1/95
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Who are Carlists?
Conservative nationalists
Supported an absolute monarchy
Fought in several Carlist Wars
Primarily fought in Basque and Catalonia
Who were the Landowners and Latifundia?
Latifundia: Large estates owned by wealthy landowners
Kept labourers without land in poverty
As a result, economy was underdeveloped
What was Catholic Churches’ role?
Held power and prestige in society
Strong ties with the wealthy and the army
Controlled education, opposed ideals appealing to commoners
Landowners and Latifundia
Latifundia: Large estates owned by wealthy landowners
Kept labourers without land in poverty
As a result, economy was underdeveloped
Monarchy aka the Restoration
After Carlist victory, monarchy came back to power
Lots of military interventions during this time, stability had to be established
Rife with electoral fraud; liberals and conservatives rotated every election
Army had lots of power
Top ranks were filled with wealthy men
Bitter because they had lost their once-great empire
What is Anarchism?
Believed in lawlessness
Frequent strikes
Clashed with the police often
Socialism and Trade Unions
Established a political party (PSOE)
Established a trade union (UGT)
Represented the workers’ desires, went against the church’s ideals
Separasits Regions
Two major regions, defied the rule of the monarchy:
Catalonia
Northeastern Spain
Had the industry, economy to support itself
Had a different language as well (Catalan)
Major places: Barcelona
Basque
Northern Spain
Same as Catalonia
Major places: San Sebastian, Bilbao
Rif War
Colonial conflict in Morocco: Spain vs the Berber peoples (inhabited the mountains)
Started when Berbers attacked Spanish miners, Spanish army intervened
Called for conscription to bolster their forces, public dissent (Tragic Week)
Long-lasting conflict, strong resistance from the native peoples
Key event: Battle of Annual
Spanish troops had just settled Annual
3,000 Rif warriors attack an encampment of 5,000 Spaniards
Riffians brutally kill them, continues to attack nearby Spanish encampments
13,000/23,000 Spaniards dead, compared to 800/3,000 Riffians
Major influence back home in Spain
Tragic Week: The Strike at Barcelona
Workers went on strike after refusing to abide by conscription
Enacted by Madrid to field more troops to fight the Rif War
In Catalonia, UGT members and anarchists walked out on their jobs
Resulted in;
Martial law and violence
Repression
Banning trade unions and closing down newspapers
Anarcho-syndicalism
Influenced by capitalist ideas, a political doctrine that advocates replacing central government with decentralized, worker-controlled committees loosely based on a trade union model → achieved ts greatest mainstream success in the Conferderacion Nacional del Trabajo (CNT) in Spain. It emphasizes direct action and workers' self-management.
Trade Unions
Created the CNT, a trade union to rival that of the UGT following Tragic Week
Beginning of the divisions in Spain’s left-wing populace
Spain during the First World One
Remained neutral, but had an economic boom (supplied both sides of the war)
Once armistice was signed, economy collapsed, hitting Catalonia especially hard
Pre-war parliamentary system fell to ruin
Also because of strikes, failure in Morocco
Communism even took root (PCPE was formed)
In response to this and more, the army rose to solve the issue
What is the Spanish Foreign Legion
Fatherland was all that mattered, supporting the Nationalist forces led by General Franco.
Busy fighting in Morocco, younger officers began to make their worth known
When demanding promotion, senior officers and govt. declined, they ousted the Liberal govt. and a conservative one was put into power
They became known as the “juntas”
Later helped the new govt. in crushing worker revolts
Who was Francisco Franco?
One such man who made his name was General Francisco Franco
He had achieved much during the Rif War
Received praise from Miguel de Rivera
Became second-in-command of the Spanish Foreign Legion
Spent his life fighting, picked up the army’s ideologies with it
Brutally terrorize the native Moroccan population
For God, King and Country
The Spanish Army
Spent much of its time either putting down rebellion or fighting in Morocco
Millan Astray was known for his indoctrination speech when recruits joined the Foreign Legion
TL;DR: You have nothing left now but the Legion, embrace death, no cowardice
Notorious for their brutality, only got worse once Franco took control in 1923
Miguel Primo de Rivera
was a general and statesman who, as dictator of Spain from September 1923 to January 1930, founded an authoritarian and nationalistic regime that attempted to unify the nation around the motto “Country, Religion, Monarchy.”
Coup d’Etat 1923
Led by Primo de Rivera, supported by King Alfonso XIII, the church and the army
King hated the idea of a constitutional monarchy
Church wanted to control education
Army vowed to disobey constitution and parliament
Rivera declares a state of emergency, lasts two years
Results in order brought about in Spain and its colony, Morocco
What is Corporatism?
the theory and practice of organizing society into “corporations” subordinate to the state.
