1/148
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Persona
a “mask” worn by an actor to portray a character
Personality
sum total of an individual's characteristics which make that person unique
Personality is an individual's unique psychological makeup
True
What are the levels of Hollander’s Personality model
psychological core
typical responses
role-related behaviour
The levels of Hollander’s Personality model are connected
True
The levels of Hollander’s Personality model are influenced by the social environment
True
What are the dimensions of Hollander’s Personality model
internal
external
What level of Hollander’s personality model is in the internal dimension
psychological core
What level of Hollander’s personality model is in the external dimension
typical responses
role-related behaviour
The internal dimensions of Hollander’s personality model is dynamic
False, constant
The external dimensions of Hollander’s personality model is constant
False, dynamic
Psychological Core dimension of Hollander’s Personality Model
core concept of self
real you
Attitudes, values, and self concept are examples of the typical responses dimension of Hollander’s Personality Model
False, psychological core
Typical Responses dimension of Hollander’s Personality Model
learned modes of adjustments
how individuals are likely to respond
how you respond to humour, anxieties, and frustrations are examples of the typical responses dimension of Hollander’s Personality Model
True
Role-Related Behaviour dimension of Hollander’s Personality Model
behaviour based on perception of a social position in which we are placed
roles like parent, student, and coach are examples of the psychological core dimension of Hollander’s Personality Model
False, role-related behaviour
Typical responses and role-related behaviours reflect your psychological core
True
Psychodynamic Theory of Personality
Personality is driven by unconscious forces in our brain
How these forces resolve is who we become
What are the main concepts of Freud’s psychodynamic theory
Id: pleasure principle (things you like/want)
Ego: reality principle (keeps Id in check)
Superego: moral principle (should/should not do - referee between id and ego)
Sheldon’s Constitutional Theory
Body type predisposes individuals toward behaviours
Who you become (personality wise) is a function of your somatotype
What are the different somatotypes and what personality traits do they have
Endomorphic (Viscerotonic): happy, outgoing, loves food
Mesomorph (Somatotonic): assertive, bold, risk-taking
Ectomorph (Cerebrotonic): studious, tense, introverted
Which personality theory is historically the strongest
Trait psychology
trait psychology
personality traits are determined by your typical responses
Trait
relatively stable characteristic that may represent a portion of one’s personality
Personality traits are innate, meaning we are born with them
True
Personality traits follow a normal distribution
True
Personality traits contribute to stability in behaviour
True
Digman’s Big Five Model of Personality Traits
Openness to experience: curiosity, prefers novelty/variety
Conscientiousness: disciplined, organized, achievement-oriented
Extraversion: tendency to be outgoing
Agreeableness: cooperative, sympathetic to others
Neuroticism: tendency to be tense, anxious
The Big Five Model is used extensively in sport and exercise settings
True
Based on the Big Five Model, increased PA in adolescents shows which trait
conscientious
Situationism
Behaviour varies as the situation does
The situation you are in will dictate what you do/how you express yourself
Actual behaviour and the environmental conditions in situations is what influence personality
Interactionism
Interaction between person (traits) and environment (situation)
Both traits and situation determine personality
Interactionism explains personality 2x as much as trait or situational theories
True
What are the two approaches to measuring personality
nomothetic
idiographic
Nomothetic
break someone down into individual attributes/disposition (traits)
Idiographic
emphasis on integration of personality (look at whole person)
What are two methods of measuring personality idiographically
life history method
interview method
Life History method of measuring personality
story about the main facts of person’s life
Interview method of measuring personality
asking a series of questions about the person
What are two methods of measuring personality nomothetically
psychological inventory method
direct observation
Psychological Inventory method of measuring personality
objective (structured) method like the SCAT
projective (unstructured) method like the TAT
Direct observation method of measuring personality
inferring disposition from observation
Objective psychological inventory is the most used method for measuring personality and has high validity
False, low validity
What are the two big questions regarding personality and sport
Description: Do different groups have different personality profiles?
Prediction: Are particular personality dimensions associated with success?
