BCS 111 Lecture 12

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/35

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

36 Terms

1
New cards

Piaget’s Cognitive development stages

  • Sensorimotor stage (birth - ~ 1.5 yo)

  • Preoperational stage (1.5 – 7 yo)

  • Concrete operations stage (7 – 12 yo)

  • Formal operations stage ( > 12 yo)

2
New cards

Operation

  • Why is it called “operation”?→ Mental operation of “representations”

3
New cards

What is exactly a mental representation?

Simply put: a long-term memory trace of an object/concept/word/event, etc.

  • Each box = mental representation

4
New cards

Sensorimotor stage (birth - ~ 1.5 yo)

Building up the “database” of memory representations through sensory input and perception

5
New cards

(cont)

Lack of object permanence: Why peek-a-boo is funny to babies (esp. before 8 mo).

  • Due to very weak memory representation of objects → weak concept of “existence”

6
New cards

Preoperational stage (1.5 – 7 yo)

  • Burst of vocabulary size

  • Arbitrary connection between sound and object

    • Language-specific labels (i.e. words)

7
New cards

(cont)

Egocentric: thinking from one’s own perspective

8
New cards

Development of “Theory of Mind”

Seeing from others’ perspectives: Three-mountain task

9
New cards

Development of Theory of mind in the preoperational stage:

Interpretation of others’ behaviors and feelings

  • Seeing from others’ perspectives

  • Sympathy

  • Lying/cheating

  • Socialization

10
New cards

Testing Theory of Mind

Sally-Anne false belief task

Sally (left) has a basket and Anne has a box. Sally put her marble in the basket and then left. Anne moved the marble to the box. Where will Sally look for her marble when she returns?

<p><span><span>Sally-Anne false belief task</span></span><br></p><p><span><span>Sally (left) has a basket and Anne has a box. Sally put her marble in the basket and then left. Anne moved the marble to the box. Where will Sally look for her marble when she returns?</span></span></p>
11
New cards

(cont)

If answer: The box: from “your” (observer’s) perspective (failed the test!)

The basket: Sally’s perspective (evidence of ToM)

12
New cards

Theory of mind

  • Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD): tend to look for the marble in the box

  • Delayed development of ToM

13
New cards

Another characteristic of preoperational stage: fail to mentally reverse an action

  • Conservation tasks: judge if the two sets of dots are of equal quantity or length

  • Preoperational children judge only by perceived difference → incorrect judgment on transformed stimulus

<ul><li><p><span><span>Conservation tasks: judge if the two sets of dots are of equal quantity or length</span></span></p></li><li><p><span><span>Preoperational children judge only by perceived difference → incorrect judgment on transformed stimulus</span></span></p></li></ul><p></p>
14
New cards

Concrete operations stage (7 – 12 yo)

  • Theory of mind developed

  • Ability to “reverse” transformation in the conservation task → better judgment

  • Developed sense of quantity

15
New cards

Formal operations stage ( > 12 yo)

-

16
New cards

Logical thinking

solving abstract logic problems

17
New cards

Reflective abstraction

learning by self-reflection from past experiences

  • Capable of abstract mental operations using mental representations

18
New cards

Potential problems with Piaget’s theory

  • Does everyone follow those discrete stages of development?

  • Age range reliable in each range?

  • Theorized based on small sample size (Piaget’s 3 children)

19
New cards

(cont)

Experimenter’s bias in asking questions

<p><span><span>Experimenter’s bias in asking questions</span></span></p>
20
New cards

One evidence against Piaget’s theory of development: Perceptual development in infancy

  • Predictions based on Piaget’s theory: babies in sensorimotor stage should show no differences in their responses when seeing both events.

  • HOWEVER, 3-mo babies already show surprisal effect when seeing the impossible event!!