Corporatism: Modernizing the Economy
Business monopolies supported, allowing for businesses to flourish
Finance minister Jose Calvo Sotelo helps in the modernizing effort
People in power that supported the right prospered, like Franco
Republican Opposition
Not all were content with this shift in power
Anarchists and communists were repressed
Students launch protests in a demand for democracy
One group was the Republicans, led by Alejandro Lerroux and Manuel Azana
These two formed the Alianza Republican
Failed overthrow of king in 1929
They meet in San Sebastian (Basque country) to plot another overthrow
Great Depression instead ends up being the downfall of Primo de Rivera
Great Depression
Much like the rest of the world, Spain’s economy came crashing down
This led to economic and political instability, allowing for the unseating of Primo de Rivera
Strikes, revolt and more ensued as a result of weakened leadership
What is the Popular Front?
A political strategy of electoral cooperation between left-wing parties designed to prevent vote splitting and thus defeat right-wing parties → Popular in response to the fascist and other right-wing parties during the 1930’s
The Election of 1931
King Alfonso XIII was exiled from his throne, allowing for democratic elections to take place
People were ecstatic that democracy was finally a reality in their nation
Ended in an overwhelming Republican victory
What is the Second Republic?
The system of government that governed Spain from the abdication of Alfonso XII in 1931 until the end of the Spanish Civil War
Who were the Republicans?
Elements of the military that remained loyal and supported the government of the Second Spanish Republic against the Nationalist faction of the military and led by Prime Minister Azana
Abdicating the throne
King Alfonso XIII was advised that the only way his nation would hold itself together was with his abdication
He ended up agreeing, and was sent into exile
This effectively ended the monarchy in place, paving the way for the formation of the Second Republic
What were the social reforms?
Peasants wanted land ownership
Industrial workers wanted to protect their right to strike
Education was also something that was taken into the hands of the government
Agrarian reform and regional autonomy (Catalonia and Basque) were also top priorities
Niceto Alcalá-Zamora
President of the Second Republic, a moderate Republican
Despite this, some radical elements were in his cabinet (Azana, Caballero, Prieto)
Zamora handed prime minister to Azana, feeling that he would do a better job of unifying the radical elements present within the leftist side of politics in Spain
Manuel Azaña
Prime Minister of the Second Republic, radically leftist and anti-clerical
Pushed for strong social reforms, weakened the army
Disliked by many on the right, like Sotelo
Separation of the Church and State
With a socialist government in power and an anti-clerical Azana at its head, it had much to fear
They were threatened by a separation of the church and state, meaning that much power would be lost
Namely, control over education
Anti-church riots became the norm, while the police sat by idly and did nothing
Opposing the Republic
With reforms pushing the right to the brink, many new organizations were formed
Church-supporting CEDA stood up to oppose the anti-clerical ideals of the left
Monarchist Sotelo rose to prominence among the right, gaining much popularity and heading the Accion Espanola
A radical monarchist Carlist movement appears as well, independent of Sotelo
Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera heads the fascist Falange political party
Long-term cause of the War: Regional divisions
Spain comprised of the central state, the Basque country and Catalonia
The Basque and Catalans had their own language and culture and wanted decentralization and independence from Spain
By the 20th century, they were economically independent and had their own industrialised economies and churches
Both these countries wanted autonomy from Spain and they had the support of the republicans
Long-term cause of the War: Economic and social divisions
The cities in the north (Barcelona, Madrid, Bilbao) were highly modernized and industrialised, and also significantly richer than the cities in the south
This created a new urban proletariat and industrial elite in the nortn
In the south, the contrast was large. Many peasants worked on large estates called latifundias, that were owned by the rich landowning class.
Long-term cause of the War: Economic and social divisions; Agriculture
○ Spain’s economy was agriculturallybased; the south of Spain was mainly agricultural. Some peasants in the north owned small plots of land that were economically unviable.
○ Despite some industrialisation in the north, the economy of Spain was mainly agricultural. Yet this agricultural sector did not provide enough work and food for peasants all year round, and lead to the growing discontent amongst peasants.
Long-term cause of the War: Economic and social divisions; Working class
Workers faced low wages, long hours, unregulated working conditions, poor 64 housing, little welfare support → growth of trade unions, but the trade unions often competed with each other (e.g. UGT vs CNT) and did not have any real power because employers could always find more labour from the countryside.
No legal means to improve situation→ workers turned to violent uprising to effect change. (violent conflict between employers and employees, esp. when there were economic problems in Spain)
Long-term cause of the War: Political divisions
As a result of these regional/economic/social divisions, the nation of Spain was deeply divided.
The rich landowners/industrial elite, Army, Church and the Monarchists lent their support to the Conservatives and Fascists
The proletariat/peasants, republicans, reformers and the minorities (Basque/Catalan) lent their support to the socialists and anarchists.
