1/11
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
How could Blue v Ashley [2017] be summarised?
Ashley joked about rewarding Blue with millions if share price increased - Blue took this seriously + sued, however court found there was no contract as that was not the intention behind the occasion
What is Blue v Ashley precedent for?
A case without an offer
What is an offer?
A clear expression of a willingness to be bound to specified terms
How could Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company [1893] be summarised?
CSBC advertised a smoke ball + claimed it would prevent the flu - gave set instructions for use and to demonstrate “sincerity” they placed £1,000 in a bank which Carlill claimed her £100 from
What is Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company [1893] precedent for?
Cases where intention to be bound and clear terms are present
What is Harvey v Facey [1893] precedent for?
Cases where information is requested (no offer)
What is an invitation to treat?
A statement that shows a willingness to receive offers (not an offer)
What do invitations to treat lack?
Legal status
What does the law presume about advertisements?
That they are often invitations to treat as it could be commercially unworkable if large numbers of people accept
What is a presumption?
default position in law - based upon other cases + is applied similarly
What are the responses to an offer?
What is a contract?
An offer with a properly communicated acceptance