Wallerstein - World Systems Theory
In the 16th century → the emergence of the European world economy based upon the capitalist mode of production
Ideology at the time = raison d’état
Capitalist world economy: economic decisions are oriented primarily to the arena of the world economy, while political decisions are oriented primarily to the smaller structures that have legal control, the states within the world economy
*Distinction of the economic and political!
The states do not develop and cannot be understood except within the context of the development of the world system
The modern class system began to take its shape in the 16th century
1450-1640: meaningful time unit during which was created a capitalist world economy
European world economy: northwest Europe, Christian Mediterranean, Central Europe, Baltic region, regions in America, Atlantic islands, African coast
There was an expansion through formal overseas colonies of European powers
Demographic scissors movement: demographic growth in Europe which is nullified at the planetary level by the decline in immense extra-European sectors
Land/labor ratio of the European world economy was immensely increased
This sustained continued economic growth
It made possible the large-scale accumulation of basic capital used to finance the rationalization of agricultural production
It is the overall system with its structured pressures for certain kinds of political decisions which is crucial to explain the expansion
The ability to expand successfully depended on the ability to maintain relative social solidarity at home and the arrangements that can be made to use cheap labour far away
Expansion involves unequal development and, therefore differential rewards
Differentials:
Core vs. peripheral areas
Between states
Within states, between regions
Within regions, between cities
Within local units
Fantastic spread of prices and eventually the closing of the gap
Price rise in the 16th century
In countries where industry expanded → it was necessary to turn over a larger proportion of the land to the needs of horses
But the men were still there only now they were fed increasingly by Baltic grain, which was more expensive
Increased supply of bullion
Sustained the thrust of the expansion
Prevented the fall of prices
Cheapened money, leading to the decline of the interest rate
Wage lag:
In England and France → prices rose, wages and rents failed
Not in Spain! This created a gap, which was the major source of capital accumulation in the 16th century
Dramatic drop in wages was caused by:
Money illusions + discontinuity of wage demands
Wage fixing by custom, contract, or statute
Delay in payment
Inflation
Created a redistribution of incomes
Method of taxing the politically weakest sectors to provide a capital accumulation fund
It encouraged investment
Inflation was important because it was a mechanism of forced savings + capital accumulation and because it served to distribute these profits unevenly through the system, disproportionately into the core and away from its periphery and semiperiphery
Rural exodus: provided the unskilled labour for the new industries
In the areas of greater agricultural specialization, there was a thrust to industrialize
Led to the specialization of labour
The expansion of agricultural productivity opened the way to the expansion of real income
Each mode of labour control is best suited for particular types of production
Slavery + feudalism (forced labour) → periphery
Wage labour + self-employment (free labour) → core
Sharecropping → semiperiphery
Modes of labour greatly affect the political system
World economy was based on the assumption that there were 3 zones and that they did have different modes of labour control
In the peripheral areas, there were 2 primary activities: mines (for bullion) and agriculture (for food) → monoculture
In the core areas: population density was higher → agriculture was more intensive + varied → more skilled labour → increased division of labour
It was an economic expansion, a period of demographic growth, and increased productivity
It marked the establishment of regular trade between Europe and the rest of the inhabited world
System of multiple layers of social status and social reward + complex system of distribution of productive tasks
Types of workers:
Slaves
Serfs
Tenant farmers
Yeoman farmers
Intermediate personnel
Ruling classes: nobility + bourgeoisie
The existence of a strong indigenous bourgeoisie had a particular impact on the development of agricultural production in times of distress
New yeoman class became a significant economic and political force
They had every incentive to be entrepreneurial since they were seeking wealth and upward mobility
New class of industrialists: committed to a modern economy, driven by profit
There were extra-economic coercive forces that were pressuring the landowners to go further than they intended + there was competition for labour
The English legal system allowed more flexibility for landlords, so money tenancy and wage labour continued to expand
Northwest Europe = divided the use of land for pastoral and arable products because:
The widening market created a larger market for pastoral products
The periphery of the world economy provided cereal supplements for the core areas
The semiperiphery was turning away from industry and toward relative self-sufficiency in agriculture
The key was the emergence of capitalism as the dominant mode of social organization of the economy
There was not on capitalism but several European capitalisms each with its zone and its circuits
The technology of business transactions had seen some important advances which enabled commercial capitalism to increase
The 16th century is characterized by the diffusion of techniques from the core to the periphery of European civilization
Europe expanded into the Americas
Price revolution + wage-lag
Rural labour: rise of coerced cash-crop labour in the periphery + yeoman farmer in the core
In the 16th century → the emergence of the European world economy based upon the capitalist mode of production
Ideology at the time = raison d’état
Capitalist world economy: economic decisions are oriented primarily to the arena of the world economy, while political decisions are oriented primarily to the smaller structures that have legal control, the states within the world economy
*Distinction of the economic and political!
