Stone et al. (2010) (stereotypes, cognitive reliability, confirmation bias)

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/9

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

10 Terms

1
New cards

Aim of Stone et al. 2010

to investigate if processing info based on existing schema can influence our interpretation and memory of new info

2
New cards

General procedure of Stone et al. 2010

participants told name of male basketball player and shown photo of him before listening to a recording of a basketball game

3
New cards

What was the independent variable in Stone et al. 2010?

race of man in photo

4
New cards

What was the dependent variable in Stone et al. 2010?

perception of player's strengths

5
New cards

What were the two conditions in Stone et al. 2010?

half of participants shown photo of black athlete (1), other half white (2)

6
New cards

How did participants rank the player in the black athlete condition in the Stone et al. 2010 study?

Black athlete condition: ranked player as "significantly more athletic ability and having played a better game"

7
New cards

How did participants rank the player in the white athlete condition in the Stone et al. 2010 study?

White athlete condition: rated player as "exhibiting more basketball intelligence and hustle"

8
New cards

How could the results of the Stone et al. 2010 study be explained?

By activating a schema of race of particular athlete, the participants' interpretation of their performance was affected

9
New cards

What is a strength of the Stone et al. 2010 study?

study seems to confirm existence of a stereotype about athletes in US

10
New cards

What is a limitation of the Stone et al. 2010 study?

doesn't explain how social schema of race and sporting ability developed