Profile of Mood States (POMS)
developed to assess moods
six discrete affective states (5 negative, 1 positive
Iceberg Profile
elite athletes scored highest in only vigour on POMS (the only positive trait)
There is little subsequent support for the iceberg profile
True
How much does mood account for performance
less than 1%
High risk athletes have increased extraversion
True
High risk athletes have increased neuroticism
False, decreased
Competitiveness
desire to engage/strive for success in sport
Elite Canadian athletes showed increased levels of competitiveness
True
Perfectionism
personality traits of unrealistically high standards, inappropriate expectation levels, and high self-criticism
Perfectionism could be due to social pressures
True
What are the two types of perfectionism
perfectionistic strivings
perfectionistic concerns
Perfectionistic Strivings
setting high performance standards, but not being upset when they are not met
Perfectionistic Concerns
setting high performance standards and being upset when they are not met
concerns over making mistakes and negative evaluation by others
Perfectionistic strivings are more task oriented
True
Perfectionistic concerns are more task oriented
False, ego oriented
Perfectionistic strivings have better sport performance
True
Perfectionistic strivings have a strong relationship with burnout
False, no relationship
Perfectionistic concerns have increased doping
True
Perfectionistic concerns have decreased burnout
False, increased
Multidimensional perfectionism
high strivings and low concerns = increased sport performance/dedication
A recent prediction is that 45% of performance could be accounted for by personality
False, early prediction
Athletic Motivation Inventory (AMI)
11 traits such as drive, aggressiveness, and determination
Based on how you score on these 11 traits, they are able to predict how successful you will be
Problems with AMI
Use of trait approach
Research findings never published
Fails to reference any other personality research
Clinical assessment without actually seeing the individual
Gives coaches psychological tools that they’re not trained to use
What are the main trait-based PA research topics
Negative affect (trait anxiety)
Self-confidence (self-efficacy)
Perfectionism
Competitiveness
Self-conscientious (SPA)
There is strong evidence for a distinct elite athlete personality
False, no strong evidence
There is little consistent evidence that personality characteristics lead to sport success
True
There is some emerging evidence that successful athletes are more agreeable, conscientious, and emotionally stable
True
What are 4 things to consider to move forward in personality research
Interactionism
Move beyond Big 5
Dark Triad
Move beyond sport performance
Cohesion
A dynamic process for a group to stick together and remain united in pursuit of its instrumental objectives or because of satisfaction of member affective needs
If a group is together they are cohesive
True
The reasons you want to be in a group are one dimensional
False, multidimensional
Four Characteristics of Cohesion
dynamic
factors that hold group together are varied/numerous
instrumental
affective reasons
How is cohesion dynamic
can change overtime and develop in different ways
How are the factors that hold groups together varied and numerous
the things about the grip that are important to you/why you ant to stay in the group change overtime and are different for each individual
Explain how cohesion is instrumental
all groups form for a reason
every group has a purpose
Affective reasons of cohesion
strong emotional ties among group members
every group has a “feel good” factor
If you’re in group for different purpose than everyone else, you probably won’t stay
True
Conceptual Model of Cohesion
Individual attractions to group
social
task
Group integration
social
task
Joining a new group is usually ATG reasons initially
True
Joining a new group is usually social reasons initially
False, social
Individual Attractions to Group of conceptual model of cohesion
personal reasons to be in group
This statement is an example of what dimension on the conceptual model of cohesion: I like that I have a role on this team
ATG task
This statement is an example of what dimension on the conceptual model of cohesion: I like that we party after every game
ATG social
This statement is an example of what dimension on the conceptual model of cohesion: we party together
GI social
This statement is an example of what dimension on the conceptual model of cohesion: we come together when things get hard
GI task
Group Integration of conceptual model of cohesion
seeing group as a collective
What are the four correlates of cohesion
environment
personal
leadership
team
Relationship between group size and cohesion
decreased group size = increased task and social cohesion
Relationship between physical proximity and cohesion
closer together = increased cohesion
Relationship between attendance and ATG-T in structured PA groups
increased ATG-T = increased attendance
Relationship between dropout behaviour and ATG-T in structured PA groups
increased ATG-T = decreased dropout behaviour
Relationship between lateness and ATG-T in structured PA groups
increased ATG-T = decreased lateness
Regular attendees of university classes had increased task cohesion
True
Members of private fitness clubs had decreased social cohesion
False, increased
ATG was more prevalent than GI in unstructured PA settings
False, GI task more