1/116
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Which events and documents from British history were essential to the colonists' understanding of their relationship to government?
Magna Carta - established the principal that everyone, including the king, was subject to the law. Introduced trial by jury and protection from arbitrary imprisonment. (Influenced colonial views on justice and liberty).
Bill of Rights - limited the powers of the monarchy and affirmed certain rights for Parliament and individuals. Introduced right to petition, no quartering of soldiers, and no taxation without representation.
Petition of Right - asserted that the king could not tax without Parliament's consent or imprison people unlawfully. (Influenced limited government).
Common Law - rooted in centuries of judicial decisions. Emphasized the importance of precedent and the rights of individuals.
Articles of Confederation
First constitution of the US; created a weak national government with limited powers. Gave most authority to the individual states.
Pros and Cons of AoC (and achievements)
Pros: Gave independence and control to states over their own affairs, unified the colonies during the revolutionary war, set up a system for adding new states (Helped lead the colonies to win the Revolutionary War, Northwest Ordinance)
Con: Weak central government with no power to tax/enforce laws, no executive branch to carry out laws or court system to settle disputes, difficult to pass laws/amend the Articles, states acted sort of like separate countries which caused economic problems and conflict.
Northwest Ordinance
Enacted in 1787, it is considered one of the most significant achievements of the Articles of Confederation. It established a system for setting up governments in the western territories so they could eventually join the Union on an equal footing with the original 13 states
What was Shays' Rebellion and how did it help trigger the Constitutional Convention of 1787?
An armed uprising led by Daniel Shays, who was a former revolutionary war soldier, in Massachusetts. Farmers were mad because taxes were high, they were in debt, and they had threats of losing their land. The state government wasn't helping, so they rebelled to shut down the courts. At the time the federal government was under the Articles of Confederation, so they were too weak to step in and Massachusetts had to raise its own militia to stop it.
It showed that the national government had no power to keep order or help struggling states; convinced leaders that the US needed a stronger federal government, leading to the Constitutional Convention of 1787.
Virginia Plan
"Large state" proposal for the new constitution, calling for proportional representation in both houses of a bicameral Congress. The plan favored larger states and thus prompted smaller states to come back with their own plan for apportioning representation.
New Jersey Plan
"Small-state plan" proposing equal representation by state, regardless of population. Small states feared that the more populous states would dominate the agenda under a proportional system.
Great Compromise (Connecticut Compromise)
Combining parts of the Virginia and New Jersey Plan regarding representation. Formed a bicameral legislature (or a two-house Congress).
House of Reps - rep based on population
Senate - equal rep, two senators per state
The Bill of Rights
The first ten amendments to the Constitution
Why was the issue of whether a Bill of Rights should be included in the Constitution such a big issue during the Ratification debates?
Federalist: Bill of Rights is unnecessary because Constitution already limited government power by listing what it could do, and there were implied rights. The structure of the government itself would protect individual freedoms (separation of powers, checks and balances).
Anti-Federalist: Feared a strong central government could become tyrannical, and citizens needed a clear, written guarantee of basic freedoms (speech, religion, trial by jury, etc). Without it, the government could abuse power and silence the people.
How did Congress justify the creation of a national bank?
The necessary and proper clause. Hamilton argued that Congress had implied powers under the Constitution and claimed that a national bank was necessary to manage the nation's finances, hold government funds, and help issue a stable currency.
How did Congress' use of the necessary and proper clause strengthen the argument that a Bill of Rights was necessary?
Showed how the federal government could expand its power beyond what was explicitly written in the Constitution. Allows Congress to pass out laws needed to carry out its duties, even if those laws aren't mentioned in the Constitution. This worried people who feared the government might use this to limit individual freedoms or overreach. Because Constitution didn't initially include a clear list of protected rights, people argued that without explicit guarantees the government might abuse this clause.
Why was Washington's decision about the bank so important?
- Set a key precedent for interpreting the Constitution broadly (federal gvt. could use implied powers to carry out its duties)
- Strengthened federal authority by supporting a stronger national government capable of managing the country's finances and economy.
- Helped establish financial stability by creating a central institution to handle gvt. funds, issue currency, and regulate credit.
- Showed that the executive branch could help shape how the Constitution is used in practice
McCulloch v. Maryland
Supreme Court case that strengthened federal authority and upheld the constitutionality of the Bank of the United States by establishing that the State of Maryland did not have power to tax the bank.
McCulloch, a bank official, refused to pay the tax Maryland put on the bank. Bank was created under the necessary and proper clause, Maryland could not tax the bank. "The power to tax is the power to destroy." States cannot destroy or interfere with federal institutions.
Does the Bill of Rights grant rights or prohibit government action? Explain the difference.
It prohibits government action that would violate the rights people already have. People are born with natural rights (freedom of speech, religion, privacy, etc) which don't come from the government. The Bill of Rights was written to limit the power of the federal government and protect these natural rights.
If the Bill of Rights granted rights, that means the government can take them away. By prohibiting them, it recognizes that the rights belong to the people, and the governments job is to protect them, not control them.