Liberals
did not really achieve anything in opposing the Conservatives, but they did support the revolution that ousted the King in 1931.
Spanish Socialist Party (PSOE)
grew in urban areas, but had minimal impact
UGT (trade union)
more visible in organizing strikes and protests in urban areas
Socialists
played a significant role in the 1931 revolution, but became divided over the reforms that should take place → divided into two → the more moderate socialists (led by Indalecio Prieto) and the radicals (led by Largo Cabarello)
Anarchists
major political group— supported by peasants due to their demand for the redistribution of land. Argued for revolutionary methods, boycotted all democratic processes. (Trade union: CNT— active in organizing strikes and protests.)
Extreme Anarchists
Spanish Anarchist Federation (FAI)— perpetrated bombings and assassinations.
Long-term cause of the War: Role of the Church
The Catholic Church was rich and powerful. It bore a heavy influence over the daily lives of everyone in Spain and was deeply conservative.
Its main support base was the rich landowners and as such, it was seen as both an enemy of change and as a figure of oppression due to its support base
Thus, it was greatly resented by all the peasantry
Long-term cause of the War: Role of the Army
The Army was grossly overofficered, roughly one officer to every hundred men. Also, it was unpopular due to the losses of overseas territories (Cuba and the Philippines), and its brutality. The officer corp was dominated by the upper classes and hence it was very conservative and opposed change.
Supported by upper and middle classes (who formed most of the officer corps). Generally conservative. ‘Africanistas’ who had served in Morocco were the most traditional and nationalistic.
This Army that had nothing much to do hence adopted the role of protector of security, law and tradition. As a result of this, political tension was generated by the Army’s frequent interference in home affairs and politics. (especially because the army blamed civilian politicians for the loss of the empire, believed that they had no moral right to govern the country.
The army believed that it was the protector of the nation (wanted to defend Spain’s historic greatness⇒ against change.) ((and had the right to intervene in politics if a crisis occurred→ intervened several times before. BUT they did not act to save the King in 1931, leading to the King’s exile. They also intervened during the Second Republic and in 1936⇒ war.))
Long-term cause of the War: Government’s weekness
Constitutional Monarchy: the King (Alfonso XIII) was the head of state, appointed a prime minister who should have commanded a majority in the parliament (Cortes), which 66 was elected by the male population.
Real power lay in the hands of the oligarchs, political power shifted between them.
Two main political parties (Conservatives and Liberals), but there was no real difference between them. Elections were rigged/decided by corruption, there was no main democratic party
⇒ superficial stability but very socially unstable because nothing ever changed→ people either became apathetic or opposed to the current government
Short-term cause of the War: Political polarisation
In 1930, Primo de Rivera resigned after having failed to solve Spain’s economic problems. Municipal elections held showed a popular support for leftist political parties (republicans, liberals, socialists), hence with no one willing to support the reign of the monarchy left, King Alfonso went into voluntary exile. → His departure marked the start of the Second Spanish Republic in April 1931
The left republic (April 1931 November 1933)
Centre left party won election, new president was Manuel Azana.
New government declared a new constitution, with the intention of making spain a “democratic republic of workers of all classes”
Azana was highly antichurch and antiarmy
Undermined the power of the church and separated church and state by removing its control over education in Spain
Undermined the power of the Army by closing the Saragossa military academy and offering officers early retirement on full pay:
This was a big mistake as it effectively radicalised the army and meant that all those left in the army were nationalist and conservative to the core
Also, it was extremely expensive as 50% of the officers took up the government’s offer of retiring on full pay
Short-term cause of the War: Great Depression
Spain was hit hard by the Great Depression and its agricultural prices, wine and olive exports were plummeting.
○ Increasing number of peasants unemployed due to collapsing agricultural industry
○ Industrial production decreased too, with iron falling by a third and steel by almost a half
○ Minister of Labour, Largo Caballero, tried to stop this decline by offering a land distribution programme with compensation for landowners, but the government did not have the money necessary to do this and this benefitted less than 7000 families.
Short-term cause of the War: Civil unrest
Civil unrest continued and the government still put them down with great brutality
○ Introduction of the Assault Guard in an attempt to produce a leftleaning military force to check the balance of the rightwing army
○ However, most of the army still remained loyal to the state and uprisings were suppressed
Short-term cause of the War: Catalonia given its parliament
Catalonia given its own parliament, which upset the right as they saw this as a move towards independence for the regions and the breakup of Spain
Short-term cause of the War: The reaction to the new leftist government’s reforms
● Each of the new leftist government’s reforms was seen as an attack on rightwing groups
○ Rightwing formed a new political party in order to defend the interests of the conservative church and landowners.
