Robert J. Art, “The United States, the Balance of Power, and World War II: Was Spykman Right?”

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/28

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

29 Terms

1
New cards

By entering WW2

US prevented the gravest geopolitical threats to its security; rise of German and Japanese Hegemonies in Eurasia

2
New cards

WW2

posed the greatest security threat of the six major wars

3
New cards

Art analyzes Spykman’s argument

If Germany and Japan had won WW2, the US would have been defeated eventually - helps us better understand power theory

4
New cards

Spykman’s four main arguments

  1. Germany and Japan could not swiftly defeat the US due to its military and economic strength

  2. instead they would first strangle the US economy via a global blockade and embargo

  3. once the blockade weakened the US, they could deliver a decisive military blow

  4. to avoid this, the US had to fight immeditaely while it still had powerful allies- otherwise, it would be isolated and eventually defeated

5
New cards

military conquest of the US

was impossible without economic strangulation

6
New cards

US defensive strengths

  • naval and air power were the great equalizers

  • 2 reasons why the blockage would’ve been devastating

    • the US could not break a global embargo

    • the US could not replace its lost raw materials from sources in the Western Hemisphere

7
New cards

1942 German Empire

serves as a benchmark for assessing vulnerabiltiies

8
New cards

Battle of the Atlantic

secured naval command of the English Channel

9
New cards

strategic bombing of Germany

secured air superiority over Western Eurasia

10
New cards

five factors offset the Eurasian Hegemons’ productive superiority

  1. productive capacity alone was insufficient to win

  2. the Allies combined productivity with strategic advantages

  3. the hegemons’ economic strength did not easily translate into military projection

  4. the US significantly close the productive gap

  5. US defensive advantages compensated the the hegemons’ superior productivity

11
New cards

Spykman argued

that the US lacked sufficient reserves of 11 strategic raw materials

12
New cards

11 strategic raw materials

aluminium, antimony, chrome, manganese, mica, nickel, quartz crystal, quicksilver, tin, tungsten, rubber

13
New cards

chrome was critical for

steel, armor plating, and munitions

14
New cards

1937 wartime needs

800k tons per year of chrome

15
New cards

Art challenges Spykman’s claim

  • underestimated US access to essential materials

  • US had alternative sources for strategic raw materials

16
New cards

counterarguments to Spykman

  1. counterfactuals cannot be proved or disproved

  2. alternative military threats

  3. economic scale and innovation

  4. sustainability of the quarter sphere

  5. political cohesion of the quarter sphere

  6. american political psychology

17
New cards

alternative military threats

even without strangulation, Germany and Japan could have found other ways to threaten the US

18
New cards

economic scale and innovation

larger economies do not always innovate faster- scale does not guarantee technological superiority

19
New cards

sustainability of the quarter sphere

the US might have struggled to sustain its defensive economy given massive raw material consumption

20
New cards

political cohesion of the quarter sphere

the US would have needed strong internal unity to withstand prolonged conflict

21
New cards

american political psychology

the American public might not have tolerated the sacrifices needed for long-term isolation

22
New cards

If German and Japan developed their own nukes

  • the US could have avoided direct attacks on their homelands

  • instead, it would target naval fleets and overseas bomber bases

23
New cards

ICBM development

  • germany had a early lead in rocket technology

  • the US began serious ICBM work in the early 1950s, deploying operationally by the end of the decade

24
New cards

Art’s takeaways

  1. US did not absolutely need to enter WW2 for its security

  2. the Cold War would that emerged WW2 was more secure for. the US than an isolated quarter sphere

  3. beyond security, there were strong geopolitical and moral reasons to enter the war

25
New cards

ultimately Spykman was

right; the US needed to enter WW2, even if his economic strangulation argument was flawed

26
New cards

power relations

dominate international politics

27
New cards

projection of US military power

influences global political and economic outcomes; that in turn shape US domestic affairs

28
New cards

US needed to enter WW2

but strangulation was not inevitable

29
New cards

US had more

resources than Spykman believed