1/20
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
insider versus outsiders, section versus cause is important! exam wil focus on this
interest groups
interest groups are voluntary
neither politicians nor civil servants operate in an isolated world
policy makers often consult / are consulted by groups outside government for information and support, some are called interest groups
…
examples interest groups; greenpeace (cause group), nurses unions (sectional group), patient organizations (cause group, because not only patients also family of patients), amnesty international
doktors without borders provide services and do not really influence policies so they are not a interest groups.
phases of policy making
this often is represented as a circle
interest groups have power in;
agenda setting → ideas, innovation, research
sometimes present at the table, policy formulation and policy implementation → advocacy, lobbying.
interest groups can also implement, monitor or control policies (baby food, bfpn)
ideas of interest groups
in pluralist societies interest groups may be important brake on executive power → or driver
try to bend public policy towards their own (narrow) interests → less inclined to think of the complex set of trade-ofs
in industrialized countries there has been huge growth in interest groups → overcrowded policy environment
few interest groups in LMIC → citizens show discontent through non compliance , evasion or disengagement → through huge increase in NGOs, often primarily function in service delivery, but advocacy is often part of their activities
three key interests
professional monopolists
want professionals autonomy and quality
doctors union
corporate rationalizers
focus on the market, management and efficiency. making profit.
equal community health advocates
the people and equity
NGOs
focus on NGOs, civil society and interest groups
civil society → space between the state and the market and the houshold
interest groups →
NGOs → formal bodies, active in civil society, some want to influence policy (but not all)
NGOs in LMIC
civil society in most L and MIC is relatively weak
in these contexts, NGOs (including those funded by donors or foreign governments) often take on role of interest groups, at times exerting considerable influence (colonial)
external and accounted for 29% of total health spending in low income countries in 2020
historically NGOs in the health sector functions as apolitical providers of welfare and relief foe the poor and were predominantly established, staffed and run by expatriates → provide health to all
many NGOs have shifted from a primarily ‘ doing’ roles to a more influencing role in policy and governance.
1st generation of NGOs
red cross
relief, humanitarian are
based on capital investment
2nd generation NGOs
1970s acknowledgement of limitqtions of relief and increasing dependency
shifted to self reliance → small scale projects, farming, preventative medicine
3rd generation NGOs
mid 1980s they noticed that small scale projects had bery limited impact
system NGOs → focus on sustainable change,m including policy making
4rth generation NGOs
fostering networks to contribute to 3rd generation
5th generation (DIRK thinks(
ad hoc, not formal, lose movements
BRAC
NGO in Bangladesh
was set up as parallel service to the governemnt, provide health services
currently part of the government
primarily service delivary
MCNV
medical committee netherlands vietnam
facillitator
to improve health and wellbeing of the people in vietnam (and laos) especially of the most vulnerable groups
tuberculosis programme
TAG
treatment action group
whose activism and innovation turned AIDS from a death sentence into a managable condition. these activists infiltrated the pharmaceutical industry and helped indentify promising new drugs, moving them from experimental trials to patients in record time.
made antiretrovirals available at lower cost
also changed ethics in health research
How NGOs influence policy
NGOs are often dynamic innovative organisations that develop new views and experiment with new working methods
NGOs are effecrive in reaching grass roots (communities)
may be approached by government for advice or to work togehter
or inspire in other ways
but NGOs may also actively lobby
and from networks (with other NGOs)
NGOs often link up with international organization (WHO)
sometimes NGOs may organize mass protest as means of advocacy
there are drawbacks
Combination of activities that is successful for big changes!!! (proof of principle, something works)
functions of interest groups
participation, alternative (direct) way for voters
students participate in university policy making
representation → widens range of options and widens range of values
motivation → drivers, bring in ew issues, more information, new views, new policy options
mobilization → build pressure for action
monitoring → assessing performance of government and private corporations
political education
provision → deliver services, innovations
possibly as public contractors
types of interest groups
sectional versus cause groups
sectional →
cause
insider verus outsider
based on regonition by government
sectional groups
protect interests of their membership and political pressure is a secondary aim (only when necessary)
stand for producer interest
often relatively strong and can have power (trade unions)
strikes, evasion, new ideas, monitoring
in health sector, medical professioonals were in dmninat positions with considerable control over training and regulation of their own members
changed in the 80s, medical professionals (doctors) moved from privileged position to less centre stage
in many countries still very powerful actors.
cause groups
are there to change, have a goal (greenpeace)
exist primarlily to pressurize on particular issues
value driven
stand for consumer interest
social movement
draw their membership from a wide range of people within society
for example environmental groups, human rights groups
can be sponsored by producers / industry
insider groups
can sit at the table
accepted and respected by governemnt policy makers → perceived legitimate
government may turn to such groups for information or to test ideas for policy changes
may be incited to join particular goverment comittees
may be deeply involved in decision making
often subtle lobbying
outsider groups
not perceived as legitimate by government policy
difficulty in penetrating policy process
may resort to direct action trying to get media coverage and to mobilize public opinion
may try to persuade individual politicians to take up their cause in legislature
outsider groups may become insider groups particularly when delivering services seen as relevant by government
professional lobbyists
lobby is the part of advocacy that focusres on legislation
disecourse community versus interest network
drawbacks of interest groups
legitimacy → democracy of representation of numbers / values
difficulty in reconciling conflicting claims
time consuming to reach decisions
some groups may be marginalized
dominant groups can use multiple channels
who finances interest groups
some interest groups can be self interested, badly informed, misleading, intimidating etc.
difficult to determine level of representation.