exam 3 multiple choice

5.0(4)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/39

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

40 Terms

1
New cards
In ex parte milligan how many of Lincoln’s five appointees voted to **uphold** the president’s authority to try Milligan in military court in the absence of congressional authorization?
0
2
New cards
which group filed NFIB v Sebellius, the challenge to the Affordable Care Act?
A group of Republican Attorneys Generals
3
New cards
A house committee investigating the events of Jan 6 sought to obtain certain docs from former Pres Trump, Trump sued to prevent some of the docs from being releases

The SC considered his emergency motion in Trump v Thompson.

What legal issue was the SC (especially Justice Kavanaugh in his sep statement) careful to say it was **not** decidicing
whether a former president has the legal right to invoke executive privilege
4
New cards
when the SC decided US v Nixon, it responded to the requests of various groups that wanted Pres Nixon to release his White House tapes

What groups asked the courts to force Nixon to turn over the tapes?
the department of Justice Special Prosecutor

Sentate Watergate Committee
5
New cards
What did Pres Truman do after the SC ruled he lacked authority to seize the steel mills
he ordered the steel mills returned w/out any conditions
6
New cards
US v Printz
ruled in favor of local sheriffs who objected to helping the fed government w/ background checks
7
New cards
Chief Justice Warren was not a follower of
originalist theory of the constitutional interpretation
8
New cards
Chief Warren was
* recognized as an effective chief
* his political affiliation did not accurately predict his voting record as a justice
* viewed the SC as the protector of the public
9
New cards
what is true of the famous concurrence in Youngstown Steel
* the courts must closely examine presidential authority when Congress has neither approved or disapproved the president’s actions
* the president’s authority is weakest when he acts contrary to congressional approval
* that the president’s power is greatest when he acts w/ congressional approval
10
New cards
what goals did the Military Commissions Act of 2006 attempt to accomplish
* strip fed court of habeas jurisdiction over petitions filed by Guantanamo detainees
* overturn the SC interpretation of Congress’s habeas statue
11
New cards
what proposition listed below did the SC accept about executive privilege in US v Nixon
* claim of executive privilege can be overcome when the need of the parties seeking the information is greater than the Pres’s need to keep info secret
* the structure of the constitution justifies the existence of exec privilege
12
New cards
what was the first SC decision that acknowledged a constitutional basis for executive privilege?
US v Nixon
13
New cards
what SC decision first recognized that the president must comply w/ subpoena in a state court criminal proceeding
trump v vance
14
New cards
why were the convictions of Japanese Americans who resisted internment eventually overturned
Japanese Americans asked the courts to consider recently discovered docs revealing that the gov w/held relevant evidence from the SC
15
New cards
what is true about federalism
* recognized by the 10th amendment
* describes the division of power between national and state governments
* used by both political parties
* since the 1980s the SC has used the concept to limit fed power
16
New cards
what was different about the War on Terror than the Civil War or WW 2
* the War on Terror was not waged against nation states
* the War of Terror lacked clear geographical boundaries
17
New cards
what reason did the SC give for ruling against Fred Korematsu during WW2
public necessity may sometimes allow the gov to make restrictions based on race
18
New cards
what case the SC not invoke the anti commandeering doctrine
McCulloch v Maryland
19
New cards
what cases did the SC invoke the anti commandeering doctrine
NY v US

Murphy v NCAA

Printz v US
20
New cards
what reason did John Marshall give for requiring Pres Jefferson to hand over docs in a federal criminal proceeding
* presidents are not exempt from the 6th amendment guarantee that the accused are entitled to fair process
* presidents are not above the law
21
New cards
what SC decision required the Pres to establish some process for enemy combatants detained in Guantanamo Bay
Hamdi v Rusmfeld
22
New cards
what branch of the fed gov employs the most people
executive
23
New cards
James Speed (Lincoln’s AG who argued Ex Parte Milligan) and Holme Baldridge (Truman’s Steal Seizure lawyer for Judge Pines)

made similar arguments regarding executive power during time of war

what arguments did both men make
* the president is not required to follow the Bill of Rights
* The constitution gives the president broad inherent powers
24
New cards
in response to 9/11 congress passed the authorization for Use of Military Force

what did congress authorize
* the pres to use military force in response to terror attacks
* the pres to try enemy combatants in military tribunals
* the pres to use force against nations that aided in terror attacks against the US
25
New cards
in response to 9/11 congress passed the authorization for Use of Military Force

what did congress **not** authorize
enemy combatants to file writ of habeas corpus

* duh, Hamdi v Rumsfeld, Rasul v Bush, Hamdam v Rumsfeld
26
New cards
method the modern SC uses to enforce federalism based limits on congress’ power
* implicit limitations on congressional power such as anti commandeering doctrine
* implicit limitations on congressional power such as the equal sovereignty doctrine
* explicit limitations on congressional power such as the commerce clause
27
New cards
in what Civil War case did the SC rule that the PRes lacked authority to court martial a citizen when civil courts were operating
ex parte milligan
28
New cards
what SC decision did Congress seek to undo when it passed the detainee treatment act of 2005
Rasul v Bush
29
New cards
NFIB v Sebelius decision
upheld the individual mandate by construing it as a tax
30
New cards
according to the Constitution which is not a power of a pres
declare war
31
New cards
what is not a fact the justices should have consider when granting cert in NFIB v Sebelius
whether their ruling would be unpopular
32
New cards
what are facts the justices should have consider when granting cert in NFIB v Sebelius
* whether court of appeals were divided on the issue
* whether the issue raised in litigation was of significant national importance
* whether the SC had jurisdiction
33
New cards
what is the purpose of the anti commandeering doctrine
to limit federal power in areas where states traditionally exercise sovereign control
34
New cards
during WW2 many Japanese Americans were interned after General DeWitt’s military proclamation

was the military proclamation issued alone, or was it accompanied by other legal authority
no, the military proclamation was issued pursuant to an exec order and backed up by a congressional statue
35
New cards
in what case did the SC finally acknowledge that Korematsu v US was wrongly decided the day it was issued
trump v hawaii
36
New cards
in conference after oral arguments in US v Nixon what was one thing that all the justice agreed on
nixon should be forced to hand over the white house tapes
37
New cards
which former SC justice is famous for hailing states as “laboratories of democracy“
Louis brandeis
38
New cards
the divide vote (& legal reasoning) of one justice in NFIB v Sebelius decision surprised almost all SC watchers
john roberts
39
New cards
what was **not** a purpose of the White Paper the Heritage Foundation published whole the Affordable Care Act was being debated in the Senate
to rally nationwide support for the Act
40
New cards
what was the purpose of the White Paper the Heritage Foundation published whole the Affordable Care Act was being debated in the Senate
* to encourage congressman to vote against the act
* to provide legal reasons to the courts that congress lacked authority to pass the act
* to energize the conservative movement to attack the Act