○ This party came to be known as the CEDA (Spanish confederation of the autonomous right) and was led by Gil Robles
○ Important to note that CEDA under Gil Robles was modelled after Hitler’s Nazi party in Germany
Short-term cause of the War: the 1931-1933 leftwing government’s failure
Fall of the 19311933 leftwing government was largely seen as a failure to introduce effective land reforms, but historian Paul Preston argues that it was because the rightwing was never going to give the left wing government a chance to succeed.
They did not do enough to placate the left and peasants, but did enough to anger the right 68
Azana resigned in 1933 after he lost working class and socialist support
Short-term cause of the War: The Right Republic (November 1933 February 1936)
● In the November 1933 elections, the Republic swung to the right
● Despite CEDA being the largest party in the republic, the President initially resisted giving Gil Robles power, however CEDA withdrew support, forcing the government’s hand.
○ Gil Robles was made War minister and 2 other CEDA members were given cabinet posts
● The 2 years that the new Rightwing government came into power were known as the black years
○ This was because it seemed that the new rightwing government was only keen on undoing all the reforms that the leftwing government had introduced previously
○ Church control of education was restored and the Azana’s key economic reform the land programme was halted.
○ Catalonia tried to declare its independence after CEDA joined the government, but its autonomy was suspended after the Asturian miners’ uprising in 1934
○ This uprising was crushed using the army, notably, the Moroccan troops or Moors (Filthy Franco)
● Widespread use of violence made for a loss of support for the rightwing government, notably the Basques, who now lent their support to the leftwing
● Largo Caballero called for a halt to Robles and his rightwing actions, likening CEDA to the Spanish Nazi party, and that Spain should seek a more Soviet styled leftwing solution for Spain’s problems
● Gil Robles responded by demanding a shift to a more authoritarian approach to controlling the communists in Spain.
○ This led to the left and centre left groups (Caballero and Prieto) being able to find a common ground to enable them to take on the rightwing
● Right Republic disintegrated as the political and economic situation deteriorated and was dissolved in February 1936
Immediate cause of the War
Military rising July 1936:
● Victory of the left in the 1936 elections threw the rightwing CEDA into turmoil
○ The murder of José Sotelo (popular CEDA leader) hastened preparations for a military coup 1936 led by junior officers + senior Africanista officers (Franco and Mola included)
○ 17 July: Revolt began with troops in Morocco and spread to military units throughout Spain, but was met with armed resistance from leftwing unions, particularly in rural south, Barcelona, and Madrid.
■ As a result, army was only able to take control of parts of Spain, bringing the country into a civil war.
Britain and France as an intervention force and the impact
Intervention:
● France initially supported the Republic because they didn’t want the Nationalists to win (fear of encirclement by Fascists+strengthening of Germany and Italy’s relations.) but they didn’t fully commit due to domestic concerns political polarization, lack of public support for the war meant that there might be a revolt if they fully committed to Spain.
● Signed the nonintervention pact (Nonintervention committee NIC)
● Tried to get involved by not getting involved
● Scared of a European war and was an early forerunner of appeasement
● Domestic concerns → France’s political problems, lack of public support for war
● Weakens the left in Spain as they are unable to purchase arms
● Didn’t do anything about the right/nationalists purchasing arms
Impact of France’s and Britain’s intervention
Britain:
○ NonIntervention Committee (1936)
■ Three key members (those under dictatorships – Germany, Italy, USSR) ignored it completely and provided foreign forces anyway
○ Limited Republicans, tended to favourNationalists
■ Nationaists allowed to use Gibraltar as their base, compared to their complete prevention of aid going to the Republic
■ Trade agreement with Nationalists (1936) allowing British companies to trade with rebel forces
○ Selfinterest of avoiding war – sacrificed Spain to the policy of appeasement to maintain relations with Italy, Portugal, and Germany (which Chamberlain still had faith in)
France:
○ Inconsistent support ending up with it decided to pursue nonintervention together with Britain, dealing a fatal blow to the Republic
■ Support of a large country on the border would have been beneficial
■ Resulted in reliance on Soviet Union: gold reserves, also associated the Republic with ‘Soviet communism’
○ Did not stop citizens from joining International Brigades (mainly French); main centre for coordinating Soviet aid
Intervention of the Soviet Union
Intervention:
● Involved because of ideology and fear of fascism (Collective security joined LON in 1934)
○ Saw a potential communist ally in western europe Spain
● Only country that supported the left and they were the only country that the leftist republicans could purchase arms from
● needed economic resources → obtained Spanish gold reserves by making the Republicans pay for German aid profits to industrialize
● Didn’t provide the same level of troops and arms as the fascists did for the nationalists
● From 1938, commitment began to reduce → gave up on collective security and trying to make allies with Britain
