1/21
im gonna lose it
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
“Men being, as has been said, by nature all free, equal, and independent, no one can be put out of this estate, and subjected to the political power of another, without his own consent... when any number of men have, by the consent of every individual, made a community, they have thereby made that community one body, with a power to act as one body, which is only by the will and determination of the majority.”
Who/What: John Locke, Second Treatise of Government
Meaning:
Suggesting that people are able to revoke consent in a meaningful passion, in an idealistic treatise that says “government is good”, it doesn’t acknowledge the fact that it is difficult to undo
For Hobbes you can’t undo it but for Locke it’s unclear on how you’d undo it but he thinks it can be undone if circumstances allow it to happen because you’d be within your rights to do so
If you created a new form of government, it would be a legitimate form of government, as legitimate as the government beforehand
The condition of being free
Patriarchy is not natural
It may be the case that fathers lorded over their children and kings over their land, but that’s not the natural state of things
This is is how history produced a perversion where people are removed from their natural rights
In the beginning, fathers government of children and it developed into people thinking monarchy is okay because they’re used to being subordinate to their fathers therefore you should be comfortable with a monarch
True freedom is going on a path to finding out where your autonomy is from, by nature we are free, equal, and independent and we shouldn’t be subordinate to someone else unless we consent to doing so
All absolute powers at any time when people find themselves put out of their natural estate of freedom, equality, and independence is a form of tyranny and therefore illegitimate form of rule
Significance:
Foundational to political philosophy
Emphasized the importance of natural liberty/natural rights/consent of the governed
Became very important to American Revolutionary ideology
Epitomizes Enlightenment values by recognizing rights/equality for the individuals and criticizing authority/divine right of kings
Expanded on ancient republicanism to ground legitimate politics in our natural condition as human beings
“Toleration is of all things the most conducive to the return of the golden age and the formation of a concert and harmony of a, number of voices and instruments of different tones and notes as agreeable at the very least as the uniformity of a single voice.”
Who/What: Pierre Bayle, SELECTIONS, ON SUPERSTITIONS AND TOLERANCE
Meaning:
Toleration isn’t something that is done because we as humans have to do it, but toleration should be done because it is the best way to be
Toleration is the key to achieving societal perfect harmony
Metaphor that toleration is producing something like the rich harmonics of choral singing instead of just a person singing on their own
Toleration produces the best versions of ourselves
Toleration isn’t a negative doctrine that’s imposed because of circumstance but it’s simply a good thing
Significance:
Advocating for religious tolerance at a time of heavy persecution was very controversial at the time
He also argued that it was actually more pious to be tolerant of others which was a groundbreaking notion
Toleration allows for people to stop paying attention to other people and instead be more reflective and cultivate their own individual pious life
“We find, in all religions of the earth, a God of armies, a jealous God, an avenging God, a destroying God, a God, who is pleased with carnage, and whom his worshippers, as a duty, serve to his taste. Lambs, bulls, children, men, heretics, infidels, kings, whole nations are sacrificed to him... the gloomy ideas of the divinity, far from consoling men under the evils of life, have everywhere disquieted and confused their minds, and produced follies destructive to their happiness.”
Who/What: BARON D’HOLBACH, Le Bons Sens – “Common Sense” – No Need of Theology, only of Reason”
Meaning:
Religious intolerance and destructive behavior is fostered by an interpretation of God as wrathful
A belief in the call of divinity causes those to be confused and produce follies that are destructive to their own happiness
Religion makes people believe in a higher power that they have to sacrifice for and it doesn’t bring any comfort to the evils of life
Atheism is associated with immorality, but the way religious people approach life is anything but moral and and just for their minds– D’holbach points out the hypocrisy of contemporary religion
Significance:
Positive argument for atheism, the only way you can be virtuous is by being atheist. Because you’re listening to reason instead of divine voices to become virtuous
Contrasted from Bayle’s version of atheism which only proposes the belief that it is possible to have a society of virtuous atheists but D’holbach argues that the only way to be moral is to not rely on religion at all
“O virtue! Sublime science of simple souls, are so many troubles and trappings necessary for one to know you? Are your principles not engraved in all hearts, and in order to learn your laws is it not enough to go back into oneself and listen to the voice of one's conscience in the silence of the passions? There you have true philosophy. Let us learn to
be satisfied with that, and without envying the glory of those famous men who are immortalized in the republic of letters, let us try to set between them and us that glorious distinction which people made long ago between two great peoples: one knew how to speak well; the other how to act well.”
