Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
criticism
the process by which historical evidence is derived from historical data
external criticism raises the questions
“Is the historical source what it appears or claims to be?”.
“Is it acceptable as evidence?”
Another name for external criticism
lower criticism
external criticism
concerned with establishing the genuineness or authenticity of data by means of examining the physical characteristics of the evidences.
scrutinized
the language and writing style used in the material.
historian asks the following questions to test for authenticity (where) Localization and Provenance
Where was the material produced?
Is the document where it ought to be?
Where was the material produced?
historian asks the following questions to test for authenticity (when) Date and Period
When was the source written/produced?
Is the material under scrutiny consistent with the historical characteristics of the
time when it was produced?
Did the writer report about things, events or places that could not have been known during that period?
Is anachronism present? Is there any anachronistic reference to events?
historian asks the following questions to test for authenticity (who) Authorship
Who wrote/produced the material?
historian asks the following questions to test for authenticity (what) Analysis and Integrity
From what pre-existing material was it produced?
What is the type of ink used?
What is the materials’ paper quality?
In what original form was it produced?
Is the material the material garbled wholly or in part?
What are the reasons for such garbled documents?
Is the material forged or misleading?
Historians guard for fabricated documents, what are the reasons for fabricating historical documents
To bolster a false claim or title
Documents are counterfeited for sale
Political propaganda
To mislead certain contemporaries
Historians guard for fabricated documents; check for….
anachronisms
Historians guard for fabricated documents; verify the
handwriting, signature, seal, letterhead and watermark
Historians guard for fabricated documents; origins
provenance of the documents
Restoration of documents (step 1) Collect
Get as many copies of the doubtful text.
Restoration of documents (step 2) Compare
In cases wherein some words, phrases, or whole passages are not found in others, ask the following questions:
(a) Among the copies collected, are those words or phrases additions?
(b) or are those omissions from the others?
Restoration of documents (step 3) Classify
Categorize the available copies according to their “families”.
(“Families” are groups of text which closely resemble each other. If the texts belong to the same family, it is highly probable that they originated from the same master copy.)
Restoration of documents (step 4) Distinguish
Within each family, establish the comparative age of the texts. If the members of the same family are mostly copied from each other, the oldest one is in all likelihood, but not necessarily, the one nearest the original.
Restoration of documents (step 5) Match
Once the copy nearest the original is determined, match and compare these “father” copies. These will usually result to finding words/passages found in some but not in others. Again, there is a need to scrutinize if these those words and passages are additions or omissions.
Restoration of documents (step 6) Prepare
Prepare the most accurate available wordings of the passages that were added or omitted.
Restoration of documents (step 7) Check
Watch out for anachronisms changes in handwritings, and opinions or errors because if they deviate from those of original author, they most likely indicate additions by a later hand. When the style and content of the passages are associated with the original author, it is safe to assume that they were actually parts of his original manuscripts but were omitted later on by other copyists.
Restoration of documents (step 7) Check (2)
Conversely, when they cannot be attributed to the author, it is safe to assume that they were not parts of his original manuscript after all. In some cases, a final decision has to await the discovery of still more copies. In many instances the original text can be appropriately or entirely restored.
Problem of credibility; content
Is the historical evidence/source/data accurate?
What is his agenda?
Problem of credibility; author / witness
Was the writer or creator competent, honest, and unbiased?
Was he willing or able to tell the truth?
Does the witness agree with other witnesses?
Problem of credibility; context
How long after the event happened until it was reported?
What are the circumstances that led to its production
versimilitude rather than objective truth
A particular is called CREDIBLE not because it is actually what happened, but that what actually happened as we can learn from a critical examination of the be resources.
ability to tell the truth; witness’s nearness to the event
distance and time
ability to tell the truth; witness’s competence
expertness, age, education, memory, physical and mental health, narrative skills
ability to tell the truth; degree of attention
the witness saw the event clearly
ability to tell the truth; danger of the leading question
hypothetical and loaded q /a
ability to tell the truth; circular argument
attributing unsigned writings to a supposed author
ability to tell the truth; egocentrism
what is essential to the witness/ how the witness knows it
Willingness to the truth, untruthfulness; caution against the witness
truth distortion benefits the witness
Willingness to the truth, untruthfulness; bias
perversion of the truth is subtle and may not be realized by the witness
Willingness to the truth, untruthfulness; desire to please and displease others
may lead to avoidance of the truth
Willingness to the truth, untruthfulness; laws and convention
sometimes obliges witness to depart from strict verdict
Willingness to the truth, documents
inexact dating of historical docs
Ability to the tell the truth, conditions favoring credibility; implication of the statement testimony
Testimony is likely to be unbiased if the implication of the statement is irrelevant to the witness.