Imact of Soviet Union’s intervention
○ Welcomed the NIC, but, following Italy and Germany’s example, didn’t really care about it and withdrew in October 1936
○ Dragged the war out with good purpose
■ Weaken, drain resources of Germany
■ If this developed into a general war, it would be waged far from the borders of the Soviet Union
Intervention of Germany:
● Hitler got involved as he saw Franco as a potential fascist ally → wanted to expand the reach of fascism in europe
● Wanted to test out their new military tactics
● Airlifted Franco and the moors to the mainland from morocco
● Wanted access to the iron, copper and zinc ore as an indemnity for Germany’s intervention in the war
Impact of Germany’s intervention
○ German air support helped Franco setup a beachhead in the south, where the food was grown → crucial to Franco gaining an advantage in the war (economic and strategic benefits)
■ Raw materials e.g. iron ore
■ Deployment to Spain would give Germany the potential to hamper AngloFrench maritime communications
■ Goering wanted to test out his Luftwaffe in live conditions; Hitler wanted to stop the spread of communism
○ Pivotal support important to the outcome of the war, playing crucial military roles at critical times
■ Luftwaffe also helped bomb Guernica when it was held by the Republicans → Nationalists taking Catalonia
○ Deterred other governments from getting involved due to their presence
Intervention of Italy
● Got involved because of ideological reasons
● Also wanted to isolate France, dominate the mediterranean and have access to the Spanish iron ore ● Improve Mussolini’s popularity at home win another glorious war
● Sent 75,000 men and resources but put a huge financial strain on its economy
Impact of Italy’s intervention
○ Strategic advantages
■ Involvement would reinforce his profascist stance
■ Enhance influence as key Mediterranean power, demonstrate Italy’s might
■ Fascist victory → undermine France (and therefore leftwing French influence) ○ Air and naval support helped the Nationalists to secure victory ○ Relationship between Italy and Germany was cemented in Spain
International Brigades
Made up of women and men all around the world volunteering to fight in the Spanish Civil War after the western democracies adopted non-interventionist policies which also stopped financial aid to the Republicans and made it illegal to travel to Spain but did not stop people from volunteering → the brigades were organized by national communist organizations and coordinated by the comintern
The brigades were never numerically sgnificant and suffered heavy losses due to the lack of military experience. Their presence was an important moral booster at crucial times such as during the siege of Madrid and they did buy time for the Republican Army in several key battles.
Portugal as an intervening power:
○ Fundamental to supplying the rebels along the Spanish–Portuguese border, provided a base for communications
○ Longterm AngloPortuguese relationships deterred Britain from countering its support → benefit for Franco’s troops
Reason for nationalist victory: Political disunity
○ The Second Republic suffered from serious divisions undermining its war effort and military capacity; ‘civil war within a civil war’
■ E.g. Threesided conflict between liberals, authoritarian socialists / communists, anarchists
■ Republicans were disunified, trade unions vs republican government → soldiers attached to anarchist/communist groups, government didn’t trust them
○ Large ideological range
○ Divided over primary objective of war → irreconcilable ideological conflict
■ Socialists / communists backed the maintenance of the Popular Front and investment in defeat of Franco
■ Anarchists, ultraleft communists wanted to progress with the ‘revolution’ believing that compromising on this would weaken the war effort
■ e.g. Violent expression of disagreement in Barcelona ‘Mgeay Days’ (1937)
Reason fo rnationalist victory: Poor military organisation
○ Had loyal generals, but lacked middleranking officers → provision of inexperienced NCOs at an important level, formed haphazardly
■ Even then the loyal generals, who had potentially valuable experience, were distrusted by the Republic
○ Less cohesive, relied on militias and elected officers
■ Strategies discussed at length, reducing speed and efficiency
■ Encouraged insubordination
○ Anarchist militias and Basques refused to be led by a central command structure 75
■ The Basques would also not provide troops to defend anywhere outside their own territory
○ Poor organisation was exacerbated by geographical locations
■ Different territories operated separately
■ Battlefields were not in range of their air force
Reason for nationalist victory: Poor foreign aid, non-commital
The cheating wife, Russia: closest ally, but Stalin was unwilling to commit Russia too fully in case fear of a German invasion
■ Involvement in Spain meant to stiffen the West against fascism
■ After appeasement, he realised this wouldn’t work and lost interest
○ France was reluctant to assist a fellow republic
■ Blum and Daladier kept out of the conflict for fear of alienating important groups in France, e.g. Catholics
○ US kept out to avoid complicating relations with rightwing, proFranco regimes in Latin America (important trading partners)
○ Britain was the biggest obstacle
■ Baldwin and Chamberlain hoped to come to terms with Germany, and revive AngloItalian relationships
■ Considered communism a bigger threat than fascism (Stalin > Franco)
