1/36
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
composition of the commonwealth parliament
the crown, governor general
the senate, upper house 76
the house of rep, lower house 151
role of the house of representatives
initiate and make laws
determine the government
act as a house of review
control government expenditure
represent the people
scrutinise government administration
initiate and make laws house of rep
includes bills that change or amend existing law
bill is debated, scrutinised, and considered by a parliemtnary committee
control government expenditure - house of reps
bill must be passed through both houses of parliament before a government can collect taxes or spend money, but only the house of reps can introduce money bills
money bills
proposed law that imposes taxes and collects revenue, also known as an appropriation bill
scrutinise government administration - house of reps
government is expected to be answerable and accountable for their decisions, policies and actions
upheld by enabling members to question ministers about their policies and legislation during question time
role of the senate in law making
act as a house of review
allows for equal representation of the states
initiate bills
scrutinise bills and government administration
act as a house of review senate
decide whether to pass a bill with or without amendments in the case of a money bill, or request amendments
can insist on changes before law is passed
acts as an important check on government law making particularly if they don’t have majority
initiate bills - senate
except money bills, very rare
scrutinise bills and government administration - senate
has a number of committees that can scrutinise legislation or particular government activities, policy or expenditure
senate standing committees for the scrutiny of bills that assesses proposals and the affect they would have on individual rights, freedoms, obligations and the rule of law
rule of law
the principle that everyone in society is bound by law and must obey it, law should be fair and clear so people are willing and are able to obey them
composition of the victorian parliament
the king, governor of victoria
legislative council, upper 40
legislative assembly, lower 88
role of the legislative assembly
initiate and pass bills
form government
scrutinise government administration
represent people
act as a house of review
control government expenditure
role of the legislative council
act as a house of review
initiate and pass bills
scrutinise government administration through committee process
the crown
1 governor at federal, 6 at state
roles of the crown in law making
granting royal assent
withholding royal assent
appointing the executive council
granting royal assent
required to approve bills before they can become laws
normally given as a matter of course on the advice of the pm, ministers at cwth, premier of vic
withholding royal assent
refusing to approve a bill
rare
constitution specifies circumstances where governor general can withhold royal assent at federal level
appointing the executive council
group consisting of the pm and senior ministers
responsible for administering and implementing the law by giving advice about the gov and departments such as whether to approve regulation
exclusive powers overview
cwth
51 and 52
currency, foreign affairs, defence
concurrent powers overview
cwth and state
52
marriage, taxation, banking
residual powers overview
state
106, 107, 108
public hospitals, public schools
residual powers
law making powers left to the state
not listed in the constitution
criminal, medical procedures, road laws, education, public transport
exclusive powers
powers which can only be exercised exclusively by the cwth
defence, currency, customs and border protection (immigration, imports and exports, border security)
90, 114, 115
concurrent powers
law making powers they share
trade, taxation, marriage and divorce, postal, telegraphic, telephonic and similar services
taxation concurrent powers
cwth - income tax, GST
state - stamp duty, payroll tax
purpose of section 109
helps resolve conflicts and inconsistencies between state and commonwealth laws
section 109
when a law of a state is inconsistent with a law of the cwth the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency be invalid
how does section 109 work
can act as a restriction on the states to implementing their legislation
doesn’t automatically operate, law needs to be challenged in court to be declared invalid
if the cwth law is abrogated or changed in the future and the state law continues to be in existence it will be in force and have effect
even if they don’t appear to be conflict the high court has held that a state law will be inconsistent if the cwth intended it to be a complex statement on a particular subject matter or area
cwth can sometimes explicitly state that state laws continue to operate
jurisdiction of the high court in law making
given under section 75
commonwealth or person suing or being sued on behalf of it is a party
between states
residents of different states
state and resident of another state
what is the brislan case
1980s case involving wireless set
constitution and legislation involved in the brislan case
section 51v grants cwth power to legislate on postal, telegraphic, telephonic and other like services
cwth passed the wireless telegraphy act 1905 which required all wireless set owners to have a license
details of the brislan case
defendant dulcie williams was convicted and fined for owning a wireless set without a license
arguments in the brislan case
defendant challenged the validity of the act, arguing that the constitution gave no power to the cwth the make laws in relation to radio broadcasting and therefore the act was ultra vires
decision of the brislan case
majority justices held that wireless sets were a form of telephonic service and fell within the scope of section 51v
significance of the brislan case
resulted in a change to the division of cwth law making powers to include broadcasting to a wireless set
somewhat reduced state powers as they can’t make any conflicting laws
significance for future types of communication and technological advancements as section 51v talks about “other like devices”
limitations/controversies of the brislan case
some commentators argued that it gave the cwth too much power
while it’s arguable that brislan provides the cwth with the power to regulate the internet as a like service it hasn’t been confirmed by the high court case
bringing a case to court requires standing, and it’s expensive and time consuming