1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Lenins economy - state capitalism
(1917–1918)
Definition: Transitional phase combining elements of capitalism with state control.
Key Features:
Major industries were nationalised (e.g. banks, railways).
The Supreme Council of the National Economy (Vesenkha) was established to manage the economy.
Small businesses remained in private hands.
Aimed to avoid total collapse and allow the Bolsheviks to consolidate power.
Problems:
Workers’ control often led to chaos, inefficiency, and falling output.
Peasants refused to supply grain to cities (no incentives).
Unpopular among radical Bolsheviks who wanted full socialism.
lenin’s economy - war communism
(1918–1921)
Why Introduced:
Civil War demanded strict control to ensure Red victory.
Economy was collapsing (hyperinflation, famine, dislocation).
Key Features:
Grain requisitioning: Peasants forced to give grain to the state, often violently.
Nationalisation of all industry (even small-scale).
Ban on private trade.
Labour discipline and rationing introduced.
Money effectively abolished in some areas (barter economy).
Consequences:
Urban industrial output collapsed.
Famine (especially 1921): over 5 million deaths.
Peasants resisted—Tambov Uprising (1920–21).
Kronstadt Rebellion (1921) showed growing discontent, even among loyal Bolsheviks.
lenins economy nep
(1921–1924)
Why Introduced:
Crisis caused by War Communism.
To win back peasant and worker support (political survival).
Approved at 10th Party Congress (1921).
Key Features:
Grain requisitioning ended – replaced by a tax in kind.
Peasants could sell surplus on the open market.
Small businesses and private trade legalised.
Large industries remained under state control (commanding heights).
NEPmen emerged: private traders profiting in new mixed economy.
Consequences:
Agricultural and industrial production recovered.
Peasants happier and more productive.
Led to divisions within the Party:
Left (e.g. Trotsky): saw NEP as betrayal of socialism.
Right (e.g. Bukharin): supported NEP as necessary.
Long-Term Issues:
Economy improved, but unevenly.
Industrial growth slower than agriculture = Scissors Crisis (1923).
Created ideological tension about the future of socialism.
stalins economy first five year plan
(1928–1932)
Aims:
Rapid industrialisation
Focus on heavy industry (coal, iron, steel, machinery)
Methods:
Gosplan (State Planning Committee) set production targets
Emphasis on quantity over quality
Use of shock workers (e.g. Stakhanovites)
Central control, no free market
Achievements:
Huge increases in coal, steel, electricity output
New industrial cities (e.g. Magnitogorsk)
USSR became more self-sufficient
Problems:
Poor quality goods
Consumer goods neglected
Widespread corruption and falsification of results
stalins economy second five year plan
(1933–1937)
Shift in focus:
Continued heavy industry, but increased attention to transport and communications
Some consumer goods reintroduced (briefly)
Achievements:
Moscow Metro and Dnieper Dam completed
USSR became world’s second-largest industrial power
Military production began to rise
stalins economy third five year plan
(1938–1941)
Main aim
Armament and defence industry due to rising threat from Nazi Germany
Interrupted by: German invasion in 1941 (Operation Barbarossa)
stalins economy during world war 2
Impact of war:
Factories moved east (beyond Ural Mountains)
Massive human and material losses
Focus entirely on military production
Achievements:
USSR outproduced Germany in tanks and aircraft
War effort supported by centralised planning
stalins economy fourth five year plan
(1945–1950)
Goals:
Rebuild destroyed infrastructure
Continue heavy industry
Results:
Quick recovery in industry
USSR restored pre-war industrial levels by 1950
Issues:
Consumer goods neglected
Agriculture remained weak
stalins economy collectivisation of agriculture
Why?
