1/166
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Benefits of membranes enabling the compartmentalisation of cells
is a functional barrier, so can separate reactions
eanbles formation of gradients across them (e.g. ATP synth, signal transduction)
Can organise and regulate enzyme activity
what parts of membranes can facilitate signal transduction
membrane bound receptors
lipids/proteins that can recruit and activate other proteins
how do membranes organise and regulate enzyme activities
they can bind enzymes, faciliating their localisation to specific compartments and membranes
purpose of phospholipase C
hydrolyses PIP2 → DAG (diacyl glycerol) and IP3.
both are second messengers. DAG remains in memb, IP3 rel into cytosol.
What signalling event activates phospholipase c
Gq-coupled GPCRs, where active Gq recruits PLC to memb, activating it.
Effect on intracellular calcium by phospholipase C activation
PLC cat PIP2 → DAG + IP3
IP3 binds IP3 receptors on ER/SR (Ca2+ channels)
cause opening and release of Ca into cytosol.
What does DAG activate
protein kinase C
Gram +ve vs Gram -ve
+ve have one cell memb
-ve have inner and outer
What lipid diversity in membranes is observed
chemical/structural diversity (type of lipid differs)
Lipid composition of individual membranes - differs between tissue, organelles, leaflets within same memb
(combo of FA chains can diff in lipids too)
what are the 3 types of lipid
glycerophospholipids
sphingolipids
sterols
what does the XX:Y nomenclature for lipids mean
XX= No of carbons in the chain
Y = no of double bonds
e.g. linoleic acid = 18:2, n-6 where n-6 is position of first double bond (count from methyl terminus (very end))
How can glycerophospholipids differ
lenght of FAs
double bond position and number
hydroxylation
cis- or trans- bonds in FA chains (cis gives 30 degree kink)
Examples of glycerophospholipids
phosphatidylethanolamine (zwitterionic)
Phosphatidylserine (anionic)
Phosphatidylcholine (zwitterionic)
phosphatidylinositol (anionic)
Cardiolipin (anionic)
why can PS and PE hydrogen bond to things
have a reactive amine group
why dont PI, PC, CL pack closely
they are large phospholipids
which organelle does the organelle-specific glycerophospholipid cardiolipin localise to
mitochrondria (inner memb) (mainly in the inner, matrix-facing, leaflet) (enzymes for its synth reside in this leaflet)
how are PIPs generated
by differential phosphorylation of the head group of PI
7 diff species
PI(4,5)P2 is most abundant in memb, PLC cat its conv to IP3 and DAG
interconversion regulated by kinases and phosphatases
Structure of sphingolipids
sphingoid base (most freq sphingosine), head group, N-acyl chain (which attaches to N of sphingoid base)
structure of sphingomyelin
sphingosine base, PC head, N acyl chain
sphingoid base vs a ceramide
ceramide is a sphingoid base with a fatty acyl chain
why are sphingolipids and cholesterol frequently found together in membranes
sphingolipids have a amide group that can interact with cholesterol OH group (H bond)
Do sphingolipids often have longer acyl chains than found in glycerophospholipids
yes
what are gangliosides a type of
glycosphingolipid - can have diff no and type of sugar bound to sphingoid base
Are glycerophospholipids, sphingolipids and sterols all phospholipids
no, only glycerophospholipids and sphingolipids are
structure of sterols
hydroxyl group and hydrocarbon tail e.g. cholesterol, (ergosterol in fungi and yeast) (sitosterol and stigmasterol in plants)
how does the presence of sterols in the membrane affect the membrane e.g. cholesterol
increases thickness & packing, reduces compressability.
Reduces the mobility of lipids and proteins in the memb.
what type of bond does cholesterol/sterols form with phospholipids in the membrane
hydrogen bonds
OH to polar head
interaction of cholesterol with sphingomyelin
has a high degree of complementarity
H bond formed between OH and SM
this ‘masks’ the OH of cholesterol
mediates the formation of lipid rafts
(both are major components of rafts)
what does lipid raft formation promote
clustering of proteins in/at the raft in the memb
how does cholesterol promote GPI-anchored protein recruitment to the raft
chol increases the order and stability of the memb, forming rafts
there is a preference for rafts due to the long/large GPI component of these proteins
Therefore clustering/interaction of these proteins is promoted.