Who/What: Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Discourse on the Arts and Sciences
Meaning:
This statement was meant to be a subversion of typical Enlightenment thinking through encouraging introspection and common sense rather than external forms of knowledge
However, by doing this he is still trying to promote a different form of epistemological thought and definitions for philosophy which also is just the enlightenment
Without being envious of other enlightenment thinkers who are trying to promote different ways of thinking we should all go back to our roots and really self reflect on what we personally think is right instead of building our morals from another person
Significance:
A really important document that tries to challenge the optimism of the Enlightenment
Tries arguing that Enlightenment thinking is actually tainting human morality and virtue
Not only did it contribute to enlightenment discussions on morality and virtue but it also played more into the romantic movement by de-emphasizing pragmatism in favor of human sentimentality
“If we value independence, the love of study is, of all the passions, the one that contributes most to our happiness... the love of study is much less necessary to the happiness of men than it is to that of women.... women are excluded, by definition, from every kind of glory, and when, by chance, one is born with a rather superior soul, only study remains to console her for all the exclusions and all the dependencies to which she finds herself condemned by her place in society.”
Who/What: Émilie du Châtelet’s Theory of Happiness 1744
Meaning:
Women can teach you to be happy within constraints in a way that men cannot
For a woman, you have to figure out your own independence within the constraints in which you live
Studying is okay for the happiness of a man but for a woman it is absolutely essential because women are excluded from every kind of glory
Only study remains to console her for the exclusions and dependencies that she’s condemned from
Space of freedom in study but argues that study is the passion most necessary for happiness for EVERYONE
Women have something to teach about everybody and themselves, EVERYONE needs to be studying regardless
Her general observation that happiness needs to be found where you sit, happiness is found in your personal circumstances that you are embedded in means that you all have constraints in your life and your path to happiness may vary from person to person
Women show that principle of “being happy where you are” more than men can because men have the liberty to all dream of being president one day
Significance:
Foundational feminist theory
Allows for encouraging women to study and participate in the Enlightenment
It also advocated for women’s personal intellectual fulfillment and personal autonomy during the Enlightenment, which typically only allowed academic pursuit for men
“Nature produces forms that are more regular the closer nature comes, bit by bit, to its putative midpoint, in a moderate climate, as was shown in the first chapter. Thus, our own and the Greek concepts of beauty, which are taken from the most regular appearance, are more correct than those conceived by peoples who are at a half remove from the exact likeness of their Creator.”
Who/What: Johann Winckelmann, History of the Art of Antiquity
Meaning:
There was not just one antiquity
Looking at art from different periods of time, you can see transformations of Greek culture
Historically changing background/dynamic in which through art you could understand change and broader culture
All sorts of things depend on climate
The influence of climate invigorates art, and Greek climate invigorates beautiful art
The perfect climate for art is one where you don’t have to work too hard because it’s warm, not too cold, etc.
Greek climate is ideal for art and that’s why their art looks like that
Winckelmann's theory of climate and art, moderation is key to the flourishing of the best kinds of art
Europeans, specifically those living in temperate parts of Europe are closer to living in the likenesses of their creators
They are gonna create the best kind of art
White reflects the most rays of life and the whiter a body is the more beautiful it is
Greek statues were painted and he argues that they NEEDED to be white because white is beautiful
Conforms to the idea that “form is the most beautiful thing”
Participating in broader set of prescriptive and normative projects where certain standards of beauty are elevated to a higher standard
Significance:
Advocated for going back to the ancients
Also was a pretty foundation document for white supremacist ideology
Symbol of perfection of Greek Art
Advocating for a return to classicism/neo-classicism
Efforts to explain standards of beauty, now it’s considered a worthy science that comes out of the enlightenment
Advocates for aesthetics to be studied on its own terms
Nazism as an obsession of the purity of Greek art
18th century science has an intricate complicated relationship with race, aesthetics, and science, importance of history to art amd theories of beauty
Normative/prescriptive definitions for what beauty is
“He may call himself an naturalist... who well distinguishes the parts of natural bodies by sight... Natural science is that classification and that name-giving of the natural bodies… The foundation of botany consists in the division of plants and systematic name giving, generic and specific...”