<ul><li><p><span><span>Predictions based on Piaget’s theory: babies in sensorimotor stage should show no differences in their responses when seeing both events.</span></span></p></li><li><p><span><span>HOWEVER, 3-mo babies already show surprisal effect when seeing the impossible event!!</span></span></p></li></ul><p></p>
21
New cards

Other views on cognitive development…a review

-

22
New cards

Nativism

biologically determined (nature)

23
New cards

Empiricism

learning through experiences (nurture)

24
New cards

Behaviorism

conditioning and reinforcement

25
New cards

Nature vs. Nurture debate

which one plays a bigger role in development

  • Some insights from studies of twins who grow apart

  • Twins studies show that genes seem to play a bigger role in development, but learning and experiences are still crucial

26
New cards

Other perspectives on cognitive development

Empiricism: Mind as a blank slate at birth

  • Knowledge built upon experiences and education

27
New cards

(cont)

Behaviorism

  • Learning through conditioning and
    reinforcement

  • Stimulus-response

28
New cards

Chomsky’s view of development - Nativism

  • Pre-wired biological functions - innateness

  • Innate ability to acquire any language regardless of how complex it is

  • The input from the environment is not good enough for children to acquire their native language

29
New cards

Brain development

  • Growing frontal lobe: developing language, emotion, inhibitory control, etc.

  • Growing gyri and sulci

  • Development of neural network: expanding connections among regions

30
New cards

Development of Attention

Shift from holistic to analytic approaches as a child gets older

  • “Find the two pictures that match exactly.” Older children can do this better than younger children

    • Pay more attention to details/features (analytic approach)

<p><span><span>Shift from holistic to analytic approaches as a child gets older</span></span></p><ul><li><p><span><span>“Find the two pictures that match exactly.” Older children can do this better than younger children</span></span></p><ul><li><p><span><span>Pay more attention to details/features (analytic approach)</span></span></p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p>
31
New cards

Development of object recognition

  • 2-3 yo categorize objects by shape with the same label: “shape bias”

  • 12-18 mo don’t show strong shape bias → less attentive to shapes

<ul><li><p>2-3 yo categorize objects by shape with the same label: “shape bias”</p></li><li><p>12-18 mo don’t show strong shape bias → less attentive to shapes</p></li></ul><p></p>
32
New cards

What if we manipulate the details of the object to examine how children categorize them?

  • 16.5 - 29 mo young children divided into 3 groups based on vocabulary size (see next slide)

  • English as their first language

  • Task: Object identification by pointing at or picking up the picture

<ul><li><p><span><span>16.5 - 29 mo young children divided into 3 groups based on vocabulary size (see next slide)</span></span></p></li><li><p><span><span>English as their first language</span></span></p></li><li><p><span><span>Task: Object identification by pointing at or picking up the picture</span></span></p></li></ul><p></p>
33
New cards

Development of object recognition

  • 3 subgroups of young children with varying vocabulary size

  • Productive vocabulary: words they can produce

<ul><li><p><span><span>3 subgroups of young children with varying vocabulary size</span></span></p></li><li><p><span><span>Productive vocabulary: words they can produce</span></span></p></li></ul><p></p>
34
New cards

(cont)

  • Group III showed no sig. diff. among the 3 types of objects

  • Among the 3 types of objects, categorization of shape caricature is highly correlated with vocab. size → Larger vocab. size leads to better categorization just by rough sketches of objects

<ul><li><p><span><span>Group III showed no sig. diff. among the 3 types of objects</span></span></p></li><li><p><span><span>Among the 3 types of objects, categorization of shape caricature is highly correlated with vocab. size → Larger vocab. size leads to better categorization just by rough sketches of objects</span></span></p></li></ul><p></p>
35
New cards

Development of working memory

  • Working memory capacity increases with age

  • Alternative explanations:

    • Processing speed (instead of memory capacity) increases with age

    • Less familiar with the experimental contexts and procedures at younger ages

<ul><li><p><span><span>Working memory capacity increases with age</span></span></p></li><li><p><span><span>Alternative explanations:</span></span></p><ul><li><p><span><span>Processing speed (instead of memory capacity) increases with age</span></span></p></li><li><p><span><span>Less familiar with the experimental contexts and procedures at younger ages</span></span></p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p>
36
New cards

Summary: Cognitive development

  • Some potential problems with Piaget’s stages of development: age range, sample size, “operations” in each stage

  • Nature vs. Nurture: twins studies show that genes seem to play a bigger role in development, but learning and experiences are still crucial.

  • Young children (before 3 yo) pay less attention to details of an object in categorization → shape bias shown in 2-3 yo

  • Abstraction in categorization develops with vocabulary size.

  • Working memory development can also correlate with processing speed and familiarity with the tasks.