1/11
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
appellate jurisdiction
authority of a court to review and revise the decision of a lower court
-circuit courts of appeal
stare deisis
-“let the decision stand.”
courts should follow precedents (past decisions) when deciding similar future cases
OG jurisdiction
authority of a court to hear a case first, before any other court
-us district courts
-supreme courts have limited og jurisdiction
types of judicial opinions
majority
dissenting-minority
concurring- an opinion that agrees with the majority opinion but does not agree with the rationale behind it
dual court system
-states laws = state courts
-federal laws = federal courts
three-level system courts
94 districts of trial courts
11 Circuit Courts of Appeal
1 SCOTUS
writ of certiorari
orders a lower court to deliver its record in a case so that the higher court may review it
-How SCOTUS decides to hear a case: 4/9 Justices must vote to accept a case
congress influence courts
budget/salaries
remove appellate jurisdiction
control number of justices on Court
approval of nominations
revise statue
amendments and documents
judicial nominations
party affiliation
acceptability to Senate
judicial experience
Senatorial courtesy / Blue slip: President consults the senior senator from the President’s party in a state before nominating a federal judge for that state.
judicial activism
interpret the Constitution broadly and are willing to overturn laws or past precedents to promote justice or social change, correct injustice
-liberal, moral,
judicial restraint
judges should limit their own power, avoid overturning laws, and generally defer to elected branches (Congress, President) unless a law clearly violates the Constitution
stare decisis
judicial review
checks and balances legislative and executive to prevent abuse of power
-interprets constitution to protect rights