Forms of Renewables & Info

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/27

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

last minute ftw

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

28 Terms

1
New cards

Wind Power - Pros

  • Produces no greenhouse gasses during operation

  • Widely available, esp. offshore

  • UK Hornsea Project One can power over 1 million homes

2
New cards

Wind Power - Cons

  • Visual and noise pollution

  • Bird and bat collision risks

  • Intermittent generation depending on wind avaliability

3
New cards

Wind Power - Cost

£1.3 - 1.5 million per MW

4
New cards

Wind Power - Sustainability

Yes, sustainable in the long term if environmental impacts are mitigated thanks to low maintenance after setup

5
New cards

Wave Power - Pros

  • High energy density

  • Predictable, consistent energy

  • Minimal land use

6
New cards

Wave Power - Cons

  • Still in early development

  • Risk to marine life and navigation

  • Limited suitable locations

7
New cards

Wave Power - Costs

£3 - 4 million per MW

8
New cards

Wave Power - Sustainability

Potentially yes - must be deployed sensitively, but high costs and impact limits use currently

9
New cards

Tidal Power - Pros

  • Predictable energy source with low emissions

  • Long infrastructure lifespan (120 years)

  • Can help with flood protection

10
New cards

Tidal Power - Cons

  • High construction costs

  • May disrupt tidal ecosystems and sediment transport

11
New cards

Tidal Power - Cost

£3.5 - 6 million per MW

12
New cards

Tidal Power - Sustainability

Yes, long term - once built offers clean power indefinitely but environments must be managed.

13
New cards

Hydroelectric - Pros

  • Reliable ‘base-load’ power

  • Reservoirs can store energy, such as the Dinorwig Power Station in Wales

14
New cards

Hydroelectric - Cons

  • Ecosystem distruption, e.g. fish migration

  • Limited by suitable terrain

  • Can cause flooding of land

15
New cards

Hydroelectric - Cost

£1.5 - 2 million per MW

16
New cards

Hydroelectric - Sustainability

Yes in the right locations - has a long lifespan but must use technology such as fish ladders to be environmentally sustainable

17
New cards

Biomass - Pros

  • Can use waste materials

  • Provides consistent power unlike wind/solar

  • Co-firing possible in old coal plants like Drax power plant

18
New cards

Biomass - Cons

  • Releases CO2 (though lower than fossil fuels)

  • Can compete with food crops for field space and cause deforestation if unmanaged

19
New cards

Biomass - Cost

£0.5 - 1 million per MW

20
New cards

Biomass - Sustainability

Conditionally sustainable: if sourced from waste or sustainably grown crops. Unsustainable if it leads to land misuse

21
New cards

Hydrogen Fuel Cell - Pros

  • Zero emissions at point of use

  • Can power transport and remote areas

  • High energy conversion efficiency

22
New cards

Hydrogen Fuel Cell - Cons

  • Most hydrogen today comes from fossil fuels (grey hydrogen)

  • Storage and transport are difficult

23
New cards

Hydrogen Fuel Cell - Cost

£4 - 6 million per MW

24
New cards

Hydrogen Fuel Cell - Sustainability

Yes - if hydrogen is produced via electrolysis using renewable energy. Grey hydrogen is NOT sustainable

25
New cards

Solar - Pros

  • No emissions

  • Suitable for households or smaller scale farms

  • Good for sunny regions in southern England

26
New cards

Solar - Cons

  • Intermittent - only works with sunlight

  • Needs large space for large-scale production, v. land intensive

27
New cards

Solar - Cost

£0.7 - 1 million per MW

28
New cards

Solar - Sustainability

Yes - low emissions and long panel lifespan (25 - 30 years), however recycling of panels and land use are key concerns