Gov Quiz Civil Liberties

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/37

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

38 Terms

1
New cards

Substantive liberties

Substantive liberties restraints limiting what the government shall have the power to do, such as restricting freedom of speech, freedom of religion, or freedom of the press. 

2
New cards

Procedural civil liberties

Procedural civil liberties restraints on how the government can act. These rights focus on the procedures and processes followed by the government or legal system when dealing with individuals. 

3
New cards

Civil liberties

Civil liberties encompass both substantive and procedural rights that protect individual freedoms and ensure justice within a legal system. These rights are essential for maintaining a free and fair society where individuals are safeguarded from government overreach and discrimination.

4
New cards

Civil rights

Civil rights that guarantee protection and equal treatment under the law, regardless of a person's race, gender, religion, or other characteristics. These rights are aimed at preventing discrimination and ensuring that all individuals have the opportunity to fully participate in society.

5
New cards

Habeas Corpus

 Habeas Corpus- a legal principle that protects individuals from unlawful detention by requiring that the government justify the imprisonment of a person before a court. It ensures that individuals have the right to challenge the legality of their detention and seek relief from improper confinement. 

6
New cards

The Prohibition of bills of attainder

The Prohibition of bills of attainder  refers to a legal principle that prohibits legislative bodies from passing laws that single out specific individuals or groups for punishment without the benefit of a judicial trial. This prohibition is designed to protect individuals from arbitrary and unjust treatment by the government.

7
New cards

The Prohibition of ex post facto laws

The Prohibition of ex post facto laws refers to the legal principle that prohibits the retroactive application of laws to penalize individuals for actions that were not considered illegal at the time they were committed.

8
New cards

The Necessity of the Bill of Rights

The Necessity of the Bill of Rights refers to the importance of having a set of fundamental rights explicitly outlined in the legal framework of a country, typically in a constitution or similar document.

9
New cards

Federalists

Federalists is a political faction in early American history who supported the ratification of the U.S. Constitution and advocated for a strong federal government. They played a key role in shaping the structure of the new nation and promoting the principles of federalism. 

10
New cards

Anti-Federalists

Anti-Federalists is a political faction in early American history who opposed the ratification of the U.S. Constitution and advocated for a weaker federal government with more power allocated to the states. They raised concerns about potential threats to individual liberties and the concentration of power in the hands of the central government.  

11
New cards

The Bill of Rights

The Bill of Rights consists of the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, which were added to protect individual liberties and limit the powers of the federal government.

12
New cards

 First Amendment

 First Amendment protects the freedoms of speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition. It ensures individuals have the right to express themselves and seek redress from the government. 

13
New cards

Second Amendment

Second Amendment ensures the right to keep and bear arms, allowing for the formation of militias and individual self-defense

14
New cards

Third Amendment

Third Amendment prohibits the forced quartering of soldiers in private homes during times of peace without the consent of the owner.

15
New cards

 Fourth Amendment

 Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, requiring warrants based on probable cause for searches and arrests.

16
New cards

 Fifth Amendment

 Fifth Amendment guarantees various rights, including the right to due process, protection against self-incrimination, and protection against double jeopardy.

17
New cards

Sixth Amendment

Sixth Amendment ensures the rights of the accused in criminal prosecutions, including the right to a speedy and public trial, the right to confront witnesses, and the right to legal counsel. 

18
New cards

Seventh Amendment

Seventh Amendment provides the right to a jury trial in civil cases involving disputes over property or money exceeding a certain value.

19
New cards

Eighth Amendment

Eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment and excessive bail or fines. 

20
New cards

Ninth Amendment

Ninth Amendment recognizes the Constitution saying some rights doesn't mean there aren't more rights for the people.

21
New cards

Tenth Amendment

Tenth Amendment limits the powers of the federal government by reserving certain powers to the states or to the people

22
New cards

National Government

National Government refers to the central authority that governs an entire nation, as opposed to state or local governments. In the context of the United States, the National Government consists of three branches: the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches, each with specific powers and responsibilities.

23
New cards

State Government

State Government refers to the governing body that operates at the state level and is responsible for overseeing and regulating affairs within individual states. State governments have specific powers and functions separate from the National Government.

