Reflexive Behavior and Respondent Behavior (ch. 3)

studied byStudied by 62 People
0.0(0)
get a hint
hint

Phylogenetic Behavior

1/63

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.

Studying Progress

New cards
63
Still learning
0
Almost done
0
Mastered
0
63 Terms
New cards

Phylogenetic Behavior

Related to genetic endowment & evolutionary history (ex. reflexes)

New cards
New cards

Fixed Action Patterns (FAP)

(type of phylogenetic behavior): predictable & sterotyped behaviors that are innate & immutable

New cards
New cards

Modal Action Patterns (MAP)

(type of phylogenetic behavior):

  • updated term for FAP

  • does NOT account for variation within & across species

  • implies flexibility rather rigid genetic control

New cards
New cards

Unconditioned Reflexes

An unconditioned stimulus (US) elicits an unconditioned response (UR) & occurs w/o prior learning (ex. jumping to a loud noise)

New cards
New cards

Threshold

Certain level must be passed for a reflec to happen

New cards
New cards

Intensity / Magnitude

As intensity of the US increases, so does the magnitude of the UR

New cards
New cards

Latency

As intensity of the US increases, the latency to the UR decreases

New cards
New cards

Habituation

Decrease in an UR following rapid repeated exposure to an US (ex. gets startled at the first 3 thunder sounds, but 4th thunder, no startle response)

New cards
New cards

Ontogenetic Behavior

behavior learned by experience during a lifetime (ex. rooting reflex in newborns)

New cards
New cards

Respondent Conditioning

  1. previously neutral stimulus (NS) is paired

  2. w/ an unconditioned stimulus (US)

  3. result NS becoming a conditioned stimulus (CS)

  4. that elicits a conditioned response (CR = are learned & ontogenetic origin)

<ol><li><p>previously neutral stimulus (NS) is paired</p></li><li><p>w/ an unconditioned stimulus (US)</p></li><li><p>result NS becoming a conditioned stimulus (CS)</p></li><li><p>that elicits a conditioned response (CR = are learned &amp; ontogenetic origin)</p></li></ol>
New cards
New cards

What makes a stimulus (CS & US) more effective?

  • a more intense stimulus

  • ex. hard dog bite vs. nip

New cards
New cards

What makes a conditioning stronger?

more pairings with stimulus during respondent acquisition

New cards
New cards

What makes a conditioning weaker?

  • prior exposure to neutral stimulus (NS) before pairing

  • ex. multiple exposures to a dog before being bitten

New cards
New cards

The more regularly the US follows the CS...

... the stronger the conditioning

New cards
New cards

Higher-order Conditioning

  1. neutral stimulus (NS) is paired

  2. w/ an already-established conditioned stimulus (CS₁)

  3. resulting in the NS becoming a conditioned stimulus (CS₂)

  4. that elicits the conditioned response (CR)

<ol><li><p>neutral stimulus (NS) is paired</p></li><li><p>w/ an already-established conditioned stimulus (CS₁)</p></li><li><p>resulting in the NS becoming a conditioned stimulus (CS₂)</p></li><li><p>that elicits the conditioned response (CR)</p></li></ol>
New cards
New cards

Respondent Extinction

Repeated presentation of the CS w/o presenting the US therefore CS eventually no longer elicits the CR

New cards
New cards

Spontaneous Recovery

The CS elicits the CR AFTER extinction & disappears if US not presented

New cards
New cards

Drug Overdose (example)

body becomes conditioned to drug dosage in a single location

New cards
New cards

Weight Gain (example)

in the presence of sugar (US) your body begins to break down sugar (UR)

New cards
New cards

Phobias / Anxiety

fear is composed of respondent & operant behavior

<p>fear is composed of respondent &amp; operant behavior</p>
New cards
New cards

Respondent Behavior to Phobias

automonic arousal responses:

  • rapid heart rate

  • increased muscle tension

  • rapid breathing

  • sweating

New cards
New cards

Operant Behavior to Phobias

escape or avoidance from anxiety-provoking stimuli (ex. person w/ phobia of dogs avoid dogs)

New cards
New cards

Behavioral Intervention for Phobias

combination of:

  • counterconditioning

  • respondent extinction

  • habituation

New cards
New cards

Counterconditioning

condition fear-eliciting stimuli to produce responses opposite of autonomic arousal

New cards
New cards

Graduated Exposure / Systematic Desensitization

gradual exposure to a hiearchy of fear-provoking stimuli which practices relaxation in the presence of it thus resulting in respondent extinction (ex. exposed to dog multiple times to cease the same fear response)

New cards
New cards

Flooding

client is exposed to the feared stimulus at full intesnity until fear subsides resulting in respondent extincition

New cards
New cards

Associative strength

  • the relation between the CS and the magnitude of the CR

  • increases over conditioning trials & reaches some max. level

New cards
New cards

Rescorla–Wagner model

Model of respondent conditioning is that a conditioned stimulus (CS) acquires the limited amount of associative strength on any one trial

<p>Model of respondent conditioning is that a conditioned stimulus (CS) acquires the limited amount of associative strength on any one trial</p>
New cards
New cards

Backward Conditioning

The US comes on & goes off before the CS comes on (US followed by CS) but is unreliable (ex. place food in a dog's mouth & ring a bell, but bell does not produce a conditioned response)

<p>The US comes on &amp; goes off before the CS comes on (US followed by CS) but is unreliable (ex. place food in a dog&apos;s mouth &amp; ring a bell, but bell does not produce a conditioned response)</p>
New cards
New cards

Blocking

a previously-learned thought process prevents or delays the learning and conditioning of new behavior

New cards
New cards

Blocking (Example)

if a dog is repeatedly exposed to a tone (the first conditioned stimulus, CS1), together with food (the unconditioned stimulus, US), the dog salivates when the tone is presented (conditioned response, CR)

New cards
New cards

Compound Stimuli

a stimulus comprising two or more simple stimuli that occur at the same time.

New cards
New cards

Overshadowing

A decrease in conditioning with one conditioned stimulus because of the presence of another conditioned stimulus

New cards
New cards

Respondent Acquisition

The increase in the conditioned response (CR) to the presentation of the conditioned stimulus (CS)

New cards
New cards

Respondent discrimination

The ability to distinguish between one stimulus and similar stimuli

New cards
New cards

Respondent discrimination (example)

Being able to tell the difference between the bell tone and other similar sounds

New cards
New cards

Simultaneous conditioning

Temporal arrangement where the CS & US are presented at the same time but produces a weaker conditioned response

<p>Temporal arrangement where the CS &amp; US are presented at the same time but produces a weaker conditioned response</p>
New cards
New cards

Delayed conditioning

Temporal arrangement where the CS precedes the US briefly

<p>Temporal arrangement where the CS precedes the US briefly</p>
New cards
New cards

Trace conditioning

Temporal arrangement where the CS is presented for a brief period, on & off, and after some time the US occurs (comes from idea of "memory trace")

<p>Temporal arrangement where the CS is presented for a brief period, on &amp; off, and after some time the US occurs (comes from idea of &quot;memory trace&quot;)</p>
New cards
New cards

Conditioned response (CR)

the learned response to the previosly neutral stimulus

New cards
New cards

Conditioned stimulus (CS)

a substitute stimulus that triggers the same response in an organism as an unconditioned stimulus

New cards
New cards

Conditioned suppression

A procedure that leads to a decrease in operant behavior while the conditioned aversive is present (ex. a rat may be trained to press a lever to receive food)

New cards
New cards

Conditioned Taste Aversion (CTA)

A learned association of taste and visceral distress

New cards
New cards

Conditioned Taste Aversion (CTA) (Example)

If you ate sushi for lunch and then became ill, you might avoid eating sushi in the future, even if it had no relationship to your illness

New cards
New cards

Conditioned Place Preference (CPP)

When a subject comes to prefer one place more than others because the preferred location has been paired previously with rewarding events

New cards
New cards

Conditioned Place Preference (Example)

In trials testing drugs of abuse, if the animal experiences the initial pleasurable effects of the drug while in the conditioning context, the result will likely be conditioned place preference.