Fund industrialisation through grain exports
End private peasant farming (NEP seen as "capitalist")
Ensure government control over countryside
Launched: 1929
Key Features:
Merging of small farms into large, state-controlled kolkhozy (collective farms) and sovkhozy (state farms)
Use of terror and requisitioning
Dekulakisation: wealthier peasants (kulaks) were executed, exiled, or imprisoned
Resistance crushed by the OGPU and Red Army
Results:
Grain procurement increased (eventually)
Massive peasant resistance and slaughter of livestock
Famine (1932–33): especially in Ukraine (Holodomor) – millions died
Long-term inefficiency in agriculture
Peasants remained poor and unmotivated
khrushchevs economy - economic reforms
Key Aims:
Move away from Stalin’s focus on heavy industry
Improve consumer goods availability
Increase efficiency through decentralisation
Main Policies:
🔹 Decentralisation – 1957
Created 105 regional economic councils (sovnarkhozy) to manage industry
Intended to make planning more responsive and flexible
Result: led to confusion, duplication, and weakened central control
🔹 Seven-Year Plan (1959–1965)
Focused on chemicals, consumer goods, and light industry
Promised 40% rise in consumer goods production
🔹 Investment in space and military tech
1957: USSR launched Sputnik (first artificial satellite)
Investment in prestige projects but not sustainable for wider economy
Results:
Some growth in consumer industries, e.g. TVs, refrigerators, radios
Military spending and space race drained resources
Poor coordination due to reforms and regional fragmentation
khrushchevs economy - agriculture
Key Policies:
🔹 Virgin Lands Campaign (1954)
Cultivate unused land in Kazakhstan and Siberia
6 million acres brought under cultivation
Initial success: Grain output rose rapidly early on
Long-term failure: Poor soil, inadequate planning, declining yields by late 1950s
🔹 Increased state investment in agriculture
Higher prices paid to peasants for produce
Fertiliser and machinery production boosted
Collective farms merged into larger units
🔹 Maize Campaign (1959)
Khrushchev encouraged widespread maize planting to feed livestock
Failed due to unsuitable climate and poor planning
Outcomes:
Short-lived improvement in production
By 1963, grain had to be imported from the USA – humiliating for USSR
Agricultural problems exposed limits of Khrushchev’s reforms
brezhnevs economy - industry and economic policy
Key Themes:
Re-centralisation: Khrushchev’s decentralisation (sovnarkhozy) was reversed.
Focus returned to heavy industry, defence, and energy.
Reluctance to reform: stability > innovation.
📉 Economic Stagnation:
Growth in the 1950s: ~7%
By 1980s: ~2% or less
📦 Kosygin Reforms (1965)
Led by Premier Alexei Kosygin – aimed to improve productivity and reward efficiency.
Reforms included:
Giving factory managers more power
Emphasising output quality, not just quantity
Offering incentives for innovation
Why they failed:
Opposed by Party conservatives
Poor implementation
Reforms quickly abandoned by 1968
❌ Persistent Problems:
Central planning was inflexible
Managers falsified production figures to meet targets
Focus on quantity > quality
Obsolete machinery and factories
brezhnevs economy agriulture
Key Features:
Continued use of collective and state farms
Some incentives for productivity (e.g., private garden plots allowed)
Outcomes:
25% of investment went to agriculture
But: Grain production still couldn’t meet demand
USSR had to import grain (e.g., from the USA in the 1970s)
Causes of failure:
Poor motivation of collective farm workers
Low efficiency
Lack of reform in farm structure
brezhnevs spending on military arms race
Huge spending on military and defence (20%+ of GDP by late 1970s)
Driven by Cold War and desire for global superpower status
Took resources away from consumer goods and innovation
brezhnevs consumer goods
light improvement in living standards (more TVs, fridges, cars)
But availability was poor, and quality was low
Queues, shortages, and black market common
Rural standards of living lagged behind urban areas
brezhnevs second economy / black market
Because the planned economy couldn’t meet demand, a “second economy” emerged:
Illegal trading
Moonlighting
Corruption
Result: Some got rich unofficially; exposed weaknesses in the official system.