Power
the fundamental capability to do something
Authority
the right to use power
Legitimacy
popular acceptance of the governing
John Locke and the Social Contract
- Locke's social contract is based off the "consent of the governed."
- Government has a responsibility to protect peoples inalienable rights (life, liberty, pursuit of property)
- If the government fails to uphold this contract, people have a duty to revolt.
Declaration of Independence Writers
Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, Roger Sherman, Robert R. Livingston
Declaration of Independence significance
Established, for the first time in world history, a new independent nation based on the first principles of the rule of law, limited government, unalienable rights, and the right to alter or abolish a government.
Declared the 13 colonies as independent states
Preamble
"We the People, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty, to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution, for the United States of America."
Significance of Preamble in terms of a social contract
Shows a give and a get: people give consent and legitimacy for the government to govern, and in return get the government we have.
Limited Government
The idea that certain restrictions should be placed on government to protect the natural rights of citizens.
Checks and Balances
A system that allows each branch of government to limit the powers of the other branches in order to prevent abuse of power
Judicial Review
review by the US Supreme Court of the constitutional validity of a legislative act.
Separation of Powers
Constitutional division of powers among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches, with the legislative branch making law, the executive applying and enforcing the law, and the judiciary interpreting the law
Federalism
A system in which power is divided between the national and state governments
Popular Sovereignty
A belief that ultimate power resides in the people.
House of Representatives Qualifications
25 years old, citizen for 7 years, resident of state
House of Representatives Term
2 years
House of Representatives Election
Citizens from their (congressional) district, every 2 years
Powers exclusive to House of Representatives
Deals with any bill that deals with money, has the power to impeach the president.
Apportionment
Distribution of representatives among the states based on the population of each state. Every 10 years
Census
The official count pr survey of a population; every 10 years
Redistricting
The drawing of new electoral district boundary lines in response to population changes. Every 10 years
Rules of redistricting
based on population; can't purposely dilute minority strength; can enhance minority if race is not the "predominant" factor; may do it more than every 10 years
Gerrymandering
manipulate the boundaries of (an electoral constituency) so as to favor one party or class.
Cracking and Packing (Gerrymandering)
Cracking involves spreading out voters of a particular type among many districts in order to deny them a large voting bloc in any particular district.
Packing is to concentrate as many voters of one type into a single electoral district to reduce their influence in other districts.
How could you as a voter help solve the problem of gerrymandering?
Protest, use pop. sov. idk bro
Senate
100 members, 2 senators from each state
Qualifications for Senate
minimum age 30, U.S. citizen for 9 years, and resident of the state represented
Senate Election
Before: Senators were chosen by state legislatures
Now: Senators are chosen by direct vote of the people. Rotates so that 1/3 of Senators are elected every 2 years but Senators serve for 6 years
Role of Vice President in the Senate
President of the Senate (tie breaker)
Senate Powers
1. Can approve of the president's picks for the Supreme Court and his Cabinet
2. Will hold the trial for a president after he is impeached
27 Amendment
prohibits the decrease/increase of Congress members income
Supremacy Clause (Article VI)
constitutional declaration that the Constitution and laws made under its provisions are the greatest law of the land.
Federal law is supreme over state law.
Article 1 Section 9
Powers denied to Congress
- No titles of nobility
- No tax exports
- No spending money without approval
- No jailing people without charges (habeas corpus with exception for emergencies)
- No ex post facto ( if you did something legal on Monday, and it is now illegal on Tuesday, you cannot be punished for it. )
How a Bill Becomes Law
1. Written
2. Discussed in committee + voted on
3. Discussed in House of Reps. and Senate + voted on in both
4. President signs it or vetoes it (which brings back to Congress, needs 2/3 vote to override veto)
Introducing a bill in the House
Members can hand bill to clerk or drop it in box (hopper), bill is numbered and printed, goes into Congress session (where it is killed or proceeds into other chamber)
Introducing a bill in the Senate
Members bill should be recognized by presiding officer and announced, bill is numbered and printed, goes into Congress session (where it is killed or proceeds into other chamber)
Why must tax bills start in the house?
House of Representatives represents the people, the people are paying the taxes. The power to tax should be controlled by the people.
Role of interest groups in proposing and advocating for legislation
Interest groups influence lawmakers by proposing ideas, providing info, and lobbying (people or groups try to influence lawmakers to pass, change, or block laws) to support or oppose legislation that affects their causes or members
Role of committees in the legislative process
Responsible for screening proposed laws (bills) and deciding which will go to the floor for consideration
Debate in the House
Limited by rules
Time for speaking is short and controlled by leadership
Aimed at being efficient because there are a lot of members
Debate in the Senate
Not controlled like the house
Senators can speak for as long as they want to (filibusters)
Designed for deep discussion and slower decision making
Filibusters and cloture
- filibuster: to debate on a bill for as long as possible to prevent action on it
- cloture: the procedure to end a filibuster
Conference committees and reconciliation process
Conference committees - Made up of members from both House and Senate that work out differences when each chamber passes different versions of the same bill. Create a compromise bill
Reconciliation process - A faster way to pass budget-related bills in the Senate with a simple majority. No filibuster allowed.