Who/What: Carl Linnaeus, Systema de Naturae
Meaning:
It is science because it is theology
Reflects the kind of orderly world that God built for us
Ecology, ecological natural history
If you can create proper names and descriptions for everything and if you do that you can create systematic laws
You can discover certain natural laws by amassing a massive quantity of information in each one
You can find a lot of information studying plants because plants aren’t running away when you’re trying to study them
Proposed to organize the natural world into 3 kingdoms: minerals, vegetables, and animals
Not just a chart of animals, but a chart that shows the fundamental architecture of a divinely ordered universe
Significance:
Linnaeus was responsible for the naming of nature in the 18th century
Established binomial nomenclature that we still use today
Allowed for the consistent global naming of creatures/foundations of modern taxonomy
“if you care for true piety, let us not feign agreement where diversity is evidently the plan and purpose of Providence... Why should we make ourselves unrecognizable to each other in the most important concerns of our life by masquerading, since God has stamped everyone, not without reason, with his own facial features?... a union of faiths is not tolerance; it is diametrically opposed to true tolerance!”
Who/What: Mendelssohn, Jerusalem: Or On Religious Power and Judaism
Meaning:
The ultimate project of “converting everyone to some higher standard so you can leave behind “the most important concerns of your life” by flattening out the particularities of your individual features is NOT the plan of providence
Trying to achieve a higher standard by abandoning what is most important to you is not how you achieve enlightenment
True tolerance can’t include something like unity at the end of the day but diversity and enduring difference
Significance:
Mendelssohn was a deeply radical figure
Deeply inside the enlightenment and knew all of its main figures and main institutions but mendelsohn also lay outside of it
Claims for rationality could in fact be a mask for more parochial interests
Rationality might be a way of masking what you really mean which is christianity
New forms of older arguments for ex) voltaire’s arguments on toleration had cast jews governed remnant clinging to irrational laws when jesus os “more rational”
Calls attention to reflexes of christian enlightenment/europe and forces people to question if consensus is really the aim of the enlightenment
“To be sure we cannot hope any more to come upon the unaltered original human form anywhere in the world. .... But that portion of the earth between the 31st and 52nd parallels in the Old World (which seems to earn the name of Old World even from the standpoint of peopling) is rightly held to be that... where man too must have departed the least from his original formation because from here he is equally well prepared for all transplantations. Here, to be sure, we find white inhabitants...”
Who/What: Kant, of the Different Races
Meaning:
With white people, you can see the closest version of Adam
What’s interesting abt white ppl isn’t just that they’re closest to the original adams but that they’re the best poised to flourish all over the world because they have the seed of/they are prepared for all the transformations to come
On the other hand, there’s a theory in the 18th century that if you have a climatological view where black people are black because there’s carbon in the air– shows a robust literature that race isn’t something that is genetically coded but environmentally coded
Significance:
Debate on whether or not Jews were white
Foundational document for scientific racism
Establishes a form of explicit race theory that placed white Europeans at the top
Also reflects developing climatological views on race that were popular in the 18th century
“Society in every state is a blessing, but government, even it its best state, is but a necessary evil... Government, like dress, is the badge of lost innocence; the palaces of kings are built upon the ruins of the bowers of paradise. For were the impulses of conscience clear, uniform and irresistibly obeyed, man would need no other lawgiver; but that not being the case, he finds it necessary to surrender up a part of his property to furnish means for the protection of the rest.... Here then is the origin and rise of government; namely, a mode rendered necessary by the inability of moral virtue to govern the world.”
Who/What: Thomas Paine, Common Sense
Meaning:
What is primarily important are social relations, sociability, society is the first thing about how humans relate to one another
Moral virtue is prior to government and in fact moral virtue could judge the actions of kings
Similar to Rousseau who says that we could live free without government but we cannot we are built in such a way to try and become better, we want to have more and because we want more, we need government to manage us
Government to help repair the fact we can’t be virtuous on our own
Best government is the most virtuous government or the government that is the best one is one that allows virtue to flourish
We need a thick moral community before you have a proper government, people need to behave towards one another with obligation and affection
Government is not just a set of institutions, it is the making of a people
Significance:
Document that epitomizes the language and beliefs of the Enlightenment
Criticisms of the British government, argues that the British government is the combination of two ancient tyrannies, monarchy and aristocracy
Justification of rebellion that you are entitled to rebel if it is not representative of your interests
World will be peaceful if it is full of republics
Reflection of the 7 years war, diplomatic organization
Was a foundational document for the American Revolution that convinced colonists to support independence from Britain
Advocated for critique of monarchial systems and natural rights
“If the spring of popular government in time of peace is virtue, the springs of popular government in revolution are at once virtue and terror: virtue, without which terror is fatal; terror, without which virtue is powerless. Terror is nothing other than justice, prompt, severe, inflexible; it is therefore an emanation of virtue; it is not so much a special principle as it is a consequence of the general principle of democracy applied to our country's most urgent needs”.