The states do not develop and cannot be understood except within the context of the development of the world system
The modern class system began to take its shape in the 16th century
1450-1640: meaningful time unit during which was created a capitalist world economy
European world economy: northwest Europe, Christian Mediterranean, Central Europe, Baltic region, regions in America, Atlantic islands, African coast
There was an expansion through formal overseas colonies of European powers
Demographic scissors movement: demographic growth in Europe which is nullified at the planetary level by the decline in immense extra-European sectors
Land/labor ratio of the European world economy was immensely increased
This sustained continued economic growth
It made possible the large-scale accumulation of basic capital used to finance the rationalization of agricultural production
It is the overall system with its structured pressures for certain kinds of political decisions which is crucial to explain the expansion
The ability to expand successfully depended on the ability to maintain relative social solidarity at home and the arrangements that can be made to use cheap labour far away
Expansion involves unequal development and, therefore differential rewards
Differentials:
Core vs. peripheral areas
Between states
Within states, between regions
Within regions, between cities
Within local units
Fantastic spread of prices and eventually the closing of the gap
Price rise in the 16th century
In countries where industry expanded → it was necessary to turn over a larger proportion of the land to the needs of horses
But the men were still there only now they were fed increasingly by Baltic grain, which was more expensive
Increased supply of bullion
Sustained the thrust of the expansion
Prevented the fall of prices
Cheapened money, leading to the decline of the interest rate
Wage lag:
In England and France → prices rose, wages and rents failed
Not in Spain! This created a gap, which was the major source of capital accumulation in the 16th century
Dramatic drop in wages was caused by:
Money illusions + discontinuity of wage demands
Wage fixing by custom, contract, or statute
Delay in payment
Inflation
Created a redistribution of incomes
Method of taxing the politically weakest sectors to provide a capital accumulation fund
It encouraged investment
Inflation was important because it was a mechanism of forced savings + capital accumulation and because it served to distribute these profits unevenly through the system, disproportionately into the core and away from its periphery and semiperiphery
Rural exodus: provided the unskilled labour for the new industries
In the areas of greater agricultural specialization, there was a thrust to industrialize
Led to the specialization of labour
The expansion of agricultural productivity opened the way to the expansion of real income
Each mode of labour control is best suited for particular types of production
Slavery + feudalism (forced labour) → periphery
Wage labour + self-employment (free labour) → core
Sharecropping → semiperiphery
Modes of labour greatly affect the political system
World economy was based on the assumption that there were 3 zones and that they did have different modes of labour control
In the peripheral areas, there were 2 primary activities: mines (for bullion) and agriculture (for food) → monoculture
In the core areas: population density was higher → agriculture was more intensive + varied → more skilled labour → increased division of labour
It was an economic expansion, a period of demographic growth, and increased productivity
It marked the establishment of regular trade between Europe and the rest of the inhabited world
System of multiple layers of social status and social reward + complex system of distribution of productive tasks
Types of workers:
Slaves
Serfs
Tenant farmers
Yeoman farmers
Intermediate personnel
Ruling classes: nobility + bourgeoisie
The existence of a strong indigenous bourgeoisie had a particular impact on the development of agricultural production in times of distress
New yeoman class became a significant economic and political force
They had every incentive to be entrepreneurial since they were seeking wealth and upward mobility
New class of industrialists: committed to a modern economy, driven by profit
There were extra-economic coercive forces that were pressuring the landowners to go further than they intended + there was competition for labour
The English legal system allowed more flexibility for landlords, so money tenancy and wage labour continued to expand
Northwest Europe = divided the use of land for pastoral and arable products because:
The widening market created a larger market for pastoral products
The periphery of the world economy provided cereal supplements for the core areas
The semiperiphery was turning away from industry and toward relative self-sufficiency in agriculture
The key was the emergence of capitalism as the dominant mode of social organization of the economy
There was not on capitalism but several European capitalisms each with its zone and its circuits
The technology of business transactions had seen some important advances which enabled commercial capitalism to increase
The 16th century is characterized by the diffusion of techniques from the core to the periphery of European civilization
Europe expanded into the Americas
Price revolution + wage-lag
Rural labour: rise of coerced cash-crop labour in the periphery + yeoman farmer in the core