Veto, pocket veto and veto override
Veto - President rejects a bill sent by Congress, sending it back with reasons.
Pocket Veto - If Congress adjourns within 10 days of sending a bill and the president does nothing, it dies without a signature.
Veto Override - Congress can pass a bill despite the president's veto if both the House and Senate get a 2/3 majority vote to override it.
Role of partisanship in creating and enforcing rules of Congress
- Majority party controls the agenda, decides which bills come up for a vote, and sets debate limits
- Parties use rules to advance their goals and block the opposition's priorities
- Partisan loyalty often influences how strictly rules are applied or ignored
- Leads to more conflict when parties disagree strongly.
Partisanship shapes how Congress operates and what gets done.
Article 1, Section 8
lists specific powers of Congress
- power to establish and maintain an army and navy
- to establish post offices
- to create courts
- to regulate commerce between the states
- to declare war
- to raise money
- create a capital city
- copyrights and patents
- weights and measures
It also includes a clause known as the Elastic Clause which allows it to pass any law necessary for the carrying out of the previously listed powers.
What changes in the economy have made copyright and patents/weights and measures important?
Going from mercantilism, where people thought there was a set amount of money in the world, to capitalism, where there is an infinite amount of possible gains, made the need for copyright for businesses important. Weights and measures were needed for commerce to have a set system.
Expressed Powers in A1S8
- Taxing and spending
- Borrowing money
- Regulating commerce
- Establishing rules for naturalization/bankruptcy
- Coining money and regulating its value
- Establishing post offices and roads
- Declaring war, raising and supporting armies, maintaining a navy
- Calling forth the militia and organizing it
- Making laws necessary and proper
Implied Powers in A1S8 (McCulloch v Maryland)
Necessary and Proper clause
- Important because gives Congress the flexibility to make laws needed to carry out its enumerated powers.
"The power to tax is the power to destroy" States cannot destroy or interfere with federal institutions.
Importance of Commerce Clause
Allows Congress to regulate business activities among the states
Courts interpretation of Commerce Clause 1830-1930
Court limited the scope of federal economic regulation under the Commerce Clause
The New Deal and the Court Packing Plan
the New Deal expanded federal power (FDR proposed a plan to add up to six new justices to the Supreme Court for every justice over 70 who didn't retire), and the Court Packing Plan pressured the Supreme Court to support that shift. FAILED
The Commerce Clause - 1930s-1990
Court began upholding New Deal laws and allowed Congress to regulate interstate trade and intrastate activities that affected interstate commerce (Wickard v. Filburn)
Major tool for expanding federal power, though the Court began setting limits again later.
Wickard v. Filburn
Farmer grew more wheat than allowed because he was being funded by congress. Congress said they could regulate that because even though it was for his personal consumption, it would effect interstate commerce. Expansion of power of the Commerce Clause
Commerce Clause 1990s-today
Court has narrowed Commerce Clause's reach compared to earlier decades, emphasizing limits on federal authority.
IMPORTANT: United States v. Lopez
United States v Lopez
The Commerce Clause of the Constitution does not give Congress the power to prohibit mere possession of a gun near a school, because gun possession by itself is not an economic activity that affects interstate commerce even indirectly.
Read the news story linked here. If you were to bring this case to a federal court, how might you use what you've learned about the Commerce Clause to argue this case. While the Supreme Court has ruled that Congress has no power to create federal, nationwide mandates regarding abortion (Dobbs v Jackson (2022), might Congress have the power to regulate the distribution of mifespristone nationally? Support your answer.
Because Congress has the power to regulate interstate commerce in the commerce clause, it has control over the distribution of mifepristone.
Why is Article II so much shorter than Article I?
Article 2 sets up the executive branch, which has more limited and defined powers compared to the legislative branch in Article 1.
Article 2 mainly focuses on the President's roles and powers, while Article 1 details Congress's specific powers, procedures, and structures.
Speaker of the House
Mike Johnson
Majority Leader House
Steve Scalise
Majority Whip House
Tom Emmer
Minority Leader House
Hakeem Jeffries
Minority Whip House
Katherine Clark
President of the Senate
JD Vance
President Pro Tempore
Chuck Grassley
Majority Leader Senate
John Thune
Majority Whip (Senate)
John Barrasso (R)
Minority Leader (Senate)
Chuck Schumer
Minority Whip (Senate)
Dick Durbin
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Alito, Sotomayor, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett, Jackson, Thomas, Kagan
HOR Louisiana rep District 1
Steve Scalise
HOR Louisiana rep District 2
Troy Carter
HOR Louisiana rep District 3
Clay Higgins
HOR Louisiana rep District 4
Mike Johnson
HOR Louisiana rep District 5
Julia Letlow
HOR Louisiana rep District 6
Cleo Fields
Senate Louisiana rep 1
John Kennedy
Senate Louisiana rep 2
Bill Cassidy
Secretary of State
Marco Rubio
Secretary of Defense
Pete Hegseth
Attorney General
Pam Bondi
Secretary of Treasury
Scott Bessent
Secretary Commerce
Howard Lutnick
What is executive power?
the power to execute, enforce, and administer law