1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Marbury v. Madison
established the principle of judicial review. This allowed the Supreme Court to decide the constitutionality of actions.
McCulloch v. Maryland
in a dispute between state and federal authority, this case ruled that the Federal government had supremacy over states, when dealing with FEDERAL issues. State issues though, within the state, remained under the authority of the state.
Schenck v. United States
1st amendment rights are not absolute, in the event that language creates a clear and present danger to the welfare of the public
Brown v. Board of Education
ended the practice of legal segregation in public education. Civil rights
Baker v. Carr
gerrymandering is legal and can be influenced by a variety of factors, including race
Ok with race
Engel v. Vitale
establishment clause, prayer in public school is illegal. Cannot force a religion on citizens in the public sector.
Gideon v. Wainwright
right to an attorney
Tinker v. Des Moines
freedom of expression (students wearing armbands to protest the Vietnam War)
*** Protesting is protected, even for horrible groups, as long as they are not creating a public problem***
NY Times v. United States
issues with prior restraint. Government cannot regulate the media
Wisconsin v. Yoder
exercise clause- government cannot tell someone how or what to practice as long as it's legal
Shaw v. Reno
gerrymandering concerns and that redistricting cannot be focused solely on race.
Not ok with race
United States v. Lopez
Congress attempted to limit the 2nd amendment, after challenging the ruling, the Supreme Court ruled that the commerce clause could not be used to circumvent the Bill of Rights.
McDonald v. Chicago
an attempt to prevent citizens from owning handguns. The Supreme Court ruled that states can limit, but can’t eliminate a person’s ability to be protected by a constitutional right.
Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission
The Supreme Court ruled that corporations have the same first amendment rights as citizens and have the ability to influence elections, donating to PACs and SuperPacs the same as individual citizens.