In 1920, nearly 50% of Americans lived in places with populations below 2,500. About a third of Americans still relied on agriculture as their primary income. Since mechanized farming had made agriculture more efficient, crop prices plummeted, creating a crisis for farmers.
COOLIDGE | HOOVER | ROOSEVELT |
---|---|---|
Vetoed the Farm Relief bill, which would have allowed the federal government to purchase excess crops in order to stabilize prices. | Signed legislation creating the Federal Farm Board, which gave the federal government a fund to purchase excess grain and cotton to stabilize prices. | Signed the Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA), which paid subsidies to farmers who agreed not to plant crops on part of their land. |
The solution is for the private sector to correct itself and produce less. Making food more expensive is not the solution to the problem. | Hoover believed that the federal government had a role to play in providing relief for the struggling agricultural sector. | FDR’s AAA, while different from Hoover’s plan in its execution, was identical in its objective. It was also more ambitious. |
Gilded Age | Progressive Era | The 1920s |
---|---|---|
1865-1900 | 1900-1920 | 1920-1929 |
Government **SUPPORT \n **for Big Business | Government **REGULATION \n **of Big Business | Government **SUPPORT \n **for Big Business |
Low Taxes and Regulations | More Taxes and Regulations | Low Taxes and Regulations |
\
causes of the stock market crash
The 1920s were a period of transition and the farm economy struggled. Economic upheavals can be a natural consequence of change.
The 1920 census was the first census that showed more Americans living in urban areas than in rural areas. By comparison, the 1790 census had 95 percent of Americans living in rural areas. Agriculture had become efficient to the point where there were more farmers than the market demanded (but real life had not caught up with these economic realities, as a farmer can’t exactly just go out and get another job).
Excessive Borrowing due to consumerism and cheap credit policies from the Federal Reserve (1922-1928)
The Federal Reserve set interest rates around 4% through most of the 1920s. Low interest rates encourage borrowing and people took advantage of these interest rates in order to buy new household appliances, automobiles, and to wire their homes for electricity. When the Federal Reserve suddenly raised interest rates in 1928, it began to put a strain on American who were already heavily in debt.
Financial Collapse (Stock Market and Banks)
With the stock market performing at record levels of growth during the 1920s, many Americans bought stocks to make short term gains. Because of low interest rates, some people bought stocks on the margin (with borrowed money). When the stock market crashed in 1929, investors who had bought stocks on the margin not only lost their own money, but also owed money to brokerage houses that had lent them the money. Then, the brokerage houses had toxic debt that they had no way to collect from ruined investors. \n In addition to the stock market collapse, banks failed across the nation, wiping out the life savings of many Americans who had funds deposited their money in the failed institutions. Bank runs became common, as crowds would rush to get their money out of a bank upon hearing even a rumor that it was failing. These bank runs only made the problem worse, causing the failure of banks that would have been able to remain solvent if depositors had not shown up en masse demanding all of their money, at once.
OVERPRODUCTION in the Late 1920s
Because of rampant consumerism in the early 1920s, factories continued to produce new products at the rates they been producing. As consumerism slowed down in the late 1920s, a lot of goods were left on the shelves. That impacts profits, which in turn impacts stock prices. Overproduction in the agricultural sector resulted in a downward spiral of crop prices.
ECONOMIC FALLOUT FROM THE FIRST WORLD WAR
The Treaty of Versailles was not exactly designed to get the global economy going. John Maynard Keynes, a British economist and father of “Keynesian” economics, attacked the treaty in his book, The Economic Consequences of the Peace (1919), in which he predicted economic fallout because of the “Carthaginian peace” that was imposed upon Germany. The United States attempted to mitigate the economic crisis with the Dawes Plan and the Young Plan, but ultimately, to no avail.
Herbert Hoover’s Policies (Did they turn a panic into the Great Depression?)
Hoover responded to the stock market crash with a number of flawed policies:
Tariff Increase - The Hawley-Smoot Tariff - the second-highest tariff in the history of the United States - intended to protect American jobs, but ended up having a devastating effect on global trade by slowing the global distribution of goods by nearly 70 percent.
[Voluntary] Wage Freeze - Hoover got business leaders together to agree to freeze wages. This had the unintended consequence of increasing unemployment.
THE ECONOMY | POLITICIANS |
---|---|
We need policies that encourage the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. | \n We need to protect jobs! |
GDP (Gross Domestic Product) | Unemployment |
potentially preferable responses on Hoover’s behalf
Give the overall economy a chance to recover (economic).
Support legislation providing temporary economic relief for the unemployed (political).
\
While not as ambitious as FDR, Hoover did take measures to use the power of government to remedy the Depression.
What did Hoover NOT do?
HOOVER | FDR |
---|---|
Both created new federal agencies designed to deal with the problems of the Great Depression.None of these federal agencies were particularly helpful in bringing about economic recovery. | |
Hoover saw direct relief as outside of the legitimate scope of government. \n This contributed to the erroneous belief (of people both then and now) that Hoover did nothing to try to remedy the Depression. | FDR believed that the federal government should be responsible for direct relief for people who were suffering. \n FDR’s reforms were much more ambitious than Hoover’s, prompting direct criticism from Hoover and other conservatives who believed that the New Deal had gone too far in redefining the American economy. |
Hoovervilles: Unemployed people constructed shanty towns they called “Hoovervilles,” blaming the president for their economic woes.
The Bonus Army debacle was a nail in Hoover’s political coffin, popularizing the idea that Hoover lacked compassion for people who were suffering.
\
\