1/36
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Discharge of covenant
complete removal of a covenant so it no longer exists
Modification of covenant
covenant remains but terms are changed
Restrictive covenant duration
can last indefinitely unless discharged or modified
Obsolete covenant
covenant no longer provides practical benefit due to changes in land or neighbourhood
Merger
same person owns both dominant and servient land
Effect of merger
covenant automatically ends
Reason for merger rule
cannot enforce covenant against oneself
Example (merger)
owner of dominant land buys servient land → covenant extinguished
Express release
formal agreement to remove covenant
Requirement (express release)
must be by deed
Typical scenario
dominant owner releases covenant in exchange for payment
Effect of express release
permanently removes covenant
Implied discharge
dominant owner allows breaches without enforcement
Effect of implied discharge
suggests covenant abandoned
Nature of implied discharge
rare in practice
Statutory discharge
application to Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) to remove or modify covenant
Scope of s84 LPA 1925
applies only to restrictive covenants
Ground (obsolete)
covenant outdated due to changes in character of land or area
Ground (reasonable use)
covenant prevents reasonable use of land
Ground (agreement)
dominant owner consents expressly or impliedly
Ground (no injury)
discharge causes no harm to dominant land
Outcome of s84
tribunal may discharge or modify covenant
Exam summary (merger)
same owner → covenant ends
Exam summary (express release)
deed removes covenant
Exam summary (implied discharge)
ignored breaches suggest abandonment
Exam summary (statutory discharge)
tribunal removes/modifies if obsolete or impeding use
Enforcement (original covenantor)
liable at common law for both positive and restrictive covenants
Enforcement (successor covenantor common law)
not bound by burden for either type
Equity burden (Tulk v Moxhay)
only restrictive covenants bind successors
Mutual benefit and burden
possible enforcement of positive and restrictive covenants if benefit taken
Chain of indemnities
enables indirect enforcement of positive covenants
Building scheme
allows mutual enforcement of restrictive covenants
Leasehold workaround
positive and restrictive covenants enforceable through leases
Discharge method (merger)
applies to both positive and restrictive covenants
Discharge method (express release)
applies to both types
Discharge method (implied release)
applies to both types
Statutory discharge (s84)
applies only to restrictive covenants