1/24
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
how many participants in Milgram’s study?
40
what did the psychiatrists, college students and colleagues predict for how long the participants would go before refusing to continue?
predicted that very few would go beyond 150V and only 1 in 1000 would administer the full 450V
How many continued to the maximum shock level?
26/40 participants continued 65%
How many participants went to 300V?
All participants
How many stopped after 300V?
only 5 (12.5%)
What qualitative data did Milgram collect?
observations that showed signs of extreme tension e.g. sweat, tremble, stutter, bite their lips, groan and dig their fingernails into their hands. 3 had full blown uncontrollable seizures
Variations for Milgrams’s study
touch proximity variation
different location variation
experimenter-absent variation
teacher’s discretion variation
proximity variation
two peer rebel variation
Changes in touch proximity variation
teacher was required to force the learner’s hand onto the shock plate
Teacher’s discretion variation
the level of shock delivered to the learner was left to the participants discretion
Different location variation
the experimenter was conducted in a run-down office block in the town centre, rather than the prestigious Yale University lab
Proximity variation
The teacher and learner were seated in the same room. As a result, the teacher was able to see the reactions of the learner
Experimenter-absent variation
After giving instructions the experimenter left the room and gave subsequent orders over the telephone
Two peer rebel variations
three participants (two confederates and one real participant) shared the task of teaching the learner. At a certain point in the experiment the two bogus teachers refused to carry on
What did the variations do to conformity
Reduced them
Points for Evaluation for Milgram’s study
Research support
Alternative interpretation of findings
Research support- role of uniform situational variables
Cross-cultural replication
Puppy study shows support for original findings
Socially sensitive
Social Hierarchies
Societies are structured in a hierarchical way- people in higher positions in the hierarchy have authority over those below them in the hierarchy. This authority is legitimate because it is agreed by society —> allows society to function effectively
Legitimacy of Authority
An individual’s authority is justified by the position they hold in the social hierarchy, i.e. someone above you in the hierarchy has legitimate authority over you; you have legitimate authority over those below them
Agentic state
A mental state where we feel no responsibility for our actions- we believe we are the agents of the authority figure. frees people from demands not their conscience, they obey destructive authority
Autonomous State
In autonomous state we are free to behave as we choose, according to out own principles- we feel responsible for our own actions
Agentic shift
Cognitive shift from autonomous to agentic state. occurs when we’re given an order to someone higher in social hierarchy i.e. someone with legitimate authority
Binding factors
Aspects of social situations that make disobedience difficult or aspects that allow one to minimise the damaging effect of their behaviour i.e. factors which keep people in the agentic state
Dispositional explanation
Suggest obedient behaviour is due to internal traits such as personality, rather than situational/ external factors
Authoritarian personality
Personality type defined by Adorno as being especially susceptible to obeying authority. Submissive to authority and dismissive of those of lower status
Psychodynamic explanation of authoritarian personality
Harsh parenting
strict/ rigid discipline
expectation of absolute loyalty
impossible high standards
severe criticism of perceived failings
Conditional love
love is dependent on how they behave
Creates resentment and hostility in the child- cannot express this resentment to parents, repression, displacement onto inferiors- scapegoating