Ability to the tell the truth, conditions favoring credibility; detrimental effect of statement or his cause
If the statement is harmful to the witness, his loved ones, the statement is likely to be truthful. (Note: Hence, confessions, if not forcibly extracted and given by a person with sound mental health, are considered valuable testimonies.)
Ability to the tell the truth, conditions favoring credibility; matters of common knowledge
Witness is not likely to be mistaken or tell lies when describing about matters of common knowledge or well- known facts.
Ability to the tell the truth, conditions favoring credibility; incidental and probable statements
in cases wherein the fact in question may not be well-known, certain kinds of statements are both incidental and probable to such an extent that error or falsehood seems improbable.
Ability to the tell the truth, conditions favoring credibility; testimony contrary to one’s belief
if the personal beliefs, convictions and thought patterns of the witness are publicly known and yet he declares contrary statements, it is likely that his statements are credible.
historical fact
particular derived directly or indirectly from historical documents and regarded as credible after testing in accordance with the canons of historical method.
historical subjects has these aspects
biographical, geographical, chronological and occupational/functional
historical subjects are subjected to
Even the most genuine of documents should be regarded as guilty of deceit until proven innocent.
For each particular of a document the process of establishing of credibility
should be separately undertaken regardless of the general credibility of the author.
Although a primary particular which has been extracted from the documents after undergoing internal and external criticism may be presumed to be trustworthy,
such particular may only be considered as historical fact only after obtaining corroboration among witnesses.
Igorot are from the
clustered in the northern part of the country
Lumads are localized in
southern part of the Philippines
Ethnic groups belonging under the lumads
Blaan, Bukidnon, Higaonon, Mamanwa, Mandaya, Manobo, Mansaka, Sangir, Subanen, Tagabawa, Tagakaulo, Tasaday, and T’boli.
Ethnic groups belonging under the Igorot
The Ifugao, the Ilongot, Isnag, Gaddang as well as the groups known as the Bontoc, Ibaloi, Isneg, Kalinga, Kankaaey and Tinguian
R.A 8371
“The Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act”
Historical negationism
is a form of historical revisionism which seeks to deny the reality of the historical event in question and usually runs contrary to society’s collective memory.
Concepts significant understanding the method of historical analysis.
Interpretation and multiperspectivity
Interpretations
vary according to who, when and how the primary sources are read;
Many of the things previously accepted as “true” may not be the case today
Multiperspectivity
recognizes that there are different ways of viewing and evaluating history.
Essence of multiperspectivity
By relying on a singular viewpoint, there is a risk of allowing no space for inquiry and
investigation.
Proclamation of independen ce
June 12, 1898
first adviser to the late President Emilio Aguinaldo, authored Proclamation of Philippine Independence
Ambrosio Rianzares Bautista y Altamira
movements Ambrosio Rianzares Bautista y Altamira was part of
La Liga Filipina
Cuerpo de Compromisarios
La Propaganda
Ambrosio Rianzares Bautista y Altamira graduated in
graduated from UST in 1865 (law)
The declaration of independence was written
originally written in Spanish translated in English
relatively long due to narration of notable events
noted precise dates and important people
presence of biased approach and claims
narrative writing use to write the proclamation of independence
tragedies and events ( polo y servicio, abuses and overall effects of colonization)
geographical
kawit, etivac
The proclamation of independence was written (primary source)
in Spanish (translated to English)
antonio pigafetta is known as
The chronicler of the voyage
Antonio Pigafetta’s books
Relazione del priomo viaggio intorno al mondo
II primo viaggio intronon al globo di Antonio Pigafetta e le sue regole sull’arte del navigare
Who accompanied Magellan to the Spanish Islands
Antonio Pigafetta
The expedition started and ended
1519 and ended in Spain in 1522
The book/novel was written
on board one of the 5 ships: Victoria this ship was able
to return to Spain.
Who created publications about the Cavite Mutiny
Fr .John N. Schumacher SJ
Recognition received by Fr .John N. Schumacher SJ
Ateneo de Manila University Gawad Tanglaw ng Lahi on the centenary of Philippine independence.
When did the Cavite Mutiny happened
January 20, 1872,at Fort San Felipe in Cavite
Reason behind the Cavite Mutiny
Rooted in protest by Spanish and Filipino military
personnel against discrimination and abuse