24
New cards

Dual Citizenship

Dual Citizenship refers to a legal status in which an individual is recognized as a citizen of two countries concurrently, allowing them to enjoy the rights and privileges of citizenship in both nations. Here is a breakdown of the concept of Dual Citizenship

25
New cards

Barron v. Baltimore, 1833

Barron v. Baltimore, 1833- a landmark United States Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of whether the limitations on the federal government's power, specifically outlined in the Bill of Rights, applied to state governments as well.

26
New cards

Barron v. Baltimore, 1833 Context

Barron v. Baltimore, 1833 Context- John Barron was a co-owner of a profitable wharf in Baltimore, Maryland. Barron claimed that the city's construction projects had diverted water flow and sediment, severely impacting his business. He sued the city of Baltimore, seeking compensation for the damages caused by the construction projects.

27
New cards

Barron v. Baltimore, 1833- The Impact

Barron v. Baltimore, 1833- The Impact- The Barron v. Baltimore decision clarified that the Bill of Rights didn't limit state governments' actions, emphasizing the difference between federal and state powers. This ruling laid the groundwork for future legal discussions on applying constitutional rights to state actions.

28
New cards

The 14th Amendment (1868)

The 14th Amendment (1868)- Everyone is treated fairly by the government. It says states can't treat people badly and protects important rights like citizenship and fairness. It's still very important in America today.

29
New cards

Selective incorporation

Selective incorporation- A constitutional doctrine that protects American citizens from states enacting laws that could infringe upon their rights. The purpose of the policy is to protect citizens from laws and procedures developed at the state level.

30
New cards

Palko v. Connecticut (1937)


Palko v. Connecticut (1937)—Frank Palka was accused of killing two police officers. In his first trial, his confession wasn't used as evidence, and he was found guilty of a lesser charge. Prosecutors wanted a harsher punishment but Palka said this violated the Fifth Amendment.

31
New cards

The Signifiance of Palko v. Connecticut (1937)

The Signifiance of Palko v. Connecticut (1937)—The Supreme Court explained the process for determining which parts of the Bill of Rights would protect individuals against states as well as the national government. 

32
New cards

The Evolving of the Bill of Rights

The Evolving of the Bill of Rights refers to the process through which the protections and principles outlined in the Bill of Rights have been interpreted, expanded, and applied to various levels of government and individuals.

33
New cards

Original Intent- The Bill of Rights

Original Intent- The Bill of Rights— The Bill of Rights, consisting of the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, was initially intended to limit the powers of the federal government and protect individual liberties from governmental overreach.

34
New cards

Selective incorporation- The Bill of Rights

Selective incorporation- The Bill of Rights- Makes sure that most of the rights in the Bill of Rights also apply to state governments. It's done through the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment, making sure basic rights are protected at both federal and state levels.

35
New cards

Expansion of Rights- The Bill of Rights

Expansion of Rights- The Bill of Rights— Over the years, Supreme Court decisions and legal interpretations have expanded the scope of the Bill of Rights to address new challenges and societal changes. This includes areas such as freedom of speech, privacy rights, and equal protection under the law.

36
New cards

Adaptation to Modern Challenges- The Bill of Rights

 Adaptation to Modern Challenges- The Bill of Rights - The evolving nature of the Bill of Rights allows it to adapt to modern challenges and issues, such as advancements in technology, changing social norms, and emerging civil rights movements. The principles of the Bill of Rights continue to guide legal decisions and protections in contemporary society.

37
New cards

Balancing Rights and Responsibilities- The Bill of Rights

 Balancing Rights and Responsibilities- The Bill of Rights— As the Bill of Rights evolves, there is a continual balancing act between protecting individual rights and ensuring the common good. Courts must navigate complex legal and ethical considerations to uphold constitutional principles while addressing the needs of society as a whole. 

38
New cards

Ongoing Legal Interpretation

Ongoing Legal Interpretation— The evolving nature of the Bill of Rights reflects the dynamic nature of constitutional law and the ongoing dialogue between individual freedoms and government authority. Legal scholars, policymakers, and the judiciary play a vital role in shaping the interpretation and application of constitutional rights.

Explore top flashcards