1/34
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
safety policies
Most important safety feature - seatbelts
Sometimes when a policy is introduced, not everyone is on board with the idea
how can public policy impact health?
creation/regulation of public goods
regulation of natural resources
requirements & mandates to protect citizens
direct support
creation of opportunities & incentives
epi and public health
At the end of the process when it is implemented, we as epidemiologists determine whether is is working properly
After a policy is implemented we continue to monitor (over years) if the policy is working
Assessment and continuing assessment
epi and policy
At the very beginning of the policy process, we need to see if there is an issue we need to fix
We present it to the policy legislators (people making the policies)
We try to get the message out to the public
When the policy is released we see if the strategy is effective
We look at quantitative and qualitative evidence
**Sometimes public policies aren’t implemented due to political pressure
the essential services of public health
monitor health status to identify and solve community health problems
diagnose and investigate health problems and health hazards in the community
(9). evaluate effectiveness, accessibility, and quality of personal and population-based health services
policy
a plan or course of action (government) to influence and determine decisions, actions, etc.
health policy
laws, regulations, organizational practices, and funding priorities
have a substantial impact on the health and pop well-being
influence nearly every aspect of daily life
polices ≠ laws
Laws require certain behaviors
Policy development leads to the development of laws
licensing (licensing medical practitioner)
setting standards (levels of contaminants in food)
controlling risk
monitoring/surveillance
policy actors
individuals involved in policy formulation
members of the legislative, citizens, lobbyists, representatives, or advocacy
policy cycle
epidemiologist fits in at the:
Start: problem (definition/formulation/reformation)
agenda setting
policy establishment
policy implementation
policy assessment
stakeholders
individuals, organizations, and members of government who are affected by policy development
society
especially w/ legitimization - making polices legitimate, meaning to be acceptable to the norms of society
interest group
non-profit and usually voluntary org whose members have a common cause for which they seek to influence public policy, without seeking political control
business groups, trade unions, religious groups, and professional associations
agenda setting
lack of information on risks = difficult to prioritize
lack of coordination among government agencies
implementation
political and social contexts
may stimulate/impede creation & implementation of public health policies
effective campaigns to block policy initiatives
evidence-based public health
adoption of policies, laws, and programs that are supported by empirical
evidence based medicine movement (archie cochrane)
use of clinical trials for substantiating the efficacy/safety of medical practices
evidence-based policy
empirical data varies in quality
evaluation of most public health polices=quasi-experimental
cost-effectiveness (cost-benefit) analysis (CEA) = dividing the costs of an intervention by its outcomes expressed as units (deaths averted)
identifies the least costly alternatives
optimizes resources for public health programs, esp when resources are scarce
decision analysis
developing a set of possible choices
stating likely outcomes linked w/ choices (risks/benefits)
selecting alternatives that minimize health risks and maximize desirable health outcomes and other benefits
any activity has a risk
risk assessment
a process for identifying adverse consequences and their associated probability
calculates either qualitative or quantitative estimates
can include input of various data
identifies and alleviates potentially harmful situations that could injure individuals, communities, or ecosystems (environmental)
risk varies greatly; in our professional context = morbidity/mortality
dread/unknown risk
Dread risk - how much we dread the event
Unknown risk - how much do we know about the event
risk assessment process
hazard identification —> dose-response assessment —> exposure assessment —> risk characterization
what is hazard identification?
Anything that has a negative impact on our health
Chemical, biological, behavioral, physical, social, etc
hazard process
Examines evidence associating exposure to an agent with its toxicity
Results in a qualitative judgment about strength of that evidence
Using human epidemiology or laboratory animal data
Health effects may range from dramatic outcomes (mortality or cancer) to lower-level conditions (reduced immunity)
dose response
Measures quantitative relationship between the amount of exposure and the
occurrence and severity of the unwanted health effects
• Domain of toxicology, the science of poisons. In their research
• Start with test animals, draws inferences for humans
exposure assessment (process)
look at the pop that are actually exposed
Where is it occurring, how are they affected
identifies populations exposed to toxicant, describes their composition and size, and examines roots, magnitudes, freqs, durations of exposures
Quality of exposure data affects accuracy of risk assessment (it is known to be one of the weaker aspects of human risk assessment processes)
Factors in
where the exposure occurs
how much exposure occurs
how substance is absorbed by body.
company personal records
occupational health research
older records = used for retrospective cohort studies
sources of employment records could include: personal identifiers, demographic characteristics, info about potential confounding variables
personal identifiers
to permit record linkage to social security administration files and retrieval of death certificates
demographic characteristics
length of employment, and work history with the company
information about potential confounding variables
such as the employee’s medical history, smoking habits, lifestyle, and family history of disease
biomarkers
correlated with exposure to potential carcinogens and other chemicals
changes in genetic structure
risk characterization
developing est. of the number of excess unwarranted health events expected at different time intervals at each level of exposure
synthesis and summary of info about a hazard (that is iterative) to address the needs and interests of decision makers and interested/affected parties
how to successfully communicate it to the public
Present it to the public in a way that is easy to understand
Leads to decision/policy making
risk management
Actions taken to control exposure to toxic chemicals in
the environment. Examples:
Exposure
Standards requirements for premarket testing
Recalls of toxic products
Banning of very hazardous
materials
develop a policy to manage the issue
national prevention strategy
healthy & safe community environments
clinical & community preventive services
empowered people
elimination of health disparities
health in all policies
health
transport
housing
work
nutrition
water and sanitation