Philosophy: Epistemology
study on knowledge; ideals with the nature of human world/consciousness -> gain knowledge about the truth
3 Questions
What is knowledge/wisdom/certainty? [facts, reality, opinions, and knowledge]
What is the nature of knowledge? [criteria, defining points of knowledge]
How can one know reality? [how a human mind logically gain/understand reality]
3 Philosophical Systems of Epistemology: rationalism, empiricism, critical philosophy
human intelligence is universal in all human minds
Regardless of differences
Optimistic
Human reason is a defining element of a human person
Human reason is the only means to certainty in knowledge
Human reason is not unruly
Logical way of thinking
Reason is the only way to determine what is morally right and good and what constitutes a good society
Reason is the gateway to reality
Makes us distinguish good from bad — can promote just and orderly society
supports reason as the only viable reason for the truth about life
Paris, France (1596-1650)
Elite society Father of Modern Philosophy
based on the spectrum of science
Empowers the existence of men; prove God through human reason
Europe (17th-19th century) -> origin [France and Germany]
Epistemology and Metaphysics -> center
Direct reason to the “Medieval Period” (theocentric)
Medieval Period: man is finite-> cannot gain access to the truth; everyone glorified God as absolute truth; God-centered
Descartes wants to restore faith in humanity (make humans progress)
Rise of science -> step by step discipline
Galileo exterminated from Christian society: “Can the physical world be understood mathematically without reference to God?”
studied at “La Fleche” University (Jesuit order)
One of the founders of Analytic Geometry
Mathematics (i.e. Geometry)
Intuition and Deduction
Clear and Distinct
based on faith which is blind
Glorifies fiction instead of facts
Serves as blockage/limitation to human reasoning
Prevents men about learning new things in life
ability of the mind/human reason to arrive at something that is really true/certain
Mind cannot help but accept it as true
the capacity of the mind that complements intuition
To arrange certain truths in a logical sequence/hierarchy/ chronological
Comprehensive wisdom about life
1–2–3
Mathematics is clear and distinct->test for the truth
Which is inevitably true
Main Objective: Total demolition and Reconstruction of human knowledge
clear and distinct -> free of error
Independent
Autonomous; not dependent on anything; free from other truths to be certain
The principle is a certain thing whose existence does not (...)
Existence
About something which is real/reality
rework knowledge of the past [inadequate]
Restructure based on own foundations and principles
System-builders
Mind-based
Best Philosophy - rigidly structured/uniformed at arriving at the truth
Philosophy-Mathematics -> complementary at arriving at the truth
Doubt
unsure about life
Uncertainty
Descartes reworked concept of skepticism
Sophists - early skeptics
attitude that questions the reliability of the knowledge
methodical
Doubt as prerequisite at arriving at the truth
Doubting is the beginning of wisdom
Senses/Sense Perception - deceiving; can be misleading “Plato’s Allegory of the Cave”; Father->God — chauvinistic society
Material Bodies -> physical things; based on sense perception
Natural Sciences - scientific disciplines study of nature/world; Chemistry, Physics; based upon sense perception
related/unified with each other
Objective - Descartes wants to doubt personal sentiments
Tries to falsify Mathematics [true and certain for Descartes]
truths of human reasons -> should be falsified
Appears to be true
Should not be based on finite minds
Hypothetical malevolent Demon Argument -> constantly deceiving us
Falsify existence of God [all powerful and can deceive us]
Substitutes God as Demon (nullify truths) HYPOTHETICAL = uncertainty
“Even if I am deceived in all my beliefs, I must exist in order to be deceived.”
I think, therefore, I am/Cogito ergo sum
act of doubting/thinking confirms self to be real
Traditional knowledge is inadequate. It should be falsified.
destroy knowledge inadequate of the past
Once falsified, knowledge must be reconstructed according to principles known by “Reason”.
