1/21
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Development psychologists
Self-esteem is for human development
Personality psychologists
Self-esteem is examined for individual differences in the trait levels
Social psychologists
Studied behaviours that promote and maintain self-esteem
High self esteem
Good, capable, worthy of respect and love
Low self esteem
useless, inept, unworthy of respect and love
Self esteem as a sociometer
Leary and colleagues argue that self esteem provides us with important information about our inclusionary status
Inclusionary status
the degree to which other people value us and want to include and accept us
the need to belong
social inclusion and acceptance is vital for survival
Self esteem as a sociometer - low self esteem
Indicates we need to change something about ourselves
state self esteem
monitors current relational context (where inclusion or exclusion is felt immediately)
trait self esteem
assess the degree to which one is the sort of person who generally will be valued by desirable groups and relationship partners
Negative effect or low state self esteem
alert possibility of social rejection/exclusion
motivate action toward social inclusion
Restoring self-esteem/belonging
More likely to conform to new group opinion even when judgement is incorrect
Trait self esteem - global or chronic level
Stable - doesn’t change
Stability of self-esteem - Trzesniewski et al.
Self-esteem stability was low during childhood, increased throughout adolescence and young adulthood and declined during midlife and old age
Predictors of trait self-esteem
experience, internal measure, anticipation of interpersonal outcomes
Orth 2018
Quality of home environment in
low self esteem impacts
depression, drug and alcohol abuse, and victimization
People who experience low self esteem
become acutely attuned to the degree to which they are being accepted to reject, and have greater need for social approval, fear negative rejection, social anxious and rejection sensitive
Anthony et al 2006
Individuals with LSE prefer social groups that guarantee acceptance
Self fulfilling prophecy - Cameron et al 2010
Observes rate individuals with LSE as less likeable, leading to the outcome that LSE individuals were trying to stop from happening