Medical Law Mid-semester Master Document

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/39

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

40 Terms

1
New cards

Contract

A legally binding agreement between parties, often defined and enforced in legal contexts through cases like Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co..

2
New cards

Battery

The intentional and direct application of force to another person without their consent, as seen in cases like Cole v. Turner.

3
New cards

Negligence

A failure to take reasonable care to avoid causing injury or losses to another person, exemplified in the foundational case Donoghue v. Stevenson.

4
New cards

Implied Terms

Terms that are not expressly stated but are considered to be included in a contract by law or circumstance, such as those recognized in cases like Liverpool City Council v. Irwin.

5
New cards

Express Terms

Specific terms that are clearly stated in a contract, highlighted in contractual disputes reflected in cases like Parol Evidence Rule.

6
New cards

Duty of Care

A legal obligation to ensure the safety or well-being of others, illustrated in the landmark case Caparo Industries plc v. Dickman.

7
New cards

Breach of Contract

A violation of any of the agreed-upon terms and conditions of a binding contract, such as established in Rocky Mountain IMC v. A&M*.

8
New cards

Liability

The state of being legally responsible for something, especially by law, as clarified in various tort law cases.

9
New cards

Consent

Permission for something to happen or agreement to do something, which can be seen in medical consent cases like Montgomery v. Lanarkshire Health Board.

10
New cards

Causation

The relationship between cause and effect, which must be established in tort cases like Barnett v. Chelsea & Kensington Hospital Management Committee.

11
New cards

Self-defense

The act of defending oneself from an imminent attack, relying on principles established in cases like R v. Smith.

12
New cards

Contributory Negligence

A legal concept where a plaintiff's own negligence contributed to their injury and may limit recovery, highlighted in Butterfield v. Forrester.

13
New cards

Medical Malpractice

A type of negligence where a healthcare professional fails to provide competent care, as seen in the case of Hoffman v. Board of Education.

14
New cards

Reasonable Care

The level of care that a reasonable person would exercise in similar circumstances, as illustrated in cases like Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee.

15
New cards

Remedies

Legal means of enforcing a right or redressing a wrong, discussed in the context of cases like Hadley v. Baxendale.

16
New cards

Statutory Authority

A public authority or agency created by statute to carry out specific laws, illustrated by R v. SoS for the Home Department.

17
New cards

Voluntary Assumption of Risk

A doctrine that a person can accept the risks associated with an activity, as seen in Murphy v. Steeplechase Amusement Co..

18
New cards

Informed Consent

A process for obtaining permission before conducting a healthcare intervention, highlighted in Sullivan v. Smith.

19
New cards

Defences

Legal reasons that can justify an action or excuse someone from liability, as outlined in various negligence defenses.

20
New cards

Underlying Condition

Pre-existing health issues that may affect medical treatment outcomes, relevant in malpractice cases like McLain v. McNamara.

21
New cards

Foreign Objects

Items inadvertently left in a patient’s body after surgery, which can lead to negligence claims, as discussed in cases like Stinson v. Kirk.

22
New cards

Material Risk

A risk that a reasonable patient would consider significant when deciding on treatment, illustrated in Pearson v. Lightning.

23
New cards

Vicarious Liability

A principle holding employers responsible for the negligent actions of their employees during work, as established in Respondeat Superior.

24
New cards

Tort

A civil wrong that causes harm or loss to individuals, which can lead to legal liability, exemplified in Donoghue v. Stevenson.

25
New cards

Standard of Care

The level of care that one must exercise to prevent harm to others, reflected in cases like Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee.

26
New cards

Assumption of Risk

A defense that bars recovery for injuries if the plaintiff voluntarily accepted the known risks, seen in Murphy v. Steeplechase Amusement Co..

27
New cards

Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress

A tort claim arising when negligent actions lead to severe emotional distress, as outlined in Dillon v. Legg.

28
New cards

Duty to Rescue

An obligation to assist those in peril, which varies by jurisdiction, illustrated in case law like Vanderbilt v. New York City.

29
New cards

Informed Consent Process

The process through which a patient understands and consents to a medical treatment or procedure proposed by a healthcare provider.

30
New cards

Breach of Duty

The failure to meet the standard of care that a reasonable person would exercise in a similar situation, highlighted in cases like Palsgraf v. Long Island Railway Co..

31
New cards

Causation in Tort Law

The necessity to establish that the defendant's breach of duty directly caused the plaintiff's injury, emphasized in Kimberly v. Hurd.

32
New cards

Statute of Limitations

The maximum time allowed after an event within which legal proceedings may be initiated, as determined in various civil cases.

33
New cards

Punitive Damages

Damages awarded in excess of compensation to punish the defendant for egregious wrongdoing, evident in BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore.

34
New cards

Assumption of Duty

A situation where a person voluntarily undertakes a duty of care, potentially leading to liability, as seen in Doe v. Taylor Independent School District.

35
New cards

Negligent Misrepresentation

A false statement made carelessly that leads another to rely on it, causing them harm, highlighted in Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v. Heller & Partners Ltd.

36
New cards

Duty of Loyalty

An obligation for an individual to act in the best interest of another party, typically seen in fiduciary relationships and clarified in Meinhard v. Salmon.

37
New cards

Scope of Employment

The range of activities that an employee is reasonably expected to undertake as part of their job, defined in Respondeat Superior cases.

38
New cards

Legal Capacity

The ability to enter into a contract or take legal actions, generally determined by age and mental competence, illustrated in Minor v. Swope.

39
New cards

Baker v. Lawrie

In this case, damages for battery included compensation for emotional stress caused by the defendant’s actions.

40
New cards

State v. Cummings

A case that exemplified statutory battery, illustrating the legal definition and its enforcement.