week 5- appraising evidence

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 3 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/19

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

20 Terms

1
New cards

PEDro

tool used to assess risk of bias in a study

2
New cards

0-3

what PEDro score qualifies a poor rating?

3
New cards

4-5

what PEDro score qualifies a fair rating?

4
New cards

6-8

what PEDro score qualifies a good rating?

5
New cards

9-10

what PEDro score qualifies an excellent rating?

6
New cards

eligibility criteria

PEDro criterion that is not included in the overall scoring

7
New cards

random allocation

gets point for the PEDro scale if the report states that allocation was random

8
New cards

concealed allocation

gets point for the PEDro scale if the person who determines whether to include a subject is unaware of what group they will be allocated to

9
New cards

baseline comparability

gets point for the PEDro scale if the report includes at least one measure of the condition being treated and at least one different outcome measure at baseline

10
New cards

blind subjects

gets point for the PEDro scale if the subjects were unable to tell which group they were in

11
New cards

blind therapist

gets point for the PEDro scale if the therapists were unable to discriminate whether individual subjects had or had not received the treatment being assessed

12
New cards

blind assessors

gets point for the PEDro scale if the assessors are unable to determine which individuals had received the treatment being assessed

13
New cards

triple-blind

name for subjects, therapists, and assessors all being blinded

14
New cards

single-blind

name for just the subjects being blinded in a study

15
New cards

double-blind

name for any 2 groups (being the subjects, therapists, and assessors) being blinded in a study

16
New cards

adequate follow-up

gets point for the PEDro scale if both the initial and final number of subjects from whom key outcome measures were obtained are stated

17
New cards

85%

percent of subject retention to get credit for adequate follow-up if outcomes are measured at several points in time

18
New cards

intention-to-treat analysis

gets point for the PEDro scale if the subjects were assessed as though they had received their assigned treatment, even if they were noncompliant or didn’t actually receive treatment for some other reason

19
New cards

between-group comparisons

gets point for the PEDro scale if between-group statistics are analyzed

20
New cards

point estimates and variabiltiy

gets point for the PEDro scale if the study includes a difference in group outcomes and variability measures such as SDs