Chapter 6: Association and Causality

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/59

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

60 Terms

1
New cards

Evolution of what was thought to cause disease

1. Witchcraft, gods, demons 2. Environmental influences 3. Miasma 4. The Germ Theory

2
New cards

Pasteur's Test of Spontaneous Generation

1. Broth is boiled 2. Broth remains free of microorganisms 3. Curved neck is removed 4. Microorganisms grow in broth

3
New cards

Koch's Postulates

a sequence of experimental steps for directly relating a specific microbe to a specific disease

4
New cards

Epidemiology sets to discover whether-

exposure leads to outcome

5
New cards

exposure

contact with factors that usually may be linked to adverse outcomes

6
New cards

outcome

specific forms of morbidity and mortality

7
New cards

A concern of epidemiology is to assert that a causal association exists between-

an exposure factor and a disease (or other adverse health outcome)

8
New cards

linkage between or among variables

association

9
New cards

contact with factors linked to adverse health outcomes

exposure

10
New cards

a cause (exposure) is invariably followed by an effect (a health outcome)

deterministic causality

11
New cards

factor whose presence is required for the occurrence of the effect

necessary cause

12
New cards

cause that is sufficient by itself to produce the effect

sufficient cause

13
New cards

what are the four types of deterministic causalities?

Necessary and sufficient, Sufficient but not necessary, Necessary but not sufficient, Neither necessary nor sufficient

14
New cards

both x and y are always present together, and nothing but x is needed to cause y

Necessary and Sufficient

15
New cards

'an uncommon situation in epidemiology, difficult to demonstrate'; this is an example of...

Necessary and Sufficient

16
New cards

x may or may not be present when y is present, because y has other causes and can occur without x. In other words, x is one of the causes of the disease, but there are other causes.

Sufficient but not Necessary

17
New cards

x must be present when y is present, but y is not always present when x is. This formulation means that x is necessary for the causation of y, but x by itself does not cause y.

Necessary but not Sufficient

18
New cards

x may or may not be present when y is present. Under these conditions, however, if x is present with y, some additional factor must be present. Here, x is a contributory cause of y.

Neither necessary nor Sufficient

19
New cards

a group of component causes, diagrammed as a pie, one component cause is a necessary cause and the remaining component causes are not necessary. Together, make up a sufficient cause complex

Sufficient-Component Cause Model (causal pie)

20
New cards

Probability Models and Probabilistic (Stochastic) Causality

incorporates some element of randomness, probability causation describes the probability of an effect in mathematical terms, given a particular dose (level of exposure)

21
New cards

Radiation: radiation exposure and probability of carcinogenesis; this is an example of....

probability (probabilistic) models/ stochastic process

22
New cards

what is the cycle of Epidemiologic Research?

Start --> Research question --> Hypothesis --> Variables --> Operationalization --> Epidemiologic Study --> Fail to reject or reject?

23
New cards

The Hypothesis step of The Cycle of Epidemiologic Research can come after the Research Question or after a....

theory or if an epidemiologic study fails

24
New cards

hypotheses come from two methods...

method of difference and method of concomitant variation

25
New cards

what is the method of difference?

all of the factors in two or more domains are the same except for a single factor; the frequency of disease that varies across the two settings is hypothesized to result from variation in a single causative factor

26
New cards

what's an example of Method of Difference?

having a control group receive a placebo and an experimental group receive the medication

27
New cards

what is the method of concomitant variation?

a type of association in which the frequency of an outcome increases with the frequency of exposure to a factor

28
New cards

a phenomenon that naturally follows something

concomitant

29
New cards

factor is associated with outcome

hypothesis

30
New cards

what's an example of the method of concomitant variation

dose-response relationship between cigarettes smoked and mortality from lung cancer

31
New cards

operationalization

process of defining measurement procedures for the variables used in a study

32
New cards

"In a study of the association between tobacco use and lung disease, the variables might be the number of cigarettes smoked and the occurrence of asthma." this is an example of...

operationalization

33
New cards

how are variables operationalized?

by questionnaires and review of medical records

34
New cards

associations can be

noncausal (secondary) or causal

35
New cards

if an association is causal, it can be

direct or indirect

36
New cards

no association

x is unrelated to y

37
New cards

associated

x is related to y

38
New cards

noncausal

x does not cause y

39
New cards

causal

x causes y

40
New cards

what are the criteria for causality? (Bradford Hill Criteria)

strength, temporality, analogy, consistency, plausibility, coherence, specificity, biological gradient, environmental evidence

41
New cards

is the outcome unique to the exposure?

specificity

42
New cards

Does exposure precede outcome?

temporality

43
New cards

as the level of exposure increases, does the rate of the disease also increase?

biological gradient

44
New cards

is a causal association compatible with the generally known facts of the natural history and biology of the disease?

coherence

45
New cards

Do interventions that modify exposure modify the outcome?

experiment

46
New cards

has a similar causal relationship been observed with another exposure and/or disease?

analogy

47
New cards

a preponderance of diseases (particularly chronic diseases) involves more than one causal factor

multivariate causality

48
New cards

does statistical significance equal chance?

no, statistical significance asserts that an observed association is valid (meaning it is not likely to have occurred as a result of chance)

49
New cards

after all, and association can be....

coincidental

50
New cards

degree to which chance affects the conclusions that can be inferred from data

inferential statistics

51
New cards

process of evolving from observations and axioms to generalizations

inference

52
New cards

draw conclusions about a parent population from sample-based data

reason

53
New cards

how would we find obesity prevalence in a society?

pick a sample of desired group and measure obesity prevalence --> find the percentage of the sample that are obese = statistic --> use this to find the value for the population = parameter

54
New cards

a single value chosen to represent the population parameter, does not exactly equal the population parameter because of sampling error

point estimate

55
New cards

a range of values that with a certain degree of probability (p-value) contain the population parameter

confidence interval

56
New cards

statistical significance is affected by...

1. the size of the sample 2. how large an effect is observed

57
New cards

larger samples =

more likely to produce significant (meaningful) results than smaller samples

58
New cards

power is...

the ability of a study to demonstrate an association or effect if one exists

59
New cards

when the _____ __ ______ and the _______ _____ __ ______, the association may be statistically significant

effect is small and the sample size is large

60
New cards

when the _______ __ _______ and the _________ ____ __ ______, the association may not be significant merely because of the ______ sample size

effect is large and the sample size is small