MMW | Module 6.1 & 6.2 MATHEMATICS OF VOTING, and THE MATHEMATICS OF APPORTIONMENT

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 2 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/62

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

63 Terms

1
New cards

Plurality Winner

Candidate with more first place votes than the other

2
New cards

Plurality Method

The most votes

3
New cards

Majority Winner

Candidate with more than 50% of the first-place votes

4
New cards

Majority Method

Most of the Votes

5
New cards

Not Every Plurality is Majority

Every majority is plurality but?

6
New cards

Voting Method

Mathematical procedure that uses data from the preference table to determine a winner

7
New cards

Majority Method

It is a good method of voting but only guarantees a winner if there are two candidates and an odd number of voters.

8
New cards

Majority Method

If there are more than two candidates, it is possible that none of the candidates receives a majority and thus no winner could be determined by majority rules

9
New cards

Plurality Method

This is by far the simplest and widely-used voting method.

10
New cards

Plurality Method

It may require a tie-breaker though.

11
New cards

Plurality Method

Voting system here in the Philippines uses this method in barangay, local, and national elections.

12
New cards

Plurality Method

Voters simply choose candidates without ranking them.

13
New cards

Plurality Method

Pres. Duterte wins the 2016 election using the?

14
New cards

Majority Method

Pres. Bongbong Marcos wins the 2022 election using the?

15
New cards

Borda Count Method

Each voter ranks all the candidates; that is, each voter selects his or her first choice, second choice, and third choice, and so on. If there are n candidates, each candidate receives n point for each first-place vote, (n-1) points for each second-choice vote, (n-2) points for each third-choice, and so on. The total points received for each candidate from all voters are added.

16
New cards

Borda Count Method

The candidate with the most total points (referred to as a candidate's Borda score) is declared the winner.

17
New cards

Plurality with Elimination Method

Each person votes for his or her favorite candidate receives a majority of votes, that candidate is declared the winner. If no candidate receives a majority, then the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated and a new election is held. The process continues until a candidate receives a majority of the votes.

18
New cards

Pairwise Comparison Method

This method is otherwise known as Copeland's method.

19
New cards

Copeland's Method

This method is otherwise known as Pairwise Comparison Method

20
New cards

Pairwise Comparison Method

It is sometimes referred to as the head-to-head method or one-to-one comparison.

21
New cards

Pairwise Comparison Method

Each voter ranks all of the candidates; that is, each voter selects his or her first-choice, second choice, third choice, and so on. For each possible pairing of candidates, the candidate with the most votes receives 1 point; if there is a tie, each candidate receives 0.5 point. The candidate who receives the most points is declared The winner.

22
New cards

1

PAIRWISE COMPARISON METHOD: The candidate with the most votes receives __ point

23
New cards

0.5

PAIRWISE COMPARISON METHOD: If there is a tie, each candidate receives __ point.

24
New cards

Weighted Voting System

This arises among shareholders, where each voters controls a number of votes

25
New cards

Players

The voters are called the _______, denoted by P

26
New cards

Weight

The number of votes held by a voted is called a ______ and is a positive number, denoted by w

27
New cards

Quota

This is the minimum number of votes in order to pass a motion, denoted by q. This must be over half the total weigthts and cannot be more that total weight

28
New cards

One Person, One Vote

Example: (5: 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1)

Each person has one vote and five votes, a majority, are required to pass a measure.

29
New cards

Dictartorship

Example: (20, 21, 6, 5, 4, 3)

The person with 21 votes can pass a measure. Even if the remaining four people get together, their votes do not total the quota of 20.

30
New cards

Null System

Example: (28: 6, 3, 5 2)

If all the members of this system vote for a measure, the total number of votes is 16, which is less than the quota. Therefore, no measure can be passed.

31
New cards

Veto Power System

Example: (21: 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1)

The sum of all the votes is 21, the quota. Therefore, if any of one voter does not vote for the measure, it will fail. Each voter is said to have a veto power.

32
New cards

Dictator

A player will be a ______ if their weight is greater than or equal to the quota.

33
New cards

Dictator

This can also block any proposal from passing; the other players cannot reach the quota without the dictator.

34
New cards

Veto Power

A player has __________ if their support is necessary for the quota to be reached.

35
New cards

Veto Power

It is possible for more than one player to have veto power, or for no player to have veto power.

36
New cards

Dummy

A player is a _____ if their vote is never essential for a group to reach quota.

37
New cards

Coalition

This is any group of players voting the same way.

38
New cards

Weight

A coalition is a winning coalition if the coalition has enough _____ to meet the quota.

39
New cards

Critical Player

A player is ________ in a coalition if them leaving the coalition would change it from a winning coalition to a losing coalition.

40
New cards

61

Based on the 1987 Constitution Filipino voters will pick groups that would comprise 20% of the House of Representatives, or ___ seats, with the remaining 80% elected per legislative district.

41
New cards

2

There will be __ rounds of seat allocation for the party-list group.

42
New cards

Party-List

The COMELEC will rank them according to the total number of votes.

43
New cards

2%

A party-list group that secures at least ___ of the total votes in the party-list race is entitled to at least 1 slot in the House during the first round of seat allocation.

44
New cards

Apportionment

A method of dividing a group of people (or other resources) and assigning them to different places.

45
New cards

Seats

The "_____" are the people or items that are to be shared equally.

46
New cards

States

The "____" are the parties that will receive a proportional share of the "seats".

47
New cards

Standard Divisor

This is the ratio of the total population to the number of seats.

48
New cards

Standard Divisor

It tell us how many people are represented by each seat

49
New cards

SD = total population/number of seats

FORMULA FOR STANDARD DIVISOR

50
New cards

Standard Quota

This is the exact number of seats that should be allocated to each state if decimal values were possible.

51
New cards

SQ = state population/standard divisor

FORMULA FOR STANDARD QUOTA

52
New cards

Lower Quota

It is the standard quota rounded down.

53
New cards

Higher Quota

It is the standard quota rounded up

54
New cards

Hamilton’s Method

Alexander Hamilton proposed this method. He determines how many representatives each state should get by following some steps.

55
New cards

Alexander Hamilton

Who proposed Hamilton’s method?

56
New cards

Hamilton’s Method

This method was approved by Congress in 1791 but was vetoed by President Washington.

57
New cards

Hamilton’s Method

It was later adopted in 1852 and used through 1911.

58
New cards

Jefferson’s Method

Thomas Jefferson proposed a different method of apportionment.

59
New cards

Thomas Jefferson

He proposed a different method of apportionment.

60
New cards

Jefferson’s Method

After Washington vetoed Hamilton's method, this method was adopted and used in Congress from 1791 through 1842.

61
New cards

Jefferson’s Method

This method favors larger states.

62
New cards

Thomas Jefferson

He had political reasons for wanting this method to be used rather than Hamilton's.

63
New cards

Thomas Jefferson

He would also argue that it's the ratio of people to representatives that is the critical thing, and apportionment methods should be based on that.