1/27
last minute ftw
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Wind Power - Pros
Produces no greenhouse gasses during operation
Widely available, esp. offshore
UK Hornsea Project One can power over 1 million homes
Wind Power - Cons
Visual and noise pollution
Bird and bat collision risks
Intermittent generation depending on wind avaliability
Wind Power - Cost
£1.3 - 1.5 million per MW
Wind Power - Sustainability
Yes, sustainable in the long term if environmental impacts are mitigated thanks to low maintenance after setup
Wave Power - Pros
High energy density
Predictable, consistent energy
Minimal land use
Wave Power - Cons
Still in early development
Risk to marine life and navigation
Limited suitable locations
Wave Power - Costs
£3 - 4 million per MW
Wave Power - Sustainability
Potentially yes - must be deployed sensitively, but high costs and impact limits use currently
Tidal Power - Pros
Predictable energy source with low emissions
Long infrastructure lifespan (120 years)
Can help with flood protection
Tidal Power - Cons
High construction costs
May disrupt tidal ecosystems and sediment transport
Tidal Power - Cost
£3.5 - 6 million per MW
Tidal Power - Sustainability
Yes, long term - once built offers clean power indefinitely but environments must be managed.
Hydroelectric - Pros
Reliable ‘base-load’ power
Reservoirs can store energy, such as the Dinorwig Power Station in Wales
Hydroelectric - Cons
Ecosystem distruption, e.g. fish migration
Limited by suitable terrain
Can cause flooding of land
Hydroelectric - Cost
£1.5 - 2 million per MW
Hydroelectric - Sustainability
Yes in the right locations - has a long lifespan but must use technology such as fish ladders to be environmentally sustainable
Biomass - Pros
Can use waste materials
Provides consistent power unlike wind/solar
Co-firing possible in old coal plants like Drax power plant
Biomass - Cons
Releases CO2 (though lower than fossil fuels)
Can compete with food crops for field space and cause deforestation if unmanaged
Biomass - Cost
£0.5 - 1 million per MW
Biomass - Sustainability
Conditionally sustainable: if sourced from waste or sustainably grown crops. Unsustainable if it leads to land misuse
Hydrogen Fuel Cell - Pros
Zero emissions at point of use
Can power transport and remote areas
High energy conversion efficiency
Hydrogen Fuel Cell - Cons
Most hydrogen today comes from fossil fuels (grey hydrogen)
Storage and transport are difficult
Hydrogen Fuel Cell - Cost
£4 - 6 million per MW
Hydrogen Fuel Cell - Sustainability
Yes - if hydrogen is produced via electrolysis using renewable energy. Grey hydrogen is NOT sustainable
Solar - Pros
No emissions
Suitable for households or smaller scale farms
Good for sunny regions in southern England
Solar - Cons
Intermittent - only works with sunlight
Needs large space for large-scale production, v. land intensive
Solar - Cost
£0.7 - 1 million per MW
Solar - Sustainability
Yes - low emissions and long panel lifespan (25 - 30 years), however recycling of panels and land use are key concerns