recreate knowledge based on REASON-> best way to arrive at certain knowledge in life
Descartes was a “system builder of knowledge”
*abandon old knowledge and reconstruct based on a better foundations (Reason) *Thinking = affirming and negating Doubting=thinking
Latin
Act of thinking = I/self = mind/mental entity
Cannot be body = sense perception
Foundational principle
What truly exists is the mind/self
Existence of self/real
*Clear and distinct - the more you doubt, the more you affirm it
*Independent - universally true in all human minds
*Existence - must pertain to the existence of self/mind
“I” (mind/cogito) - thinking, ideas, free will, (choice/decision), soul (spiritual soul that can exist independently in the body)
replace doubt with certainty
Prove other truths->mind and body
Must investigate features of the mind
Rebuild and reprove everything from the standpoint of Cogito
*Self - abstract/can exist out of body
I can only know with certainty = my own mind and my thoughts [mind + ideas about reality]
Viewpoint — truth=> mind and our thinking
Everything outside the mind is uncertain
Knowledge of things outside the mind — mind and/or self -> basis for reconstruction
If mind is certain, outside the mind is uncertain; mind is detached from social world/human beings/physical nature
find not your own person - own standpoint
Break away from social norms
only the self exists and the ideas -> tries to prove material bodies
Enclosed standpoint
To overcome, other things exist along with the existence of the mind
My mind with its thoughts it the only thing that exists, the only reality
self-evidently clear and distinct in the mind for it to be true
“Mathematics” X God
Prove there is a God to prove Mathematics->material world
Mathematics - universally true
Reconstruct God based on reason and logic
THEORY OF IDEAS:
idea: a concept which we are conscious of; definition of things
3 types of ideas:
Innate
Naturally born with
Mathematics, logic, God (perfect Supreme being)
Self-evident to human reason
Descartes agrees, from human reason and clear and distinct
Factitious/Fictitious
Human imagination
Futuristic world
Adventitious
Caused by sense experience/outside human mind ->sense perception
Buildings, trees
*factitious and adventitious = illusion and sense perception
Ideas have 2 kinds of realities [function/objectives]
Actual/Formal Reality
Presence of ideas in the mind/the definition of an object
Ideas not found outside the mind; all definitions are in the mind but not all are clear and distinct
Objective Reality
Ideas refer to objects
Functions of ideas in reference to outside of mind
Correspondence of ideas to external objects
Natural function of ideas (hierarchical)
*”7”- what makes 7 a 7 — actual reality [concept]
idea + objects — objective reality
*For something to exist outside the mind, it should be clear and distinct
“All ideas are the effects of causes => all thing do not happen out of the blue
There must be as much reality in the cause as in the effect
Something cannot come from nothing
must come from certain explanation/thing which is real
What is perfect cannot proceed from the imperfect
concept of perfection must come from something perfect
Cause and Effect
nature of cause should be the same as the nature of effect
Not merely a connection
First Proof (p. 105) “Doctrine of Ideas”
God is the cause and we are the effect
CRITICISMS:
Ludwig Feuerbach
“God is a projection of the human mind”
Create “perfect being”/ false illusion to escape imperfections of the world
Perfection is manmade
Postmodernism
Criticizes modern structures/idea of humanity
Concept of perfection => social construct
Perfection makes us stagnant, limited in our lives
Assumes that the “innate idea of God is universal” but it is relative
Second Proof (p. 106)
I cannot be the cause of my own existence
Infinite regress - other selves cannot be the cause of our existence [no starting point]
God - first uncaused cause which makes Cogito exist [1st uncaused cause = matter/energy]
Process of elimination
Third Proof (p. 107)
ontological argument
Developed by Saint Anselm
Definition/idea of God as a perfect being -> prove existence -> investigate God as a perfect being
Political reasons in personal life (Galileo excommunicated)
Appease the church
Extra proof to be politically correct
If God is complete and perfect, then He must exist Proves God through the definition of God
God exists because He is conceptualized as a perfect being
To be perfect is to be complete
A perfect being must have the attribute of existence
God is the ultimate cause of the “self”
the reason we exist is because of an ultimate creator
On “human error” — misuse of “free will”
human mistakes is not based on God
Free will -> arbitrary, can mislead you from the truth
God as the basis for the ideas of Math and logical reasoning
“Can the mind be the cause of the idea of a material body?”
Idea of material bodies X mind; X free will
*God cannot be the cause of physical things - God-> all good nature-> idea must come from actual material bodies
“Clear and Distinct” and “Objective”
objective: exists independently from the human senses
Primary Qualities
Size and shapes/figures
Capacity for motion/change [motion based on human reason]
Volume and space/spatial extension
*thorough understanding of math/geometry, you will have a thorough understanding of the world.