● Didn’t support Franco either, Nationalist policies were repugnant
■ Strong case against risking a general European war in support of the Republic, which was increasingly leaning left
■ Placed heavy pressure on France to ban all arms sales to the Republic and also influenced the formation of the NonIntervention Committee (1936)
Reason for nationalist victory: Dwindling finances
○ Initially owned the world’s fourth largest gold reserve, controlled main cities and industrial areas
■ Eventual government orders to banks to maintain neutrality → difficulties in paying through normal international banking channels for arms shipments
○ Workers’ committees and countryside collective farms were assumed to be able to meet the financial needs of the Republic
■ They were wrong
■ Impact of the war and badlyrun government → production in Catalan (key area) fell by twothirds (19361939), causing food and raw material shortages
■ High inflation (300%) was also a problem; low wage increase (15%) ○ Impact of NonIntervention Committee
■ Starved Republic of all credit
○ Conditions of Soviet Union provision of finances
■ Requested that all Spanish gold reserves are transferred to Moscow
● Wanna guess where this goes (hint: it never goes back)
■ Provided 1,000 aircrafts, 500 tanks; 5005000 advisors arrived with Stalin’s instructions to ‘keep out of artillery range’
Nationalist Strength: Political cohesion
○ Largely due to Franco’s leadership – overcame internal disputes to balance the different Nationalists groups
■ Carlists: Left question of monarchy open, catered to their demand for legislation favouring Catholic Church
■ Falangists: Allowed to direct propaganda to influence the characteristics of a mass movement that Franco was prepared to allow; close relationships with Italy and Germany also pleased them
■ Army (no ideology) relied on Franco to maintain its position and influence ○ Franco ensured adequate representation of various Interests
■ First National Council (1937) combined Falangists, Carlists, generals, and others that were prevented from becoming too dominant or radical
nationalists strength: Superior military structure and organisation
○ Systematic method, military academies produced 30,000 trained officers
○ Centralised control of all militias (1936 – from the start!)
■ Imposed rigorous military discipline
■ Developed efficient military administration ○ Battle strategy – unimaginative, but solid
■ Would not launch an offensive unless certain that he could see it through to the end; slow, but good results
Nationalists strength: Foreign assistance
○ Vital to Franco’s successes
■ Transportation of Franco’s troops from Morocco to southern Spain leading to success in Andalusia campaign (1936)
■ Sudden increase in Italian equipment boosted Nationalist morale after a series of Republican victories
■ Another massive flow of armaments (1939) allowed Franco to crush Catalonia
○ Troops sent:
■ Italy: 50,000 ground troops, 950 tanks, 763 aircrafts, 91 warships
■ Germany: 16,000 military advisers, Condor Legion (latest aircrafts)
■ Portugal: 20,000 troops and permitted passing through border
Nationalists strength: Financially okay
○ Business community backed the Nationalists, meaning they were able to purchase arms
○ Series of financial agreements with Italy and Germany solved the problem of Spanish gold reserves being under Republican control 78
■ Italian aid provided was worth $263 million; German arms worth $215 million and in total, Franco might have received $570 million worth of aid from abroad
○ Controlled main foodproduction areas by 1936; main industrial areas by 1937
○ International trade and credit
■ The USA gave $700 million in credit
■ Significant amount of business done with multinational companies in Western democracies – lots of rubber and oil, from the US e.g. Texas Oil Company, Shell
Nature of the Spanish Civil War
● For Spain: ‘Total’ war + civil war:
○ Use of propaganda to dehumanize the enemy (despite being from the same country); atrocities committed against their own people
○ Targeted civilians in bombing raids e.g. Guernica
●Moving into modern warfare; new technology:
○ Importance of naval and air power
■ Condor Legion lengthened the war, and neither side managed to consistently gain control of the air
■ Control of the sea was significant in maintaining supply routes
■ Land warfare saw attritions and stalemates high casualties,
○ However, land battles did reflect the changing nature of warfare
■ The tactics of Blitzkrieg were evolving, with the application of tanks, artillery and air bombardment to prepare an advance
The Nationalist Uprising
The killing of Jose Calvo Sotelo leads to Franco and other right-wing individuals firmly siding with Mola
Within days, Morocco is seized by the Army of Africa
July 19, 1936: Mola announces proclamation of revolt, begins the Spanish Civil War
Morocco and the Army of Africa
While Morocco belonged to Spain, this was only true in name
It took a very short amount of time for them to gain control of Morocco
It was then used as a platform from which the southern invasion could be launched
Hitler and Mussolini’s planes transported troops across the Strait of Gibraltar
Badajoz
After brutal fighting, the Nationalists defeat the Republican forces here and take over the town
General Juan Yague was immortalized infamously in history as the “butcher of Badajoz” by committing executions in the bull ring
It was also important because it allowed for the joining of Mola’s inland and Franco’s Moroccan forces
After securing the Portuguese border as a supply area, they moved to take Irun to cut off the French and Bilbao to gain a major industrial base
