1/10
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Who carried out the Martha’s Vineyard study in 1963?
William Labov.
Where was Labov’s Martha’s Vineyard study conducted?
The study was conducted on Martha’s Vineyard, a small island off the coast of Massachusetts in the United States.
What did William Labov investigate in the Martha’s Vineyard study?
William Labov investigated how social attitudes and identity influence language change and pronunciation.
Which pronunciation features did Labov study on Martha’s Vineyard?
Labov studied the centralisation of the diphthongs /aɪ/ and /aʊ/, which occur in words such as “price” and “mouth”.
What is centralisation in Labov’s study?
Centralisation refers to the pronunciation of diphthongs with a more central vowel sound rather than the standard pronunciation.
How did Labov collect data in the Martha’s Vineyard study?
Labov recorded interviews with island residents from different age groups, occupations, and social backgrounds.
Which group of speakers showed the strongest use of centralised pronunciation?
Young fishermen and people strongly connected to the traditional island community showed the strongest centralisation of the diphthongs.
Which group of speakers used less centralised pronunciation?
Speakers who were more oriented towards the mainland United States or who wanted to leave the island tended to use less centralisation.
Why did some islanders increase their use of centralised pronunciation?
Some islanders increased their use of centralised pronunciation as a way of expressing local identity and distancing themselves from mainland visitors and tourists.
What did Labov conclude about language and social identity?
Labov concluded that language change can be influenced by social identity and that speakers may exaggerate linguistic features to show group membership.
Why is the Martha’s Vineyard study important in sociolinguistics?
The study demonstrated that language variation is not random but linked to social factors such as identity, attitudes, and community loyalty.