is cholesterol essential for lipid raft formation
yes
what type of lipids have a preference for lipid rafts, important in signalling
glycosphingolipids
what is the bad type of cholesterol
low density lipoprotein (LDL)
builds up in arteries
LDL vs HDL
low protein:lipid ratio (low density of protein in their particles)
vs high protein:lipid ratio
why is HDL good cholesterol
removes cholesterol from the body to liver where it is broken down.
how does membrane lipid composition affect curvature
cylindrical lipids e.g. PC, PS form flat membranes
conical lipids form curved membs e.g. PE, PA (phosphatidic acid)
negative curvature vs positive curvature
neg - tail is widest bit (PE, PA)
pos- head is widest bit (PI)
which leaflet is PS mainly found in
inner leaflet
when on outside it signals for phagocytosis
what did the fluid mosaic model not account for
the wide variation in lipid/protein composition between membranes
but otherwise models the fluidity of membs and lateral mobility that lipids have well.
dynamic membrane domains/lipid rafts were a development of fluid mosaic model
can lipid rafts be protein-initiated or lipid mediated/assisted
both.
(e.g. actin clustering below pmemb can cause (protein) but other lipids may preferentially accumulate after this (lipid))
(e.g. GM1 form nanodomains driven by lipid-lipid interactions, they self aggregate).
why is lipid raft formation important for signalling
clustering of signalling receptors increases interaction and downstream signalling
e.g. thru cooperation, increasing rebinding probability
therefore can amplify signals
3 types of membrane proteins
peripheral
intergral
lipid anchored
peripheral vs integral memb protiens
peripheral dont span the memb like integral
peripheral associate with proteins or lipids in the membrane e.g. Ras associates with PS
how can membrane structure change to accomodate proteins
can change thickness (thicker or thinner), or the protein itself will tilt, to make sure the hydrophobic portion of the protein is not exposed to solvent.
what are the lipids around a memb protein known as
boundary or annular lipids, known as the footprint of the protein
bulk lipids = further from the protein, make up the rest of the membrane - their baviour does not change due to presence of the memb protein
what is the footprint region of a MP
unique environ of lipids around it, enriched in some, depleted in others
likely essential for function of MP
define nonannular lipids/lipid cofactors
lipids that bind region of MP within the memb e.g. pockets or between protein subunits
Req for MP function
how can molecular dynamics simulations useful for the study of MPs and membranes
can be used to predict the lipid environment of membrane proteins
see which ones interact with the MP (nonannular), and which ones form the footprint
specific lipids have preference for specific MPs
is the membrane traditionally observed in membrane protein structures
no, MPs are usually solubilised
‘reductionist’ model
why is preserving the lipid environment of MPs important for structural and fucntional studies
is a key functional part of the membrane proteins
influence structure too
as MPs evolved to be in the membrane, cannot simply just take them out.
what can solubilising MPs from the membrane cause
exposes hydrophobic regions
causes collapse/loss of integrity of the protein when removed
how is the Ryanodine receptor regulated by lipids
receptor more likely to be in open conformation when extracted at high lipid conc
how is the MscL protein regulated by lipids
it open and closes due to absence/presence of lipids in the central channel, protein conf stays relatively the same
how is the TRPY1 channel regulated by lipids
channel closed when PIP3 bound, open when it not bound. Allows Ca2+ thru
How are TRYC5 and TRPM8 regulated by lipids
lipid binds and inhibits receptor
so therefore regulates function
also seen with small molecule inhibitor Pico145
With new extraction methods, what was revealed about TRPC channels
also exists in a pentameric form in the memb, not just the tetrameric form previously seen
Therefore can see more native conformation/stoichiometry
pentameric may just be more unstable form
How may cholestrol promote dimerisation of some protiens
promotes close packing of membranes, increases bilayer thickness. Therefore MPs may change conf in response, and this conf may have greater affinity for other similar proteins
e.g. a tilted MP may be more vertical in cholestrol-rich memb, so can now interact more readily
could be why these proteins preferentially accumulate in thicker parts of membrane (e.g. rafts)
why would short TM domains of proteins promote aggregation
membrane has to distort/thin to accommodate the protein. Aggregating to similar proteins would reduce the distortion energy cost for each protein, so would be favourable
How may membrane density affect the opening and closing of channels
channels may req less energy to open if in a lower density membrane