Who/What: Maximillien Robespierre, On Principles of Political Morality, 1794
Meaning:
A good government may need to use terror in a time of revolution
There is an occasion where the use of terror is justified
Terror is important to protect virtue as a form of swift justice
Virtue is a foundation during peacetime but when revolution comes by Terror has to exist as a form of virtue to enforce democratic ideals
Terror is not just snapping off of heads but it’s the terror of justice
Terror of the law itself and its the opposite of virtue
Virtue requires you to do certain things but Terror says “you must”
Revolutionary terror, the law of suspects, punishment of conspirators and traitors are a form of pedagogy
They are trying to create the citizens that the republic is going to need when the revolution is going to end
It is necessary to change hearts and minds
You can have as many formal laws as you want, but if people don’t believe in them and behave as that, you are going to have empty formalism, you won’t have a living citizenship or living republic
Terror shapes revolutionary citizenship
Significance:
Controversial in the face of violence in France at the time
Gets Robespierre caught in the legal net himself
Logic of the terror is that it’s hard to rein it in
St. Just, George Damons, Robespierre all get sent to the chopping block for conspiring under the same criminal statues for conspiracy against the revolution, aspiring to tyranny, everything they worked for to try and eradicate
I guess contributes to connections on Enlightenment and Revolution
Reflection of everything that went wrong during the Enlightenment
Liberty, equality, and fraternity leads to regicide
People are now retroactively defining what the Enlightenment had been about, new phase of looking back at the Revolution to put it in the past
“The more one examines the apparently most active personages in the Revolution, the more one finds in them something passive and mechanical. We cannot repeat too often that men do not lead the Revolution; it is the Revolution that uses men. They are right when they say it goes all alone. This phrase means that never has the Divinity shown itself so clearly in any human event. If the vilest instruments are employed, punishment is for the sake of regeneration.”
Who/What: Joseph de Maistre, Considérations on France, 1796
Meaning:
Argues that the bloodshed of the revolution is a dark pedagogy for France and Europe that had forgotten the workings of God
Jacobins thought they were in charge but they were all put to death which confirms that there is a deep logic to the revolution that is working itself out in such a way as to produce the politics that de Maistre was so committed to
Revolution was a divine secret way of working towards a moral regeneration
Revolution is a means that will get rid of the Enlightenment altogether and work towards the creation of a new Europe that is no longer committed to Enlightenment ideas and instead a new form of Catholic piety
Significance:
Hugely popular with 19th-century conservative Catholic theorists
Argues for the understanding of the Revolution as an operation of a broader providential history
Foundational for political conservatism, a critique of the Enlightenment, and important for counter-Revolutionary thought
Monogenesis
Definition:
The notion that we are all one species, all the people you see around you come from around one common stock
Based on the original scriptural passage of Adam and Eve, Tower of Babel also used to explain how humans come from a similar stock and thus become separated
Used to explain anthropology, family/gender relations, to explain the origins of clothing, origins of shame, explaining the common behaviors and sentiments of humans
When: 18th-century
Important Figures:
Linnaeus, Buffon
Significance:
Used for pious anthropological explanations on human origin
Created a scientific-theological framework for human unity
Contrasted polygenism, which was often used to explain racial differences/justify racial hierarchy and slavery
Foundational for modern anthropology
Plays a diff role in 18th century in human variation discussions
Haskalah
Definition:
Mendelssohn– the reform project in Judaism is Haskalah
Hallah is the law, Haskea is the reform movement
Project to rethink wisdom in Jewish terms, one of Mendelssohn’s life projects
When:
18th-19th century
Important Figures:
Mendelssohn
Significance:
Transforms modern Judaism, creates the landscape
Judaism splits in the Reformed vs. Orthodox sections in 19th century, emerges out of the Haskalah tradition, becomes super integrationist
It’s not a side movement, its a transformation of judaism in its entirety
Feminism
Definition:
Movement that advocated for the democratization of intellectual culture to involve women as individuals that are capable of achieving Enlightenment and proper education
Feminism advocated to free women from patriarchal bondage and for their personal intellectual fulfillment
Important Figures:Mary Astell, Emilie du Chatelet, Wollstonecraft
Significance:
Emphasizes the really important role that women had on the Enlightenment and how they were also responsible for spreading the Enlightenment to everyone else
Women were involved in the upkeep of reading salons, which helped make the Enlightenment/education more accessible and egalitarian for everyone.