Toledo
General Jose Moscardo put up a valiant fight but eventually was held under siege at the Alcazar fortress
Franco detours from his road to Madrid to help out a fellow fascist
This gives the opportunity for propaganda promoting the right as people who looked out for their own
There was also another element to it, as Toledo was known for being religious
Militias: Arming the General Populace
Jose Giral, while only serving for a short amount of time, was famous for his decision to arm the organizations that would resist fascist ones like the Falange through combat
This contributed to the “Red Terror”; formerly incarcerated leftist political prisoners running around with weapons doing as they pleased
Desecrating churches
Murdering anyone who could provide support for the Nationalists
It gave the Giral government a bad rep, and further contributed to the disorder in the left
Wartime Atrocities
Armed militias (the more radical bands) would go around committing murder and desecration
Churches were forced to go underground
This only fueled anger from the right, further unifying them and falling in line behind Franco
Possibly could have contributed to an increase in Falange membership
PCE vs POUM: Andres Nin Perez, George Orwell and the May Days Riots
The PCE (communist) soon emerged to be the most dominant force in the left
Nin was the founder of POUM, a radical organization of anarchists (Orwell was also considered one of them)
This extreme party clashed with the socialists in the May Days, a series of violent riots in Catalonia that further highlighted the divisions of the left
FET: The Falange in Politics
Led by Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera, they gained a reasonable number of seats in the Cortes
The White and Red Terrors
White Terror: repression of the left by the Nationalists
“Column of death” from Seville to Madrid
Blue Legion and Carlists were busy doing much of the same
Early 1937 saw a massacre in Malaga, church said nothing to protest it
Red Terror: left-wing political prisoners running free with weapons
Desecrating churches
Murdering right-wing officials
Naval Battles
Navy officers were loyal to Franco, but the sailors mutinied and killed them
A now Republican navy would do their best to support the Republic, taking control of Gibraltar and setting up a feeble blockade, would win the battle at Cape Palos
Only ends up being a minor hindrance, blockade is broken, thus rendering the navy ineffective
The Struggle for Madrid
Franco tried multiple times to take Madrid, but failed to do so because of the strong Republican presence
Soviet tanks, International Brigades and anarchists also contributed greatly
Instead, giving up on conquest, Franco laid siege to the city for two and a half years\
This also meant that aerial bombing from the Luftwaffe, very concentrated and devastating
Despite this, Madrid held, making it a central point for Republican forces to gather themselves, served as a morale booster
Foreign Legions: Condor and CTV
German and Italian forces, overseen by their respective leaders
Condor Legion
More on the equipment side
Luftwaffe was a huge help
Proto-Blitzkrieg, skilled troops, arms were also effective
CTV
Supplied manpower, some equipment
Many were Blackshirts, fascists dedicated to their ideology
Not too much of a help, performed quite poorly at Guadalajara
Irun
A coastal city bordering France and Spain
This was where French supplies made their way to the Republicans
Franco’s forces quickly seized the place, cutting the left off from any potential aid
Bilbao
Key area in the Basque region, known for its industrial might
It was a separatist region, meaning that it was filled with left-leaning people
Franco also established a solid grip of this region, granting him industrial power he could use to further fuel the Nationalist war effort
Guernica
Small town behind the front lines, used by the left as a communications center
It was mercilessly bombed by the Luftwaffe and Aviazione Legionaria
They even went as far as strafing fleeing civilians just to bomb them
This proved to be Franco’s stepping stone to Bilbao, but also proved a source for Republican propaganda
Guadalajara
Northeast of Madrid, had transport routes coming in and a clear path to Madrid
Here, 4 divisions of the CTV (Italian Foreign Legion) fought, with minor Nationalist support, against a lone Republican division
The Republicans manage to upset the battle and defeat the Italians
This was important because;
Incompetency of Italy
Propaganda (“Italy is terrible, useless allies, failures”)
Loss of the chance to have a direct line to hit Madrid
Jarama
Attempt by Nationalists to defeat the Republicans, a strategic position to hold
Had it all; tanks, air, land (truly a battle that encompassed everything about the war)
Woody Guthrie’s song “Jarama Valley” was popular among Republican forces
Blue Shirts
Name of the paramilitary wing of the Falange
Fought in the Civil War, not on the scale of the Nationalist Army of Africa
However, they later contributed on World War Two’s Eastern Front
The Ebro Offensive
Last battle of the war, and the longest
Republicans mount a final, desperate offensive to reunite their two split areas of control
Nationalists fight back, a bloody stalemate settles in
Right is more powerful however, as they have the firepower that the left has exhausted
Marks the end of the Republic’s hopes of winning
Effect of the Spanish Civil War: Socially
○ Human cost / casualties:
■ 100,000 Republicans killed; about 70,000 Nationalists.
