POM - lecture 7 - interest groups (Ch6 in old book, Ch4 in new book)

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/20

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

21 Terms

1
New cards

insider versus outsiders, section versus cause is important! exam wil focus on this 

2
New cards

interest groups 

  • interest groups are voluntary 

  • neither politicians nor civil servants operate in an isolated world 

  • policy makers often consult / are consulted by groups outside government for information and support, some are called interest groups 

  • … 

  • examples interest groups; greenpeace (cause group), nurses unions (sectional group), patient organizations (cause group, because not only patients also family of patients), amnesty international

  • doktors without borders provide services and do not really influence policies so they are not a interest groups. 

3
New cards

phases of policy making

  • this often is represented as a circle

  • interest groups have power in;

    • agenda setting → ideas, innovation, research

    • sometimes present at the table, policy formulation and policy implementation → advocacy, lobbying.

    • interest groups can also implement, monitor or control policies (baby food, bfpn)

4
New cards

ideas of interest groups

  • in pluralist societies interest groups may be important brake on executive power → or driver

  • try to bend public policy towards their own (narrow) interests → less inclined to think of the complex set of trade-ofs

  • in industrialized countries there has been huge growth in interest groups → overcrowded policy environment

  • few interest groups in LMIC → citizens show discontent through non compliance , evasion or disengagement → through huge increase in NGOs, often primarily function in service delivery, but advocacy is often part of their activities

5
New cards

three key interests

  • professional monopolists 

    • want professionals autonomy and quality 

    • doctors union 

  • corporate rationalizers 

    • focus on the market, management and efficiency. making profit. 

  • equal community health advocates 

    • the people and equity 

    • NGOs 

6
New cards

focus on NGOs, civil society and interest groups

  • civil society → space between the state and the market and the houshold 

  • interest groups → 

  • NGOs → formal bodies, active in civil society, some want to influence policy (but not all) 

7
New cards

NGOs in LMIC

  • civil society in most L and MIC is relatively weak 

  • in these contexts, NGOs (including those funded by donors or foreign governments) often take on role of interest groups, at times exerting considerable influence (colonial) 

  • external and accounted for 29% of total health spending in low income countries in 2020 

  • historically NGOs in the health sector functions as apolitical providers of welfare and relief foe the poor and were predominantly established, staffed and run by expatriates → provide health to all

  • many NGOs have shifted from a primarily ‘ doing’ roles to a more influencing role in policy and governance. 

8
New cards
  • 1st generation of NGOs

    • red cross

    • relief, humanitarian are 

    • based on capital investment

  • 2nd generation NGOs

    • 1970s acknowledgement of limitqtions of relief and increasing dependency 

    • shifted to self reliance → small scale projects, farming, preventative medicine 

  • 3rd generation NGOs

    • mid 1980s they noticed that small scale projects had bery limited impact 

    • system NGOs → focus on sustainable change,m including policy making

  • 4rth generation NGOs

    • fostering networks to contribute to 3rd generation 

  • 5th generation (DIRK thinks( 

    • ad hoc, not formal, lose movements

9
New cards

BRAC

  • NGO in Bangladesh

    • was set up as parallel service to the governemnt, provide health services

    • currently part of the government 

    • primarily service delivary 

10
New cards

MCNV

  • medical committee netherlands vietnam

  • facillitator 

  • to improve health and wellbeing of the people in vietnam (and laos) especially of the most vulnerable groups 

  • tuberculosis programme 

11
New cards

TAG

  • treatment action group 

  • whose activism and innovation turned AIDS from a death sentence into a managable condition. these activists infiltrated the pharmaceutical industry and helped indentify promising new drugs, moving them from experimental trials to patients in record time. 

  • made antiretrovirals available at lower cost

  • also changed ethics in health research 

12
New cards

How NGOs influence policy 

  • NGOs are often dynamic innovative organisations that develop new views and experiment with new working methods 

  • NGOs are effecrive in reaching grass roots (communities) 

  • may be approached by government for advice or to work togehter 

  • or inspire in other ways 

  • but NGOs may also actively lobby 

  • and from networks (with other NGOs) 

  • NGOs often link up with international organization (WHO) 

  • sometimes NGOs may organize mass protest as means of advocacy 

  • there are drawbacks 

Combination of activities that is successful for big changes!!! (proof of principle, something works) 

13
New cards

functions of interest groups

  • participation, alternative (direct) way for voters 

    • students participate in university policy making

  • representation → widens range of options and widens range of values 

  • motivation → drivers, bring in ew issues, more information, new views, new policy options 

  • mobilization → build pressure for action 

  • monitoring → assessing performance of government and private corporations 

  • political education 

  • provision → deliver services, innovations 

    • possibly as public contractors

14
New cards

types of interest groups

  • sectional versus cause groups 

    • sectional → 

    • cause 

  • insider verus outsider 

    • based on regonition by government 

15
New cards

sectional groups

  • protect interests of their membership and political pressure is a secondary aim (only when necessary) 

    • stand for producer interest

  • often relatively strong and can have power (trade unions) 

    • strikes, evasion, new ideas, monitoring 

  • in health sector, medical professioonals were in dmninat positions with considerable control over training and regulation of their own members 

  • changed in the 80s, medical professionals (doctors) moved from privileged position to less centre stage 

  • in many countries still very powerful actors. 

16
New cards

cause groups

  • are there to change, have a goal (greenpeace)

  • exist primarlily to pressurize on particular issues

    • value driven

    • stand for consumer interest

    • social movement

  • draw their membership from a wide range of people within society

  • for example environmental groups, human rights groups

    • can be sponsored by producers / industry

17
New cards

insider groups

  • can sit at the table 

  • accepted and respected by governemnt policy makers → perceived legitimate 

  • government may turn to such groups for information or to test ideas for policy changes

  • may be incited to join particular goverment comittees 

  • may be deeply involved in decision making 

  • often subtle lobbying 

18
New cards

outsider groups

  • not perceived as legitimate by government policy 

  • difficulty in penetrating policy process

  • may resort to direct action trying to get media coverage and to mobilize public opinion 

  • may try to persuade individual politicians to take up their cause in legislature 

  • outsider groups may become insider groups particularly when delivering services seen as relevant by government 

19
New cards

professional lobbyists

  • lobby is the part of advocacy that focusres on legislation

20
New cards

disecourse community versus interest network

21
New cards

drawbacks of interest groups

  • legitimacy → democracy of representation of numbers / values

  • difficulty in reconciling conflicting claims

  • time consuming to reach decisions

  • some groups may be marginalized

  • dominant groups can use multiple channels

  • who finances interest groups

  • some interest groups can be self interested, badly informed, misleading, intimidating etc.

  • difficult to determine level of representation.