1/74
study well
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Negotiation
A process of settling differences through a discussion of issues.
Consensus Building
Process of working toward achieving general agreement within a group.
Persuasion
Process of inducing (convincing) others into accepting a point of view by means of reasoning and argumentation.
Compromise
Process of making concessions (giving something up) to settle differences.
Federalism
system of government where there is separation of powers between the national and local governments
Confederation
political group or people form an alliance
Direct Democracy
Citizens decide laws and policies rather than electives better in a tiny population
Representative Democracy
Citizens vote for their representatives to make decisions for them
Autocracy
A system of government where one person has absolute power and authority, making decisions without input from others.
Oligarchy
small group of people making decisionstypically for a larger population, often prioritizing their own interests over the common good.
Parliamentary system
A democratic form of government where the executive branch derives its legitimacy from the legislature and is held accountable to it, often characterized by a prime minister as head of government.
Divine Right Theory
Theory that the leader is chosen by god.
Echo chamber effect
What you believe, is what you search for. Effect is why you see so much political bias. URL’s .com, ect., no author, selling ads.
Fake news
News that is fake
Hobbes
Deep distrust in human race, thought humans were selfish. Because of this he had more trust in the government, rather than humans so wanted a strong government.
Rousseau
Lots of trust for humans (Except the rich and wealthy). Had no trust in the government and wanted a direct democracy so people can vote on every societal issue.
Locke
Trusted the people the most out of all the philosophers and wanted a representative democracy because he was influenced by the constitutional framers.
Federalists thought…
the new congress/government should be kept because it would be controlled by smart/ experienced men, They would have both federal and state governments to create check and balances to keep the governments equal. Believed that the states should be connected so there would be no chaos
Anti-Federalists thought…
a national government would be too hard to control and favorized a smaller government would be better and a new constitution will be dangerous. Didn’t think they can ever make a perfect union.
Anti-Federalists were…
Slave holders
E Pluribus Unum
phrase that means “out of many one”
Expressed powers
Powers physically granted to congres
Implied Powers
Powers physically granted to congress
Mccullough V Marylnd
A landmark Supreme Court case that established the principle of federal supremacy over state laws and confirmed the constitutionality of the Bank of the United States.
Marbury V Madison
A landmark Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review, allowing the Court to overturn laws deemed unconstitutional.
legislative branch
Make laws
executive branch
enforces laws
judicial branch
Determines if they are constitutional
Seperation of powers
The division of government responsibilities into distinct branches to limit any one branch from exercising the core functions of another.
Checks & balances
A system that ensures no one branch of government becomes too powerful by allowing each branch to monitor and limit the actions of the others.
federalism
A system of government in which power is divided between a central authority and constituent political units, such as states.
popular sovereignty
The principle that the authority of a government is created and sustained by the consent of its people, through their elected representatives.
limited government
A governing body whose powers are restricted by law, usually through a constitution, to protect individual rights and liberty.
judicial branch
The branch of government responsible for interpreting laws and administering justice, comprised of courts and judges.
Free exercise clause
Protecting citizens right to practice their religion with limitations
Establishment clause
Prohibiting a government from establishing a religion. Or making a law toward a religion.
Seditious speech
threatening government or violating them
Prior restraint
when government stops the press from publishing something because it will make it a threat to national society
View point discrimmination
Where Government treats someone differently because of their opinions or beliefs
Schneck v US
During World war 1, Mr. Schenck and Ms. Baer sent out pamphlets encouraging people to not sign up for the draft. Their speech was limited because it was during such a vital point in winning the war.If they allowed the speech to pass it would put the countries safety at risk because they wouldn’t be able to get a strong military.
Seditious speech
Created danger to national society
Speech is different when its during war
Espionage act
Arrested, rightly so
Texas V johnson
1984, The conflict started when Johnson burned an american flag in a protest of Ronald Reagan’s policies. His first amendment right was protected. His right was protected by symbolic speech or political speech.
