1/19
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Problems with recorded sounds
difficult to record, repetitiveness, complex interactions
Physical simulation
elastic deformable model, direct simulation infeasible
Modal analysis
each mode represents a resonant mode of vibration, applying impulse excites modes, position of impact determines relative amplitude
1st mode frequency
f0
2nd mode frequency
f1 = 2f0
Higher modes frequencies
fk = kf0
Deformation modeling
vibration of surface generates sound, represent the vibration pattern by a bank of damped oscillators or modes, standard for real
Discretization
an input triangle mesh → a spring
Spring
mass system setup
Ordinary Differential Equation
Kd + Cd’ + Md’’ = f where K = stiffness, C = damping, M = mass
General solution for modal analysis
zi = ciewi+t + c’iewi
State detection
distinguishing between lasting and transient contacts
Lasting contacts
a sequence of impulses, vt ≠ 0
Transient contacts
a single impulse, vpnp < 0 if in contact
Impulse response
zi = ciewi+t + c’iewi
Principle of mode compression
hard to distinguish close frequencies within a specific range
Mode truncation
stop mixing mode when its contribution falls below a prescribed threshold
Quality scaling
give more importance to higher intensity foreground sounds to gracefully adapt to variable time constraints
Limitations of modal analysis
only models the surface, more approximate, can only use linear damping models