so memb density could regulate opening
do cells actively remodel their membranes
yes
membranes differ from eachother
the same memb can differ over time e.g. diff points in the cell cycle
chemicals used to separate membrane proteins
detergents
amphipols
nanodiscs
peptidisc
SMA
how do detergents work
they mimic the lipid membrane by concealing Hphobic regions of proteins
are amphipathic, so Hphobic detergent and protien regions interact, and hphilic regions interact
allowing the MP to be solubilised from the memb
downsides of detergents
can be strong/harsh e.g. SDS (highly denaturing)
Even non-harsh ones can distort protein conf
can be costly
req a high conc of detergent to maintain micelles
(but are many options)
Some detergents more convenient for specific downstream analysis methods e.g. DPC for NMR (but they may not give the most native MP structure)
Can you get different results by using different detergents
yes, some denature more than others
Some give different stoichiometries of MPs
what are amphipols
amphipathic polymers
have high affinity for memb proteins
very good avidity (cause interaction is made up of many interactions)
benefits of amphipols
high avidity for memb proteins (many interactions formed with MP, so strong binding)
This gives it a very low Koff, so low Kd
so dont req maintain a high conc, like do with detergents
have a library of diff ones we can use
Now can be used to directly extract MPs from memb without use of detergent → more native conf
downsides of amphipols
are sensitive to Ca2+ and Mg2+ (form interactions with them instead of MP
lipid environ of MP not well maintained
benefits of nanodiscs
extract MPs whilst maintaining the native lipid environ
(traditionally tho they still ‘see’ the detergent for initial extraction, but hope they fold into nanodisc quickly)
Can dilute out detergent, therfore dont have any micelles present that could interfere with downstream analysis
Newer technologies (peptidiscs and SMA-based nanodiscs dont req detergents!)
downsides of nanodiscs
req right size disc tho (req it to fit, but too big and the MP can ‘drop out’
Disc can interfere with some analytical techniques
traditional ones req detergents so solubilise the MP from the memb, new ones (e.g. SMALPs or peptidiscs) dont req them (insert into memb and extract MP with native lipid environ)
(best case is if the protein has not ‘seen’ detergent)
time differs between extraction and entering nanodisc, so variation in how well protein is maintained in the movement
how do peptidiscs differ from nanodiscs
are short peptides that cover hPhobic regions of the protien. - self asseble around Hphobic regions - forming a stable water-sol particle
req detergents for initial extraction of MP, then add peptidisc, but can dilute out the detergent (as you can do with other methods)
are more ‘one-size-fits-all’ than nanodiscs, so are cheaper - can just add. Nanodiscs req use right size.
better for preserving
what are nanodiscs
amphipathic helices made of either membrane scaffold proteins (typically engineered from ApoA1 protein) or polymers (SMA) that encapsulates a small lipid bilayer - mimics cell memb
what is SMA
a polymer of repeating styrene and maleic acid
self assemble into nanodiscs
can extract MPs with native bilayer
but sensitive to divalent metal ions (-vely charged carboxylate groups bind to them) can cause aggregate and precipitate
Some proteins req metal ions for function/conf, so is a big hinderance for study of some
Modified SMA polymers can improve tolerance to metal ions
how can the native lipids surrounding a MP in e.g. SMA-derived nanodiscs or peptidiscs be identified
Mass spectrometry
Downsides of extraction of membrane proteins by all detergents, amphipols, nanodiscs, peptidiscs
Dont allow study of MP in a closed system
therefore cant study effect of membrane potential on structure or function (some dependent on memb pot, e.g. voltage-gated ion channels)
benefits of vesicles/liposomes for MP study
allows for a closed system to assess the MP
can do buffer exhange to change the membrane potential
are more native bilayers than e.g. nanodiscs
can tailor vesicle size and lipid composition
downsides of vesicles/liposomes for MP study
likely req tailor vesicle size and composition
may have higher memb curvature than native bilayer, so could perturb protein conformation and function
Protein orientation can affect downstream analysis
multilamellar structures (stacks of bilayers) can also form - affect downstream analysis
can degrade easily - short timeframe to perform experiments following extraction
How can the stability of liposomes be improved
can create hybrids, using polymers
helps maintain stability, so therefore protein stability/activity for longer
(months not days)
problems with overexpressing MPs for extraction
Not increasing lipid formation with it, so get accumulation of MP in memb, higher concs are not native.