Theory on Mechanism (pp. 117-118) -> scientific view of the universe
Clockwork Universe
infinite extension
Constant motion
Physical World: works like a clock, determined
Animals: matter in motion; operate on instinct than free will
*Conscience, human reason, and free will sets humans apart from animals
study on knowledge; ideals with the nature of human world/consciousness -> gain knowledge about the truth
3 Questions
What is knowledge/wisdom/certainty? [facts, reality, opinions, and knowledge]
What is the nature of knowledge? [criteria, defining points of knowledge]
How can one know reality? [how a human mind logically gain/understand reality]
3 Philosophical Systems of Epistemology: rationalism, empiricism, critical philosophy
human intelligence is universal in all human minds
Regardless of differences
Optimistic
Human reason is a defining element of a human person
Human reason is the only means to certainty in knowledge
Human reason is not unruly
Logical way of thinking
Reason is the only way to determine what is morally right and good and what constitutes a good society
Reason is the gateway to reality
Makes us distinguish good from bad — can promote just and orderly society
supports reason as the only viable reason for the truth about life
Paris, France (1596-1650)
Elite society Father of Modern Philosophy
based on the spectrum of science
Empowers the existence of men; prove God through human reason
Europe (17th-19th century) -> origin [France and Germany]
Epistemology and Metaphysics -> center
Direct reason to the “Medieval Period” (theocentric)
Medieval Period: man is finite-> cannot gain access to the truth; everyone glorified God as absolute truth; God-centered
Descartes wants to restore faith in humanity (make humans progress)
Rise of science -> step by step discipline
Galileo exterminated from Christian society: “Can the physical world be understood mathematically without reference to God?”
studied at “La Fleche” University (Jesuit order)
One of the founders of Analytic Geometry
Mathematics (i.e. Geometry)
Intuition and Deduction
Clear and Distinct
based on faith which is blind
Glorifies fiction instead of facts
Serves as blockage/limitation to human reasoning
Prevents men about learning new things in life
ability of the mind/human reason to arrive at something that is really true/certain
Mind cannot help but accept it as true
the capacity of the mind that complements intuition
To arrange certain truths in a logical sequence/hierarchy/ chronological
Comprehensive wisdom about life
1–2–3
Mathematics is clear and distinct->test for the truth
Which is inevitably true
Main Objective: Total demolition and Reconstruction of human knowledge
clear and distinct -> free of error
Independent
Autonomous; not dependent on anything; free from other truths to be certain
The principle is a certain thing whose existence does not (...)
Existence
About something which is real/reality
rework knowledge of the past [inadequate]
Restructure based on own foundations and principles
System-builders
Mind-based
Best Philosophy - rigidly structured/uniformed at arriving at the truth
Philosophy-Mathematics -> complementary at arriving at the truth
Doubt
unsure about life
Uncertainty
Descartes reworked concept of skepticism
Sophists - early skeptics
attitude that questions the reliability of the knowledge
methodical
Doubt as prerequisite at arriving at the truth
Doubting is the beginning of wisdom
Senses/Sense Perception - deceiving; can be misleading “Plato’s Allegory of the Cave”; Father->God — chauvinistic society
Material Bodies -> physical things; based on sense perception
Natural Sciences - scientific disciplines study of nature/world; Chemistry, Physics; based upon sense perception
related/unified with each other
Objective - Descartes wants to doubt personal sentiments
Tries to falsify Mathematics [true and certain for Descartes]
truths of human reasons -> should be falsified
Appears to be true
Should not be based on finite minds
Hypothetical malevolent Demon Argument -> constantly deceiving us
Falsify existence of God [all powerful and can deceive us]
Substitutes God as Demon (nullify truths) HYPOTHETICAL = uncertainty
“Even if I am deceived in all my beliefs, I must exist in order to be deceived.”
I think, therefore, I am/Cogito ergo sum
act of doubting/thinking confirms self to be real
Traditional knowledge is inadequate. It should be falsified.
destroy knowledge inadequate of the past
Once falsified, knowledge must be reconstructed according to principles known by “Reason”.