Epigenesis
Definition:
Theory developed by Aristotle that there aren’t necessarily seeds in either man or woman, it takes two material components and then matter begins to organize itself
Matter creating itself that happens when it is configured properly which would then create a living being
Something about all living things that come from the exuberance of the material itself
Developed the term polygenesis, which defines itself as different races are not different races but instead different species
Question of whether or not you could have pious material, pious science– do you need a creator to explain where the more complicated forms of life including humans come from, can that come from the material world itself
Important Figures:
Kant, Blumenbach, Hume
Significance: sparked debates between many philosophers on where life came from, shows the divide biology/physics with a more divine, ordered world
The Encyclopédie
Definition:
First started as a publishing/moneymaking venture cooked up by Andrew Francois le Breton
Encyclopédie was a massive reference work edited by Denis Diderot and Jean le Rond d’Alembert. It aimed to gather and organize knowledge, reflecting the Enlightenment values of reason and progress.
When: 18th century
Important Figures: Denis Diderot, Jean le Rond d’Alembert
Significance:
Dissemination of different beliefs
Shows the enlightenment is ideologically incoherent just because theres different perspectives
Diderot “progress is the future” versus dolboch “we need to look at the past”
It’s also important for the democratization and making information more accessible to the average person
The virtuous atheist
Definition:
A pushback against the longstanding preconception that in order to live in a virtuous life you had to believe in God
An attempt to loosen up the traditional association of piety and virtue and atheism/immorality
A belief in a virtue independent of piety
When: 17-18th century
Important Figures: Bayle, D’Holbach
Bayle: It is possible to have a society of virtuous atheists, temperament vs. belief
D’holbach: The only path to true morality is reason
Significance:
Pushback against a longstanding Christian belief that associates atheism with immorality, adultery, treachery, etc.
Conceptualizes a belief that morality is not exclusive to religion and that societal good comes from reason and humanism instead of divine command
Aesthetics
Definition:
Greek word meaning experience
18th-century definition is the sciences of perception but later developed to be the sciences of the arts and defining what is beautiful, what is not
Part of a broader evaluation thats called the human sciences in the 18th century like anthropology, history, or sciences of human culture
Important Figures: Kant, Winckelmann, Shaftesbury, Hume, Addison, Lessing
Significance:
Western definitions of beauty, not just aesthetics, but theory of beauty and a science behind things
Effort to explain why you might have a broad consensus even universal consensus as to what constitutes something as beautiful
Contributed to controversial race theory debates
Citizenship
Definition:
You not only have the right to live somewhere, you’re protected by the laws of a particular polity
In Ancient Greece, it meant that you had the obligation to participate in civil government
It is everywhere but considered a precious commodity, but it is derived from your status as a natural person bearing certain kinds of natural rights
Government rests on a foundation of citizenship and is there to protect citizens
Important Figures: John Locke, Rousseau, Thomas Paine, Montesquieu
Significance:
Defines human individualism
Important for conversations about natural rights
Was important to American doctrine post-revolution
Also discussions on citizenship allowed for people to think of individuals own reason, liberty, participation, and it was a cornerstone for modern democracies
Transformation from a person as a subject to a person bearing their own individual rights that lead to civic virtue and duty
Monarchical patriotism
Definition:
Love/loyalty for your country is directly related to your loyalty to the monarch
Assumed that it was relatively easy to imagine the monarch as a citizen alongside other citizens in this body known as a state
Implied the existence of monarchical citizenship, which was controversial because many perceive the monarch as the top of the state with privileges unlike the average citizen, and that he is the entity in which the law flows from
When: ~Late 17-18th centuries,
Important Figures: Thomas Abbt,
Significance: Explosions of monarchical patriotism comes after the great defeat of Frederick at the Battle of Kuersdorf in 1759
Those against anti-monarchical patriotism especially during the French Revolution further amplify discussions on citizenship
The social contract
Definition: Theory that people agree to form societies and governments in exchange for protection and the benefits of organized life
When: 17-18th centuries
Important Figures: Hobbes, Rousseau, John Locke
Locke: Natural rights
Hobbes: Sovereign
Rousseau, general will of the people, popular sovereignty
Significance:
Allowed for people to redefine government authority as stemming from the people’s agreement to be governed and to give up their own natural freedoms for security
Influenced the Declaration of Independence, modern democracy and was foundational for Enlightenment era political thought