1/36
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
What can you offer as atonement for a mistake?
Acknowledge that nothing can make this right
Offering counseling services is a big one
Some kind of monetary compensation
Take accountability
Level of courtroom testimony
The ability to communicate facts at an 8th grade level
Being able to communicate effectively shows you care, which shows that you care about finding the truth. It shows a jury you can be trusted and are relatable
What to do when you’re having a bad day in the lab
If you’re having a bad time, and you still need to go to work, tell your supervisor, and occasionally have someone go over your work- “To thine unself be true” -Shakespeare
“The Golden Hour”
step back from something you are dreading or doing and check in with yourself to re-center yourself
Block out distractions, get yourself mentally and physically prepared
You can’t turn it off, but you can evaluate your capabilities at that moment
Types of bias
Confirmational and contextual
Contextual bias
Best mitigated by sequential unmasking
Putting fingerprints into AFIS (now NGI), the system will spit back samples and ID numbers (NOT names)
Blind identification/verification (identifying something without the context of the first identification)
Based on context
If an examiner receives evidence from a crime scene and then samples from a suspect, the focus is directed toward that suspect
Obligations to the professions
Maintain professional skills and keep up to date with current information
Professional testing, attending conferences, reading journals, continuing education (though often come with a fee that the state can’t always pay for)
Code of ethics
You want the same rules for all people under the umbrella of the career
Exist to create a baseline
“There are rules for a reason” -ie there is a REASON why that rule is around
Seven deadly sins
Pride, gluttony, envy, wrath, lust, sloth, greed
Cardinal virtues
Prudence, justice, fortitude, temperance, faith, hope, and charity
Rules for accepting a gift
By law, anything offered to us valued over $100 has to be
1) Returned with a vigorous thank you
2) Shared with everyone in the office
3) If it is accepted, you have to donate the equivalent value to a charity in that person’s (the giver) name
There are legal forms for this
The safest bet is to decline- but if it’s food, share it if you can, that’s hard to return
How do we enforce ethical standards
Learn from systems where things work and where things are done
Reasonable and responsive ideals
Principles
Accept ethical norms
Enumerated and published codes of conduct
Reach out to the people who know the positions and the lab in the creation of a list of ethics
Position of consensus among managers and people higher than them
Cyclical and continuing education to ensure updates are not only known but understood and cover all aspects of the code
Availability to all practitioners and all other interested parties
You have to know the rules and be able to produce them to enforce them
Documented acceptance of the code and acknowledgment that it has been read and understood
If you join a professional organization, you have to read their code of ethics and sign to prove you understand them
How do we overcome temptation
Self-discipline
Know yourself best, and first, know what you are tempted by
Admit to yourself what your traits are- good and bad
Know what things you place at a high value, as these things can be used against you to move you off your ethical square
Accountability
DISC survey
Dominance, influence, steadiness, and compliance test (DISC survey)
Identifies individual styles, strengths, and weaknesses
Created by the FBI
Used to help you grow, show areas you need to work on
Help you in professional and personal relations and situations
Performance =
Procedure
Character =
Action
What can emotions do?
Emotions can control, or they can control you
Cravings divert ethical behavior
Impact bias
Overwhelming, magnifies the effect of cravings, craving overvalues potential outcome, clouds judgment
We tend to overinflate and extend the impact of good outcomes
Focalism
The tendency to place too much importance or emphasis on a single factor or piece of information when making judgments or decisions
Hyperfocusing on one piece of evidence as a lead and ignoring others
Focusing on one piece of evidence might you lock in on someone and overlook something very important
Tunnel vision
Where do operational standards fail?