Protest against a national party
Society found burning usa flag offensive
Viewpoint discrimination
Political speech in a public forum
B.L v Mahoney
During 2021 January-June, Speaker was Brandi Levy A student at Mahanoy high school. She was dissing a bunch of school sports on snap because she couldn’t make the varsity teams. The speech was protected because it was off of school property and not in school hours if it was in school her speech would be limited
Off campus speech that didn’t impact learning
Vulgar student speech off campus
Didn’t interfere with the any work of school
Political speech in a public form
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier |
1980’s, Cathy Kuhlmeier sued hazelwood east highschool for when the principle edited the school sponsored article about teen pregnancy and abortion. The school found the articles inappropriate and since the articles were school sponsored they had the right to do what they want with them
School journalism (the spectrum)
Speech that bears the reputation of the school
Gov speech not student speech
Tinker v. Des Moines |
Time period was during the late 60’s. Speakers were John and mary tinker and Chris Ekhartd and they wore black armbands to protest the involvement in the vietnam war. The court ruled in favor of the students because it wasn’t bothering any other students education.
Black armbands
Did Not interfere with the work of the school
Symbolic speech in a school forum
Viewpoint discrimmination
Kowalski v. Berkeley
In 2011, Kara Kowalski the speaker claims the her punishment made here become socially isolated from her peers and received bad treatment from teachers and administrators. She created a myspace page dedicated to making fun of her classmates. The case was limited the school is allowed to take action because she was targeting someone.
Hate site, led to students missing school
Anti cyber bullying laws
Interfered with the work of school
Wallace v. Jaffree
An Alabama law authorized a period of silence for “meditation or voluntary prayer”. In their practice, prayer was often read out loud in unison. The state of Alabama couldn’t do this because the government is pretty much endorsing religion. If it was a private school they were able to practice religion as much as they want.
Violated establishment clause
“Meditation and voluntary prayer”
School led prayer in class
Students who didnt join were ostracized
Santa Fe. V Doe
Texas school district policy suggested a student-lead prayer before football games. During class students would vote on which student would lead the prayer that week. The prayer would be said over the stadiums P.A system. Mormons and catholic student and parents filed a lawsuit arguing it violated the establishment clause. Since others might not be religious this is viewed as government endorsing religion. Since it was public speech it was forcing others to support or participate in the prayer.
Student led prayer at football game, speech was done over Pa system
Violated establishment clause
New York Times v. US
Time period is in vietnam war, and one source says America is doing really well in the war, and another source says that America is doing really terrible and it looks bad. A man has access to the pentagon papers and he shows others that the government is lying to everyone. They give hints every day. The government tells NY times to censor what they're sharing and NY times sues. Since what NY times is doing it is not protecting are national security especially the time period were in. Court decides that they have freedom of press unless it harms national security.
Censorship of pentagon papers
Publishing leaked, classified info
Prior restraint
Violated press clause
substansive due process
prohibits the government from infringing on fundamental constitutional liberties like your life, liberty, and property
procedral due process
Making sure the government followed procedures when taking away your life, liberty, and property
writ of habeas corpus
Requires the court to present evidence against you to the court pre trial
bail
Temporary release of an accused person while in jail
grand jury
decides if it should be taken to trial
the exclusionary rule
prevents government from using evidence that violates the defendants rights
double jeopardy
A suspect can’t be tried or punished for the same crime twice
miranda rights
rights stated before trial/at time of arrest right to a lawyer, right to remain silent Not obligated/no pressure to give information.
suffrage
your right to vote
De jure segregation
segregation enacted by federal, state, and local governments
De facto segregation
Segregation enacted by private actors w/o direct government involvement
Civil Rights Act of 1964
removed barriers to black enfranchisement in the south, banning poll taxes, literacy tests, and other measures that effectively prevented african americans from voting. *Disallows discrimination of race, sex, national origin, and religion.
grandfather clause
restricting african americans to vote due to their ancestors not being eligible to.
Redlining
the practice of denying people access to credit because of where they live, even if they are personally qualified for loans.
*Tended to be obviously black neighborhoods
Explicit racial bias
aware of our racial bias, tend to embrace it
Implicit racial bias
unaware of the racial bias
Jim crow laws
state and federal secregrated laws
Scott V Sanford
In this case Dred Scott a slave. Argued that he and his family shall be freed because they lived on property where slavery was banned. After many and countless suing it was finalized that salves weren’t citizens in the United States nor they can’t be protected by the federal government
Plessy V Ferguson
an African American man from New Orleans named Homer Plessy challenged segregated train cars. In 1892, Plessy boarded a "whites-only" compartment on a train, and was arrested when he refused to move to a "colored" compartment when called upon to do so. (Plessy planned to be arrested, intending to test the constitutionality of Louisiana's segregation law by arguing that it violated the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection under the law for all citizens). Plessy's case against segregation wound its way through the court system, finally arriving in the Supreme Court in 1896.