recreate knowledge based on REASON-> best way to arrive at certain knowledge in life
Descartes was a “system builder of knowledge”
*abandon old knowledge and reconstruct based on a better foundations (Reason) *Thinking = affirming and negating Doubting=thinking
Latin
Act of thinking = I/self = mind/mental entity
Cannot be body = sense perception
Foundational principle
What truly exists is the mind/self
Existence of self/real
*Clear and distinct - the more you doubt, the more you affirm it
*Independent - universally true in all human minds
*Existence - must pertain to the existence of self/mind
“I” (mind/cogito) - thinking, ideas, free will, (choice/decision), soul (spiritual soul that can exist independently in the body)
replace doubt with certainty
Prove other truths->mind and body
Must investigate features of the mind
Rebuild and reprove everything from the standpoint of Cogito
*Self - abstract/can exist out of body
I can only know with certainty = my own mind and my thoughts [mind + ideas about reality]
Viewpoint — truth=> mind and our thinking
Everything outside the mind is uncertain
Knowledge of things outside the mind — mind and/or self -> basis for reconstruction
If mind is certain, outside the mind is uncertain; mind is detached from social world/human beings/physical nature
find not your own person - own standpoint
Break away from social norms
only the self exists and the ideas -> tries to prove material bodies
Enclosed standpoint
To overcome, other things exist along with the existence of the mind
My mind with its thoughts it the only thing that exists, the only reality
self-evidently clear and distinct in the mind for it to be true
“Mathematics” X God
Prove there is a God to prove Mathematics->material world
Mathematics - universally true
Reconstruct God based on reason and logic
THEORY OF IDEAS:
idea: a concept which we are conscious of; definition of things
3 types of ideas:
Innate
Naturally born with
Mathematics, logic, God (perfect Supreme being)
Self-evident to human reason
Descartes agrees, from human reason and clear and distinct
Factitious/Fictitious
Human imagination
Futuristic world
Adventitious
Caused by sense experience/outside human mind ->sense perception
Buildings, trees
*factitious and adventitious = illusion and sense perception
Ideas have 2 kinds of realities [function/objectives]
Actual/Formal Reality
Presence of ideas in the mind/the definition of an object
Ideas not found outside the mind; all definitions are in the mind but not all are clear and distinct
Objective Reality
Ideas refer to objects
Functions of ideas in reference to outside of mind
Correspondence of ideas to external objects
Natural function of ideas (hierarchical)
*”7”- what makes 7 a 7 — actual reality [concept]
idea + objects — objective reality
*For something to exist outside the mind, it should be clear and distinct
“All ideas are the effects of causes => all thing do not happen out of the blue
There must be as much reality in the cause as in the effect
Something cannot come from nothing
must come from certain explanation/thing which is real
What is perfect cannot proceed from the imperfect
concept of perfection must come from something perfect
Cause and Effect
nature of cause should be the same as the nature of effect
Not merely a connection
First Proof (p. 105) “Doctrine of Ideas”
God is the cause and we are the effect
CRITICISMS:
Ludwig Feuerbach
“God is a projection of the human mind”
Create “perfect being”/ false illusion to escape imperfections of the world
Perfection is manmade
Postmodernism
Criticizes modern structures/idea of humanity
Concept of perfection => social construct
Perfection makes us stagnant, limited in our lives
Assumes that the “innate idea of God is universal” but it is relative
Second Proof (p. 106)
I cannot be the cause of my own existence
Infinite regress - other selves cannot be the cause of our existence [no starting point]
God - first uncaused cause which makes Cogito exist [1st uncaused cause = matter/energy]
Process of elimination
Third Proof (p. 107)
ontological argument
Developed by Saint Anselm
Definition/idea of God as a perfect being -> prove existence -> investigate God as a perfect being
Political reasons in personal life (Galileo excommunicated)
Appease the church
Extra proof to be politically correct
If God is complete and perfect, then He must exist Proves God through the definition of God
God exists because He is conceptualized as a perfect being
To be perfect is to be complete
A perfect being must have the attribute of existence
God is the ultimate cause of the “self”
the reason we exist is because of an ultimate creator
On “human error” — misuse of “free will”
human mistakes is not based on God
Free will -> arbitrary, can mislead you from the truth
God as the basis for the ideas of Math and logical reasoning
“Can the mind be the cause of the idea of a material body?”
Idea of material bodies X mind; X free will
*God cannot be the cause of physical things - God-> all good nature-> idea must come from actual material bodies
“Clear and Distinct” and “Objective”
objective: exists independently from the human senses
Primary Qualities
Size and shapes/figures
Capacity for motion/change [motion based on human reason]
Volume and space/spatial extension
*thorough understanding of math/geometry, you will have a thorough understanding of the world.
Theory on Mechanism (pp. 117-118) -> scientific view of the universe
Clockwork Universe
infinite extension
Constant motion
Physical World: works like a clock, determined
Animals: matter in motion; operate on instinct than free will
*Conscience, human reason, and free will sets humans apart from animals