New cards
New cards

First-order conditioning (respondent conditioning)

Association is formed between a conditioned stimulus (CS) and an unconditioned stimulus (US) that are directly paired together

<p>Association is formed between a conditioned stimulus (CS) and an unconditioned stimulus (US) that are directly paired together</p>
New cards
New cards

Generalization gradient (respondent)

Occurs when an organism shows a conditioned response (CR) to values of the conditioned stimulus (CS) that were not trained during acquisition. It's the function (graph) that relates values of the CS (loudness of tone) to a measure of response strength (amount of CR)

<p>Occurs when an organism shows a conditioned response (CR) to values of the conditioned stimulus (CS) that were not trained during acquisition. It&apos;s the function (graph) that relates values of the CS (loudness of tone) to a measure of response strength (amount of CR)</p>
New cards
New cards

Latent inhibition

The animal’s learning of the CS–US relation is reduced or inhibited by pre-exposure of the CS, revealed by an acquisition test following the conditioning phase.

New cards
New cards

Law of intensity–magnitude

As the intensity of an unconditioned stimulus (US) increases, so does the magnitude or size of the unconditioned response (UR)

New cards
New cards

Law of latency

As the intensity of the unconditioned stimulus (US) increases, the latency (time to onset) of the unconditioned response (UR) decreases.

New cards
New cards

Law of the threshold

the lowest point at which a particular stimulus will cause a response in an organism

New cards
New cards

Primary laws of the reflex

  1. the law of the threshold

  2. the law of intensity–magnitude, and

  3. the law of the latency These laws govern the US → UR relationship.

New cards
New cards

Salience (S)

The (S) of various CSs, the current strength of the US (A), the strength of the association between the various CS and the US (V) and the total learned association between all of the present CS and the US (V sum).

New cards
New cards

Tolerance (to a drug)

When more of a drug (US) is needed to obtain the same drug effects (UR)

New cards
New cards

Unconditioned Stimulus & Response (US & UR)

All organisms are born with a set of reflexes (US → UR)

New cards
New cards

US-pre-exposure effect

A procedure where animals are first given repeated exposures to the US by itself and then a series of CS → US pairings (conditioning). Compared to animals given pairings with a novel US, those familiar with the US (pre-exposed) show weaker and slower conditioning on the acquisition test.

New cards
New cards

phylogenetic and ontogenetic selection

Ontogeny refers to the development of an organism while phylogeny refers to how the organisms have evolved.

New cards
New cards

ontogenetic behaviors

The elaboration and perfection of behavior as an individual grows up (Ex. children's tendencies to overestimate their abilities.)

New cards
New cards

Respondent generalization

When an organism shows a conditioned response to values of the CS that weren't trained during acquistion

New cards
New cards

Respondent Generalization (Example)

If a student learns how to zip up their jacket and then is able to zip up their backpack, then the skill of using a zipper has been generalized

New cards
New cards

Relaxation Training

Often is used in conjunction with systematic desensitization, a procedure designed to lower fear or anxiety toward a specific stimulus (or stimuli) by pairing the feared stimulus or thoughts of the feared stimulus with relaxation.

New cards
New cards

Spontaneous Recovery (Example)

A trainer teaches a dog to sit by associating the command “Sit” with food. So the dog learns to sit whenever the trainer says the word. But after the trainer stops giving it food, the dog gradually stops responding to the command. Days later, the trainer tries again, and the dog sits again.

New cards