may get aberrant structures - native conf dependent on key lipids, may not be enough of them
or misfolding as potentially overloading synthesis machinery - so yield of functional MPs may not be any higher
may need to humanise expression hosts e.g. use Yeast, not bacteria
why is it important to study membrane proteins
lot of therapeutics target MPs, so aids effective development
why it is also useful to know more about key lipids involved in their regulation, can target these regulatory interactions/sites
gram -ve vs gram +ve bacteria
+ve have no outer memb
just a thicker peptidoglycan layer
what structure do most MPs in gram -ve bacteria have
beta barrel
the PMF in gram -ve bact occurs across inner memb, with no ATP in periplasmic space. How may outer MPs be regulated
interact with inner memb proteins
interact with periplasmic chaperones
how are alpha helices and beta strands often found in the memb
alpha helices associated laterally
beta strands form sheets that often form cylindrical structures e.g. b barrel
MPs have diff evolutionary constraints than soluble proteins. What interactions do MPs have to form for hphilic regions to be happy within a hphobic membrane
H bond formation with the backbone is needed to satisfy polar groups (the carbonyl and NH groups), as these would otherise prefer to be buried in a Hphobic core, or face solution (which is what soluble proteins do)
Most residue side chains that face the acyl chains of the bilayer must be hphobic
how do helices and beta strands satisfy their lipid-facing hydrophilic regions
a helices form h bonds within the backbone, so can be inserted by themselves into the membrane - then can associate laterally
beta strands have h bonds within their backbone but also between strands and form sheets - therefore these otherwise polar groups would not like facing lipid
Strands could not be inserted on their own (energetic cost would be too high)
Hbonding of beta sheets can therefore occur between residues distant in the aa sequence.
what are OMPs
beta barrel outer membrane proteins
form pores in gram -ve bact outer memb, mito and chloro
structure of OMPs
9-11 residues in as strand, stands are on a tilt in the memb
even no of antiparallel strands form a barrel
their n and c termini are in the periplasm
variation in loops observed more than strands obvs
Hbonding is the strongest stabilising interaction holding them together
what is the aromatic girdle
ring of mostly aromatic residues (~40%) found at each end of beta barrel proteins, rest are often hphobic still
one half of a girdle is hphobic (face acyl chains of lipids), other is hphilic (solvent facing) (interact with heads of lipids)
e.g. tyrosine and tryptophan have non-polar R groups that face hpobic lipid region, polar amide bonds that face solvent
they stabilise the interface between protein and lipid mols
why are OMPs hard to solubilise
smallest ones have 8 TM b-strands, so lot of hphobic residues that favour facing lipid
do hphobic and hphilic residues alternate in beta strands
yes
which residues are polar in OMPs
solvent facing ones, either at barrel ends, or in facing the interior e.g. channel
what is hard to capture of native membranes in artificial membs
lipid diversity, other proteins, asymmetric distribution of lipids between leaflets
do detergents form bilayers
no, form micelles
why are experimental conditions limited for studying MPs
req maintain the membrane
so req try to accommodate for protein and the memb
difficulties of working with MPs
hard to produce in large quantity
hard to unfold and solubilise completely
often complex
folding/unfolding often not fully reversible
how to study MP folding/unfolding
extract MP, denature in high [urea]
add detergent or lipid
can dilute out urea, get refolding into micelle/bilayer
then can repeatedly change [urea] to observe unfold/refold
how easy it unfolds informs on MP stability
what is circular dichroism
measure the differential absorption of left and righ-handed circular polarised light by the sample. Perform it across a range of wavelengths.
secondary structures have distinct fingerprints (specific minima and maxima)
Can use software to estimate quantitiy of each structure
So can be used to measure unfolding as plot changes/the quantity of each
How can cold SDS page be used to monitor unfolding
migration rate (therefore distance) of folded/unfolded protein differs, so can see proportion of unfolded/folded by seeing their relative insensities.
So can measure it over time in e.g. a denaturing condition
How can tryptophan environment be used to monitor unfolding
measure fluorescent intensity over range of wavelengths
As microenviron of tryptophan residues change in protein the fluorescent intensity at a given wavelenght changes
unfolded and folded state have diff intensity-wavelength plots, can see shift of curve as unfold/fold more
possible peak flattening, sharpening, shifting in a direction, all depends on specific protein
what does a larger more negative delta G mean for a folding reaciton
folding is highly favourable, protein is highly stable