1/17
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
development of the approach
Albert Bandura proposed SLT as a development of behaviourism, agreed that learning occurs through experience but argued that classical and operant conditioning couldn’t account for human learning
he believed there are important mental processes that lie between the stimulus and response proposed by behaviours, bridge between behaviourism and cognitive
similarities and differences of SLT and behaviourism
similarities: behaviour is learnt through experience, role of reinforcement
differences: SLT looks forward while behaviourism looks back, distinction between learning and performance in SLT, animals aren’t seen the same as humans in SLT
similarities and differences of SLT and cognitive
similarities: role of cognitive processes, focus on human behaviour rather than animals
differences: observational learning not in cognitive, cognitive focuses more on cognitive processes eg schema, SLT focus on external behaviour while cognitive focuses on internal processes
assumptions of the approach
combines principles from both cognitive and behaviours approaches
concerned with human rather than animal behaviour
sees people as active manipulators of their own environment not passive receivers of experiences
learning occurs through observation and imitation of role models
observational learning cant take place without reinforcement either direct to indirect
vicarious reinforcement
learning through observation of role models receiving either positive or negative reinforcement
children (and adults) observe other peoples behaviour and take note of its consequences, behaviour that is seen to be rewarded (reinforced) is more likely to be copied
mediational processes
the cognitive processes such as memory that are used in observational learning that take place between stimulus and response
2 types of models
live model: people who are present in our environment eg teachers, parents, siblings etc
symbolic models: people who are present in the media eg celebrities
4 meditational processes
for modelling to occur there must be
attention- noticing the behaviour
retention- remembering the behaviour
motor reproduction- it has to be physically possible
motivation- has to be some reason to want to copy the role model
first 2 relate to learning, second 2 relate to performance, unlike behaviourism learning and performance don’t have to occur together
identification
when an individual adopts an attitude or behaviour in line with their role model
people are more likely to imitate the behaviour of those with whom they identify, such role models are similar to the observer, attractive and have high status
Bandura’s 1960s Bobo Doll experiment- procedure
Bandura was studying the effects of observation of a model on subsequenct behaviour
1961- he recorded the behaviour of your children who had either watched an adult behave in an aggressive way towards a bobo doll eg hit it with a hammer and shouted abuse at it, or a non aggressive way, the children then played in a room with the bobo doll and other toys
1963- children either saw an adult who was rewarded, punished or had no consequence
Bandura’s 1960s Bobo Doll experiment- findings
1961- when given their own doll to play with, the children who had seen aggression were much more aggressive to the doll, they imitated same sex adults more
1983- when given their own doll, the children who saw the aggression rewarded were much more aggressive themselves
suggests children are likely to model acts of violence if they observe them in an adult role model, modelling is more likely if behaviour is rewarded (vicarious reinforcement)
suggests mediating cognitive factors (thinking) must be intervening between observation and behaviour i.e something between stimulus and response
development of behaviour- ongoing cycle
behaviour is observed- behaviour is displayed by role model considered to be worth imitating, identification
behaviour is imitated- there needs to be self efficacy, the belief behaviour can be imitated
behaviour is reinforced- if the behaviour is punished it won’t be reinforced
behaviour is repeated- provided the outcomes are positive
behaviour is internalised- becomes part of the persons repertoire of behaviours
applications of SLT
anxiety disorders- modelling to treat disorders eg showing a model interacting happily with a phobic object, vicarious association is made between positive feelings demonstrated and the object
forensic psychology- social skills training may use modelling to provide offenders will skills to avoid offending behaviour
gender development- SLT see gender related behaviour as acquired by reinforcement, modelling and imitation
aggression- results from observational learning, an influential model being rewarded for being aggressive may be imitated by others
strength- emphasises the importance of cognitive factors
neither classical or operant conditioning can offer a comprehensive account of human learning on their own as cognitive factors are omitted
humans and animals store information about others behaviour and use this to make judgements on when its appropriate to do certain actions
shows that SLT provides a more complete explanation of human learning than behaviourism by recognising the role of meditational processes
counterpoint of emphasises the importance of cognitive factors
recent research suggests observational learning is controlled by mirror neurons in the brain, which allow us to empathise with and imitate others
suggests SLT may make too little reference to the influence of biological factors on social learning
limitation- relies too heavily on evidence from contrived lab studies
many of Bandura’s ideas were developed through observation of children’s behaviour in lab settings and this raises the problem of demand characteristics
the main purpose of the Bobo doll is to hit it, so the children in those studies may have been behaving as they thought was expected
thus the research may tell us little about how children actually learn aggression in everyday life
strength- real world application
social learning principles can account for how children learn from others around them and the media, this can explain how cultural norms are transmitted
this proved useful in understanding a range of behaviours eg how children come to understand their gender role by imitating role models in the media
increases the value of SLT as it can account for real world behaviours
strength- reciprocal determinism
Bandura emphasised reciprocal determinism, were influenced by our environment, but we also exert an influence on it through our behaviours
this element of choice suggests there’s some free will in the way we behave
this is a more realistic and flexible position than suggested by behaviourism as it recognises the role we play in shaping our own environment