interest of officer safety or interest in preserving evidence.
91
New cards
Pennsylvania v Mimms (1977)
Case in which a suspended license plate resulted in the pat down and removal of a concealed weapon on the suspect due to concern for officer safety.
92
New cards
Johnson v Glick (1973)
Case in which an officer assaulted someone while they were detained and waited to administer aid to the individual. At the time, case law said "it must not shock the conscience of the court", but it was later overturned because our reasonable use of force shouldn't be judged with 20/20 hindsight.
93
New cards
Chew v Gates (1990)
Case where individual claimed their constitutional rights were violated with use of excessive force when a police dog injured them during the arrest. However, use of a police dog to search for, find, and seize Chew was objectively reasonable and not considered excessive force.
94
New cards
Scott v Harris (2006)
Case in which a police car chase resulted in a the respondent becoming quadriplegic. It was concluded the use of a car was considered deadly force, but it was justified because the officer attempted to terminate a dangerous high-speed car chase that threatened the live of innocent bystanders and ultimately did NOT violate the 4th amendment.
95
New cards
Tennessee v Garner (1985)
Case in which police used deadly force against a suspected felon fleeing arrest, but it was found that the circumstances under which law enforcement may use deadly force to arrest a suspect is severely restricted based on risk assessment of public safety and severity of the crime they are allegedly involved in.
96
New cards
Smith v Freland (1992)
Case where an officer shot and killed an individual driving. Established the need to look at the totality of the circumstance when using deadly use of force.
97
New cards
Miranda v Arizona (1966)
Case where a man confessed to a crime, but the confession was not upheld because he was not given his Miranda warnings prior to the interrogation and confession.
98
New cards
1st Amendment
Amendment that prohibits the government from interfering with freedom of religion, speech, assembly, press, or petition
99
New cards
4th Amendment
Amendment giving the right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures
100
New cards
5th Amendment
Amendment that states no person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury. It allows due process at the federal level and prevents double jeopardy.