Standards of practice cannot fit every single situation case or investigation technique
And yet investigators try to apply them to every situation- which might not always lead to the most ethical outcomes
Ensuring ethical standards
Background investigations
Ethical training- situational training
Mental health
Inebriated persons
Ethical choices of an individual tend to echo the attitudes of an organization
Brady material
Material information that is exculpatory or may impeach a witness and, therefore has a bearing on the guilt or innocence of a defendant
Therefore, prior unethical conduct of an individual (expert witness or forensic practitioner) or agency by which they are employed can be considered Brady material
It can preclude evidence associated with that behavior from being admissible
Goes back to maintaining your credibility
Front page/newspaper test
Whenever you’re faced with a difficult situation- think about how it would look on the front page of the newspaper
How to regain public trust
Take accountability
Publicize what you are doing to fix things
Separate yourself from the bad act/bad actor
Demming’s 14 Points of Maximizing Enterprise
1) Create a constant purpose for improvement
2) Adopt the new philosophy
3) Stop depending on inspections
4) Use a single supplier for any one item
5) Improve constantly and forever
6) Use training on the job
7) Implement leadership
8) Eliminate fear
9) Break down barriers between departments
10) Get rid of unclear slogans
11) Eliminate management by objective
12) Implement education in self-improvement
13) Make transformation everybody’s job
Methods used to prevent ethical dillemmas and problems
Revisit policies and procedures
More training
On the investigation side
Maintaining/rebuilding integrity
People in charge of QA, but then also outside entities looking into cases in the lab (innocence project, etc)
Things being public record
FOIA request
Request for public record information, including case files that can be accessed by anyone with the request
Critical step in evaluating veracity of claims
Inherent bias in accepting the first impression (prima facia)- accepting the report on face value
Crime rate statistics effect
Crime rate stats should not be discussed in the lab- you’re working on cases as fast as you can and if someone shows that crime rates are going up, you will be quicker to assume that someone is guilty
The number of open and unsolved cases
Pressure from the attorneys, officers, etc. to finish cases
Community involvement in forensics
Riots happening because of misconduct
Public has the ability to reach out to investigators
It’s the public right to have that number, but a supervisors job to shield investigators from that kind of pressure
Until the case is completely adjudicated, the investigator can’t legally give you any information about the case anyway- the case belongs to the attorney’s office
Good relation with the attorney’s office is important for this reason
Internal investigation units
COPA
Citizens office for police accountability- every time a Chicago police officer fires a gun, they have to investigate if it was necessary
NRE
National registry for exonerations- part of science departments for many university, founded in 2012 at Northwestern
Provides info on every exoneration since 1989- why they were exonerated, whether misconduct was present
EJI
Equal justice initiative- committed to ending mass incarceration to challenge racial and economic injustice and protect equal rights for the underrepresented persons
What does presence of internal investigation units show?
Presence of these organizations show that we need some help, we have some bad actors, and the effects of poor choices are being felt widely
How do we remedy misconduct and false convictions?
Ethics training is one thing, but it doesn’t seem to prevent bad actors
Vetting people and giving in depth interviews
Situational training
Including training on what to do if they do something they should not have, mistake or otherwise
Introduce mock cases in with regular case work to test if you are doing a good job, following procedure, etc
Everyone has to be skilled writers
Being able to take thorough and copious notes
MCR
Major case review
Preform triage on evidence and weighing importance on what will be the most probative
Forensic scientists from each discipline will meet along with the detectives and the states attorney and go through the manifest of evidence to determine what needs to be analyzed first and by who
Open phone policy
Officers can call people in the lab and ask questions about what they should bring in (like should I bring this knife in that I found in the bedroom?)
Ask follow-up questions: Are there towels around? Is there blood in the bathroom? Can you use a UV light to look for blood around?
It’s good to ask questions about where evidence comes from- it’s important context
Rules for keeping evidence safe
LIMS system
not everyone needs access to the evidence (often given by keycard)
Record of who/what has happened to the evidence
Note that some analysis technology uses up the evidence (you may need a PTC permission to consume order)
These orders are important because if the case is appealed, there’s generally secondary analysis- which cannot happen if the evidence was fully consumed
Record even if nothing happened with the evidence and why
Think about the Houston lab where the evidence was destroyed- leaks/rodents would be why nothing happened with it
Record conversations abt the case
Like with the state’s attorney
Record if evidence may need to come back to the lab
Record what instrumentation is used on evidence
Also is it working properly
Record chemicals used
Include expiration date
Third person personalization
A type of bias in which you believe your own lie
such as when people lie on a resume