■ Killing continued after war in the ‘White Terror’ (Franco’s Giant Cumming Project in 1939) with a further 40,000–200,000 casualties ○ Concentration camps and prisons
■ Republicans and their sympathizers ○ Seizing of Republican children for ‘reeducation’
■ Placed with Nationalist / Catholic families or sent to orphanages to be indoctrinated against the views and actions of their own parents ○ Long lasting divisions and hatred in Spanish society
Effect of the Spanish Civil War: Economic cost
○ Financial losses, economic problems
■ 1015% of wealth destroyed
■ Per capita income 28% lower than in 1935
■ High inflation due to fighting of the war, and printing of money to finance it
○ Industrial destruction
■ 70% of Madrid’s factory machinery needed to be replaced
■ Communications systems, including tram network, needed to be rebuilt
■ Everyone is dead, there are no skilled workers + general labour shortage
■ Merchant shipping destroyed ○ Agricultural sector okay though, but remained inefficient, ineffective
■ Franco reversed Republican land reform → periodic unemployment for labourers, landowners refused modernization
○ Britain demanded repayment of debt, Germany wanted money for aid provided 80
■ Debt would remain until after WWI → opportunity for foreign (mostly US, Britain, France) influence
○ No modernization took place for 36 years
Effect of the Spanish Civil War: Political
○ Franco dictator
■ Exodus of Spaniards to neighbouring countries, included intellectuals (teachers, lawyers, researchers, doctors and famous writers, poets, artists and musicians)
■ Those that remained had to conform to Franco’s authoritarian, Catholic and conservative views ○ Law of Political Responsibility (1939)
■ Made Republican supporters liable to punishment
■ Allowed seizure of Republican land → vast amounts of land to the state
○ Restoration of the power of the privileged class, control working class
■ Wage cuts
■ Outlaw industrial political activism
■ Employment for Republicans who had escaped imprisonment was impossible
■ Use of Civil Guard to preserve inequalities of social and working system in rural areas ○ Restart of the ‘era of the national church’
■ ‘The Catholic Church enjoyed a degree of state support that was much greater than at any time since the 18th century. Government and church combined to preach order, hierarchy and discipline.’ – Lannon
■ Church took up cause of workers; linked with their movements
○ End of Basques and Catalans for autonomy
■ Use of Catalan, Basque and Galician languages was forbidden and all power was centralized in Madrid
○ Suppression and removal of all political opposition → period of political stability
■ More unified than ever until WWII
■ Then Franco got kind of shakey
■ And then died
○ Europe shunned Spain until his death (after which democracy was restored)
● For the world
● Soviet Union and communism
○ Defeat in Spain undermined international credibility
■ Cynical contribution to Republican → divisions in leftwing + disillusioned former supporters of the Soviet Union
■ Lost intellectual sympathy in the West
○ Accentuated Soviet and German tensions; pushed Soviet foreign policy away from an alliance with Western powers
■ Stalin lost respect for Britain and France as allies against Hitler (appeasement, and nonintervention, ultimate turning point was Munich Agreement)
■ Began to look towards a Nazi German alliance
● Hitler and Nazi Germany
○ Highlighted importance of air and land power
■ Effectiveness of applying air cover for ground troops in Blitzkrieg using the Italian defeat at Guadalajara as a point of reference
■ Testing of Luftwaffe, bulletresistance fuel tanks and discovered valuable things, e.g. need for radio contact in armoured vehicles
■ Bombing seemed like a better idea (effective, to some extent) ○ Brought them closer to Mussolini’s Fascist Italy
■ Prevented a reconciliation between members of Stresa Front ○ British and French nonintervention + appeasement strengthened Hitler’s position
■ Also made Nazi Germany seem capable enough to defend the world from the biggest threat ever, in all eternity, the most evil, the most terrifying, the literal worst, the baddest, terribleest, communism!!!
● Britain and France
○ Spanish Civil War made them want less war
○ Polarized political nature of foreign intervention heightened threat of escalation into a general war and drove up support for appeasement
■ Continued pursuit of policy of appeasement and nonintervention actually encouraged Hitler to be more aggressive
○ Communism is still the biggest threat
■ Apparently were unable to see the Condor Legion
● The USA
■ Offered no tangible assistance
○ Strengthening of isolationist sentiment and shunned Spain
■ Excluded from the postwar recovery package for Europe, the Marshall Aid