Realistic conflict theory/ robbers' cave experiment classic study

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 2 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/14

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

15 Terms

1
New cards
Realistic Conflict Theory
theory stating that prejudice and discrimination will be increased between groups that are in conflict over a limited resource. Based on Sherif's Robber's Cave Experiment.
2
New cards
Who created Realistic Conflict Theory
Sherif (1966)
3
New cards
What year did the robber's cave experiment take place
1954
4
New cards
What was the Robber's Cave Experiment?
24 boys attended Robber's Cave summer camp, Oklahoma, for 3 weeks and competed against each other in two teams: The Eagles and the Rattlers.
5
New cards
Which data collection methods were used in the RCE
Observation, Socio-metric analysis, experiment, tape recordings
6
New cards
Describe the sample of RCE
24 well-adjusted (healthy, social, intelligent) 11-12 year old boys from middle class protestant backgrounds who were matched based on IQ and other abilities (e.g. sporting abilities). They did not know each other or about the study when they took part. They were screened beforehand to ensure they didn't have difficulties that may account for individual attitudes and behaviours.
7
New cards
The 3 stages of the RCE
In group formation, camp tournament, conflict resolution
8
New cards
In group formation stage
Stage 1. The groups were separated for the first 5-6 days and worked together to achieve common goals that required co-operation. Data was gathered via observation.
9
New cards
Camp tournament stage
Stage 2. For 4-5 days the groups participated in a camp tournament where individuals had to contribute in a competition to win points. Frustrating situations supposedly caused by the other group were also orchestrated.
10
New cards
Conflict resolution stage
Stage 3. For 6-7 days the two groups had to work together towards common goals: fixing the water tank; working to get food and sleeping gear for a joint camp-over; restarting the broken-down camp bus
11
New cards
Conclusion of RCE
Strong in-group identities formed in stage 1 and negative out-group biases in stage 2 formed very quickly. Stage 3 reduced negative out-group bias due to the removal of competition. Realistic conflict theory created that prejudice is formed via competition.
12
New cards
Strengths of RCE
High in internal validity as matched pairs design. High in ecological validity as used an actual summer camp
13
New cards
Weaknesses of RCE
Androcentric, ethnocentric, only males and only used one age group so lacks population validity. Unethical as boys weren't protected from psychological harm when they were purposefully set against each other to create discrimination. Qualitative data isn't very reliable to conclude from.
14
New cards
Strengths of Realistic Conflict Theory
Evidenced by the ecologically valid Robber's Cave experiment. Evidenced by social anthropologists Carol and Melvin Ember's observations of increases in intergroup hostility between tribal societies when competition for resources increases. Evidenced by Aronson's experiment of the jigsaw technique where the removal of competition decreased prejudice (competitive classes split into small groups and all groups had to succeed in a group task for the entire class project to succeed)
15
New cards
weaknesses of Realistic Conflict Theory
Sherif's own writings show evidence of hostility even before competition was introduced so the mere existence of other groups may cause prejudice rather than competition (like Social Identity Theory)